MBCC vs. RZV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) to Guggenheim S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV)

MBCC

Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF

MBCC Description

The investment seeks to replicate investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index. The index consists of established, well-recognized companies listed on the S&P 500 from a broad range of industries that demonstrate strength in the marketplace based on fundamental company data such as revenue, revenue growth, net income, and net income growth.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.26

Average Daily Volume

13,797

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RZV

Guggenheim S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF

RZV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P SmallCap 600 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$102.03

Average Daily Volume

9,055

Number of Holdings ^*

133

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MBCC	RZV
30 Days	-4.33%	-2.36%
60 Days	-4.25%	-2.65%
90 Days	0.24%	-0.63%
12 Months	22.23%	19.87%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in MBCC	Weight in RZV	Overlap

MBCC Overweight 24 Positions Relative to RZV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GE	A	5.48%
NVDA	C	4.69%
PEP	A	4.51%
ALL	B	4.5%
ORCL	D	4.41%
EMR	D	4.35%
MRK	B	4.33%
AMZN	B	4.33%
TMO	C	4.28%
DIS	C	4.25%
LLY	C	4.14%
COST	B	4.13%
MSFT	D	4.11%
V	D	4.07%
MA	D	4.07%
AAPL	C	4.06%
MCD	D	3.96%
SBUX	F	3.94%
NFLX	C	3.93%
NKE	F	3.83%
CRM	D	3.78%
AMT	D	3.72%
ADBE	D	3.57%
INTC	F	3.08%

MBCC Underweight 133 Positions Relative to RZV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PHIN	A	-1.91%
JBLU	D	-1.8%
FDP	A	-1.72%
KELYA	C	-1.71%
SATS	B	-1.55%
GDOT	C	-1.5%
EZPW	B	-1.45%
SCSC	B	-1.4%
AAP	D	-1.38%
XRX	F	-1.37%
NVRI	F	-1.34%
GBX	B	-1.33%
BHE	A	-1.33%
KSS	C	-1.33%
MODG	B	-1.33%
GNW	B	-1.3%
CLW	A	-1.27%
JXN	A	-1.26%
DXPE	A	-1.2%
KALU	A	-1.13%
NATL	B	-1.12%
FL	F	-1.1%
SNEX	A	-1.08%
HZO	F	-1.08%
AHCO	B	-1.03%
BGS	B	-1.03%
MERC	A	-1.03%
SANM	B	-1.02%
DBI	D	-1.02%
CWK	B	-1.02%
GEO	A	-1.0%
MD	D	-0.98%
ODP	D	-0.98%
UNFI	F	-0.94%
REZI	C	-0.93%
SPTN	D	-0.92%
AMCX	F	-0.9%
MATV	A	-0.89%
MPW	B	-0.87%
CENX	B	-0.86%
AXL	C	-0.86%
SBH	C	-0.85%
OMI	D	-0.85%
OI	F	-0.85%
DAN	B	-0.83%
CAL	D	-0.82%
SAH	A	-0.82%
CHEF	B	-0.78%
SLCA	A	-0.77%
UFCS	A	-0.77%
PRAA	C	-0.75%
PRA	B	-0.75%
SXC	D	-0.75%
PEB	F	-0.71%
DNOW	D	-0.7%
ABM	A	-0.69%
HIBB	A	-0.67%
ALK	B	-0.67%
STC	A	-0.67%
DLX	A	-0.66%
ASIX	F	-0.65%
GIII	C	-0.63%
NWL	D	-0.61%
SCVL	B	-0.6%
RUN	F	-0.6%
CCRN	F	-0.6%
HPP	F	-0.57%
BDN	A	-0.57%
ALGT	F	-0.55%
ASTE	F	-0.54%
PAHC	A	-0.53%
NBR	F	-0.53%
UVV	B	-0.53%
HOPE	D	-0.53%
TILE	B	-0.52%
AOSL	D	-0.52%
SFNC	D	-0.5%
JBGS	F	-0.5%
PUMP	B	-0.49%
MCY	A	-0.48%
VTOL	C	-0.48%
HSII	D	-0.46%
WWW	B	-0.46%
VSAT	F	-0.46%
CLDT	F	-0.46%
DXC	F	-0.45%
WNC	F	-0.45%
LNC	D	-0.45%
SLG	A	-0.45%
NAVI	F	-0.43%
VSTO	A	-0.43%
BANC	C	-0.43%
EGBN	F	-0.41%
NUS	F	-0.41%
TTMI	A	-0.4%
MLKN	C	-0.39%
HCSG	F	-0.39%
PDCO	F	-0.38%
NTCT	D	-0.37%
VSCO	D	-0.37%
TALO	D	-0.36%
SVC	F	-0.36%
ECPG	D	-0.36%
SEM	B	-0.35%
SMP	D	-0.35%
PSMT	A	-0.35%
VBTX	A	-0.35%
RNST	B	-0.35%
HBI	C	-0.35%
HUBG	B	-0.34%
NFBK	D	-0.34%
LUMN	F	-0.33%
PFS	B	-0.33%
TWI	F	-0.32%
RC	D	-0.32%
VFC	F	-0.31%
IBTX	F	-0.31%
ATNI	F	-0.3%
DCOM	B	-0.3%
HAFC	B	-0.29%
AVNS	C	-0.28%
HFWA	B	-0.28%
RGP	D	-0.28%
BRKL	F	-0.27%
CNSL	B	-0.27%
BKU	A	-0.27%
HVT	F	-0.27%
FLGT	F	-0.26%
PPBI	C	-0.26%
THS	D	-0.25%
TTEC	F	-0.24%
MEI	F	-0.22%
HAIN	F	-0.21%