XTN vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)

XTN

SPDR S&P Transportation ETF

XTN Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the transportation segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the transportation industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$75.46

Average Daily Volume

10,507

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$96.74

Average Daily Volume

8,941

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XTN	CZA
30 Days	-9.66%	-4.16%
60 Days	-8.23%	0.12%
90 Days	-4.70%	3.50%
12 Months	4.98%	15.00%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XTN	Weight in CZA	Overlap
	JBHT	F	2.13%	1.36%	1.36%
	KEX	A	3.29%	0.45%	0.45%

XTN Overweight 41 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UAL	B	3.22%
ALK	B	3.17%
DAL	A	3.15%
SKYW	A	2.92%
FDX	B	2.83%
R	A	2.82%
GXO	F	2.73%
MATX	D	2.73%
GNK	A	2.65%
CHRW	D	2.61%
UPS	F	2.54%
JOBY	D	2.53%
UNP	C	2.53%
HUBG	D	2.51%
AAL	F	2.51%
ARCB	F	2.5%
LSTR	D	2.5%
EXPD	D	2.47%
NSC	D	2.45%
CAR	F	2.44%
SNDR	F	2.41%
XPO	D	2.38%
WERN	D	2.37%
LYFT	D	2.35%
CSX	D	2.34%
ODFL	F	2.28%
UBER	D	2.26%
KNX	F	2.19%
JBLU	F	2.16%
RXO	F	2.13%
ALGT	F	2.06%
LUV	F	2.06%
SAVE	F	2.04%
FWRD	F	1.95%
SAIA	F	1.87%
ATSG	F	1.87%
HTZ	F	1.6%
UHAL	C	1.38%
SNCY	F	1.33%
MRTN	D	0.99%
HTLD	D	0.65%

XTN Underweight 93 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIG	C	-2.31%
WAB	A	-2.24%
WTW	C	-2.13%
GLW	B	-2.13%
EQR	A	-1.99%
ZBH	D	-1.92%
DOV	A	-1.9%
DTE	A	-1.83%
ETR	A	-1.78%
VLTO	A	-1.74%
ES	A	-1.72%
STT	C	-1.7%
BAX	C	-1.64%
HUBB	D	-1.62%
MKC	B	-1.57%
WRB	D	-1.56%
CHKP	D	-1.54%
APTV	F	-1.5%
CINF	B	-1.48%
BAH	B	-1.47%
J	C	-1.42%
LDOS	A	-1.38%
CSL	A	-1.36%
TDY	D	-1.34%
AVY	B	-1.34%
WMG	C	-1.34%
IEX	D	-1.33%
LII	D	-1.27%
EG	D	-1.26%
SUI	D	-1.23%
GGG	D	-1.19%
CAG	A	-1.15%
TRMB	D	-1.14%
RPM	D	-1.08%
BAP	C	-1.07%
AMCR	A	-1.06%
LOGI	D	-1.03%
AOS	C	-1.0%
UDR	A	-0.99%
ACM	B	-0.97%
NI	A	-0.97%
CNA	B	-0.95%
GLPI	F	-0.94%
RNR	C	-0.94%
XP	F	-0.92%
NVT	B	-0.91%
FLEX	D	-0.89%
PFGC	D	-0.87%
REG	D	-0.87%
HII	C	-0.86%
RRX	D	-0.84%
DOX	D	-0.83%
EMN	B	-0.83%
SNX	A	-0.81%
MOS	F	-0.8%
ITT	B	-0.8%
QGEN	B	-0.77%
UNM	A	-0.77%
ALV	A	-0.76%
WEX	D	-0.76%
REXR	F	-0.74%
AIZ	C	-0.73%
SKX	A	-0.73%
ATR	A	-0.72%
WWD	A	-0.7%
CACI	A	-0.67%
SEIC	C	-0.67%
GNTX	D	-0.64%
INGR	B	-0.58%
ALSN	D	-0.53%
RHP	D	-0.51%
IVZ	F	-0.5%
VNT	D	-0.48%
RRR	D	-0.48%
G	F	-0.47%
ESAB	B	-0.47%
LFUS	D	-0.46%
ESNT	D	-0.44%
SON	C	-0.44%
ESI	D	-0.44%
ZWS	D	-0.43%
UGI	A	-0.43%
FLO	A	-0.41%
AXS	C	-0.41%
AMG	C	-0.41%
BLCO	F	-0.4%
JHG	C	-0.4%
MDU	A	-0.39%
FELE	D	-0.37%
ACT	A	-0.36%
CRUS	D	-0.36%
FUL	D	-0.32%
CPA	D	-0.31%