For a few months now, you've been able to filter scan results by stocks with options (which are optionable). Earlier this week, by request, I also added the ability to filter by stocks which have weekly options. Here is where you can find those filters:Read More ➞
I just released a new feature which will be a huge time saver when looking through scan results. There's a new option which allow you to see up to 20 charts at a time. It looks like this:Read More ➞
Scanning for a given pattern / signal over a range of dates is a feature I've wanted for a long time. A nice side-effect of the recent change I made to the way things are stored in the site's database is that it's now much easier for me to build that capability. Over the last couple of weeks I received a few requests for adding a date range to the scans. So starting today paid subscribers will be able to run scans across a date range. You'll see that there's now an end date as part of the search / filter criteria.Read More ➞
I had a really good email exchange with somebody (Jason) the other day. He shared with me how he incorporates SwingTradeBot's data into his research process. Here's part of our exchange:Read More ➞
I've been thinking a lot about stocks which have undergone parabolic rises based on (what I consider) a lot of hype and little substance. That's been fueled by where the bulk of my trading profits have come from over the last few months -- shorting those type of parabolic moves. (Some call those stocks "flying pigs".)
For example, I've shorted VERI 3 times after the crash through 60:
OSTK 4 times (breaking even on the first 3 attempts but a nice winner on the 4th)
XNET was the biggest short-term winner I've had this year...
— Michael Seneadza (@TraderMike) November 29, 2017
So after that XNET success I really started thinking "I need a way to find these kind of movers quickly." So I'm thinking about adding a "Gone Parabolic" scan. I have some ideas on how to do it. Some criteria:
- Must be above the Upper Bollinger Band
- Must be trending up very strongly (can use ADX and Directional Movement for that determination)
- Must be up over 70% in the last few months
- Must have Overbought Stochastic (almost a certainty if the above are all present)
I'll be playing around with that over the weekend to see what I can come up with. But in the mean time, a pretty good approximation is to use the Percentage Gainers scan, looking at the last 90 days and checking the charts of those stocks which are up more than 70% over that period.
Of course with any of these scans, you'd want to investigate why the stock has been rallying and then decide a course of action.
*** Note that shorting these kind of moves is not for the faint of heart! You can get slaughtered if you jump in too early. So if you want to wade into these waters, be sure to have a well thought out plan and control your risk (scaling in may help).Read More ➞
The other day somebody asked me if there was a way to run a scan and only see results from his watchlists. There was not, but after discussing it for a while I saw how it could be useful to those who like to trade from a specific set of stocks.
So I've now added the ability to run scans against just the stocks which are in your watchlists and portfolios. Just check the box next to "Only My Stocks" in the form where you enter your scan criteria.Read More ➞
I have some good news for the many people who have asked me for a market cap scan filter. As of today you can finally filter by that piece of fundamental data, You'll see a couple of new parameters in the form where you enter your scan criteria. Those news parameters allow you to choose values for a minimum and a maximum market cap.Read More ➞
I recently added some data which may be helpful in getting a feel for what scans are "trending". I've started tracking the number of stocks which appear on each scan each day. That's enabled the ability to show how much above or below normal a scan is on any given day. You can find this data in two places.Read More ➞
Over the last few weeks a few people have asked me if there is a way to differentiate new 52-week intraday highs from closing highs. The "new highs & lows" scans I've had on the site for years were simply alerting to intraday extremes. So I've decided to create a couple of new scans:
The original scans are still here but I've made these new signals/scans replace the old ones with regard to how the system treats them. For example, I used to count a stock making a new 52-week intraday high as a bullish signal. That always bothered me a bit because that same stock could have opened at a new high and sold off horrendously during the day. In a situation like that, the site would still be showing that new high as bullish. Well that won't happen anymore. I've changed the new intraday highs & lows to be neutral signals and the new ones will count as bullish or bearish. Hopefully you'll find these new ones useful.Read More ➞
I'm sharing an email exchange I had earlier today in hopes that it will help others to find ways to get exactly what they want when using the site to scan for stocks. A friend sent me this:
I was looking through your hammer scans on SwingTradeBot to see how Zillow stacked up on the grading curve. I was surprised Zillow (Z) only got a B. I looked at the A rated puppies and felt like Zillow (Z) should be higher rated. Then I realized what I really want is a modified hammer scan. I want hammers that come at the end of a period of selling, even better if it is an oversold hammer or a hammer coming off a high. The preceding selling has to be at least three straight down days. Did you already read my mind and create such a thing, or do I need to put a suggestion in the idea box? :)
Here's my answer:Read More ➞