RPV vs. XSHD ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio (XSHD)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.25

Average Daily Volume

263,877

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XSHD

PowerShares S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio

XSHD Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio is based on the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is composed of 60 securities in the S&P SmallCap 600 Index that have historically provided high dividend yields with lower volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted semi-annually on the last business day in January and July.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$15.00

Average Daily Volume

23,687

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	XSHD
30 Days	2.39%	3.71%
60 Days	-0.58%	0.15%
90 Days	5.45%	0.09%
12 Months	21.12%	3.54%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in XSHD	Overlap

RPV Overweight 95 Positions Relative to XSHD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	B	4.09%
BRK.A	C	3.47%
F	D	2.66%
UAL	B	2.56%
TSN	C	2.23%
MHK	C	2.16%
C	A	2.16%
PARA	C	2.15%
VTRS	D	2.13%
VLO	D	2.09%
KR	C	1.85%
BG	B	1.84%
CNC	C	1.83%
CFG	A	1.78%
IVZ	C	1.77%
WBA	F	1.72%
PSX	D	1.65%
WRK	A	1.63%
CVS	F	1.57%
KMX	D	1.52%
MCK	A	1.44%
CI	D	1.42%
BWA	B	1.39%
AAL	C	1.38%
NRG	A	1.36%
WBD	F	1.28%
HPE	D	1.27%
TFC	A	1.26%
COF	B	1.25%
IP	B	1.09%
SYF	B	1.07%
UHS	C	1.07%
WFC	A	1.05%
PRU	A	1.05%
CAH	F	1.05%
ADM	C	1.02%
MTB	A	1.01%
AIG	A	1.01%
BBY	D	1.0%
L	A	1.0%
BAC	A	0.99%
LUV	D	0.97%
KHC	C	0.95%
MOS	F	0.94%
HBAN	A	0.86%
BK	A	0.84%
KEY	B	0.81%
TAP	D	0.8%
RF	B	0.78%
STT	B	0.78%
IFF	A	0.74%
BEN	D	0.73%
T	B	0.73%
GS	A	0.72%
HIG	B	0.68%
MET	B	0.65%
DOW	B	0.64%
CMA	B	0.64%
FITB	A	0.6%
EQT	C	0.6%
SWK	D	0.58%
TGT	D	0.57%
AIZ	D	0.57%
VZ	C	0.57%
ELV	A	0.57%
CAG	B	0.56%
PNC	A	0.56%
EMN	A	0.54%
EVRG	B	0.54%
CTVA	B	0.53%
EG	C	0.53%
ARE	D	0.52%
LYB	C	0.52%
CINF	C	0.51%
SYY	D	0.51%
HSIC	C	0.51%
PFG	C	0.51%
ALL	B	0.51%
PNW	B	0.5%
ALB	C	0.5%
TRV	D	0.49%
KMI	A	0.49%
USB	D	0.49%
FDX	C	0.48%
ES	B	0.48%
CVX	A	0.48%
HPQ	C	0.46%
BIO	F	0.46%
FOXA	B	0.45%
LKQ	D	0.44%
CHRW	B	0.43%
NWSA	D	0.39%
HUM	D	0.34%
FOX	B	0.22%
NWS	D	0.12%

RPV Underweight 53 Positions Relative to XSHD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIW	B	-3.47%
OGN	B	-3.36%
EFC	B	-2.93%
IIPR	C	-2.88%
BXMT	F	-2.78%
RC	F	-2.77%
ARI	D	-2.76%
GNL	C	-2.75%
CALM	D	-2.64%
DEA	B	-2.5%
KW	C	-2.43%
VGR	C	-2.43%
KREF	F	-2.41%
SVC	F	-2.39%
DLX	A	-2.18%
CWEN	B	-2.08%
CVI	F	-2.08%
NUS	D	-2.01%
AVA	B	-1.96%
CBRL	F	-1.72%
AROC	B	-1.68%
NWN	B	-1.65%
TRN	A	-1.58%
NOG	C	-1.56%
XRX	D	-1.54%
MOV	D	-1.49%
ETD	D	-1.46%
UVV	B	-1.44%
DIN	F	-1.36%
CCOI	F	-1.24%
ENR	C	-1.22%
BHE	A	-1.19%
UTL	B	-1.16%
SPTN	D	-1.15%
MED	F	-1.15%
HNI	A	-1.14%
PINC	F	-1.12%
SXC	D	-1.11%
KMT	B	-1.1%
RGP	F	-1.1%
SXT	A	-1.02%
SLVM	C	-1.01%
HP	F	-0.99%
FDP	F	-0.93%
SEM	A	-0.93%
NHC	B	-0.85%
MYE	F	-0.82%
CPK	B	-0.79%
SEE	B	-0.79%
SJW	C	-0.77%
CRC	F	-0.67%
ATNI	F	-0.54%
CMP	F	-0.46%