DEEP vs. DBND ETF Comparison

Comparison of Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND)

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.66

Average Daily Volume

2,499

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

DBND

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF

DBND Description

Under normal circumstances, the Advisor intends to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in fixed income instruments or other investments with economic characteristics similar to fixed income instruments. It may invest in fixed income instruments of any credit quality, including those that are at the time of investment unrated or rated BB+ or lower by S&P or Ba1 or lower by Moody?s or the equivalent by any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.99

Average Daily Volume

33,545

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	DEEP	DBND
30 Days	-0.72%	-0.16%
60 Days	-0.87%	-1.19%
90 Days	-0.27%	-0.67%
12 Months	12.13%	0.40%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in DEEP	Weight in DBND	Overlap
	SSP	C	1.08%	0.16%	0.16%

DEEP Overweight 95 Positions Relative to DBND

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ULH	B	1.32%
ZUMZ	B	1.31%
TH	C	1.29%
AGX	A	1.27%
VIRT	A	1.18%
GSL	A	1.18%
NGVT	B	1.18%
GEO	B	1.16%
USLM	B	1.14%
LPG	B	1.13%
VSTO	A	1.13%
APOG	A	1.13%
CMRE	A	1.13%
GIII	D	1.12%
CLW	A	1.12%
PFBC	A	1.12%
CCB	B	1.11%
MYE	B	1.1%
TPB	A	1.09%
SMP	C	1.08%
PANL	C	1.08%
SBLK	A	1.07%
RMR	B	1.07%
WSBF	B	1.07%
PRG	B	1.07%
PRDO	A	1.07%
TK	B	1.07%
CLFD	B	1.07%
CCRN	F	1.07%
INVA	B	1.06%
CRCT	C	1.06%
BBSI	B	1.06%
TNK	B	1.06%
NRP	B	1.05%
DHT	B	1.05%
DHIL	C	1.04%
GRBK	C	1.04%
NVEC	F	1.03%
EBF	C	1.03%
HTBK	D	1.03%
HVT	F	1.02%
GTX	C	1.02%
BSIG	C	1.02%
AAN	F	1.01%
PLPC	F	1.01%
PLAB	C	1.0%
MCRI	D	1.0%
HLF	C	1.0%
VGR	D	1.0%
EIG	D	1.0%
MD	D	0.99%
DFIN	B	0.99%
BKE	C	0.99%
MOV	D	0.99%
NATR	C	0.99%
CNXN	D	0.99%
WGO	F	0.99%
IMKTA	F	0.99%
JBSS	F	0.98%
MHO	C	0.98%
CASS	D	0.97%
ITRN	C	0.97%
CUBI	D	0.96%
KFRC	F	0.95%
RMAX	F	0.95%
SXC	D	0.95%
MCFT	F	0.95%
AMSF	D	0.95%
TBBK	F	0.94%
ACCO	D	0.94%
USNA	F	0.94%
DIN	F	0.94%
IIIN	D	0.93%
TWI	F	0.93%
EPM	F	0.93%
AMCX	D	0.93%
HCKT	D	0.93%
NUS	F	0.92%
EVRI	F	0.91%
ETD	F	0.91%
RMNI	F	0.9%
IMMR	C	0.89%
SMLR	F	0.89%
BXC	D	0.89%
MBUU	F	0.87%
RGP	F	0.86%
PARR	F	0.85%
INMD	F	0.85%
HBI	F	0.83%
WNC	F	0.83%
RYI	F	0.82%
LPRO	F	0.79%
FWRD	F	0.77%
MED	F	0.74%
TTEC	F	0.71%

DEEP Underweight 53 Positions Relative to DBND

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UPST	D	-1.79%
COMM	F	-0.77%
BNS	D	-0.68%
GS	A	-0.66%
JPM	B	-0.62%
ABBV	D	-0.61%
DLTR	F	-0.59%
BAC	B	-0.56%
DFS	B	-0.49%
T	B	-0.48%
CVS	F	-0.42%
CCI	D	-0.38%
BMO	C	-0.38%
MAR	D	-0.38%
CMCSA	F	-0.38%
OC	A	-0.37%
NTAP	B	-0.37%
SO	A	-0.36%
BA	F	-0.35%
KMI	A	-0.35%
ARCC	A	-0.35%
MO	A	-0.34%
DKS	B	-0.34%
GM	B	-0.34%
SYY	D	-0.33%
PXD	B	-0.33%
RPRX	D	-0.32%
EXPE	F	-0.3%
ORCL	D	-0.3%
WTW	D	-0.29%
HCA	D	-0.29%
CCL	F	-0.26%
AAL	C	-0.19%
COTY	D	-0.19%
PENN	F	-0.19%
PFGC	D	-0.19%
POST	B	-0.18%
PK	D	-0.18%
GFF	C	-0.18%
MODV	D	-0.18%
SPH	D	-0.18%
UAL	B	-0.18%
PCG	B	-0.18%
NRG	A	-0.17%
VSCO	F	-0.17%
CHTR	F	-0.17%
CACC	D	-0.16%
UBER	D	-0.16%
BALY	B	-0.16%
OMI	F	-0.16%
OMF	B	-0.16%
GPOR	B	-0.16%
EXC	B	-0.09%