TMAT vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
TMAT

Main Thematic Innovation ETF

TMAT Description

The investment seeks to outperform the MSCI ACWI Index® in rising markets while limiting losses during periods of decline. The adviser seeks to achieve its objective through dynamic thematic rotation. The Adviser focuses its research primarily on identifying emerging, disruptive, and innovative themes that have a large market demand or addressable market. The Adviser rotates among themes with large addressable markets which may range from nascent technologies to those on the cusp of widespread adoption and buys securities of ETFs investing in those themes.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.77

Average Daily Volume

14,218

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.00

Average Daily Volume

67,595

Number of Holdings *

51

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period TMAT PGJ
30 Days -3.57% 7.36%
60 Days -4.93% 10.93%
90 Days 4.10% 21.09%
12 Months 26.24% 5.66%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in TMAT Weight in PGJ Overlap
TMAT Overweight 10 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
ARKF D 12.89%
SKYY C 11.38%
IPO D 11.01%
ESPO B 10.76%
QTUM C 10.7%
AIQ C 10.49%
ROBT D 9.19%
BITQ D 8.44%
ONLN A 7.84%
ARKG D 7.02%
TMAT Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA B -8.12%
TCOM A -7.97%
YUMC F -7.34%
BIDU C -7.28%
NTES C -5.86%
JD B -5.2%
TME A -4.85%
BEKE B -4.44%
ZTO B -4.37%
HTHT B -3.65%
BZ A -3.49%
VIPS D -3.25%
YMM A -3.25%
NIO D -3.15%
TAL B -2.88%
LI F -2.31%
IQ B -1.51%
QFIN A -1.5%
MNSO B -0.99%
ATHM C -0.98%
XPEV D -0.96%
DQ F -0.9%
BILI B -0.89%
HOLI D -0.87%
RLX B -0.78%
ATAT C -0.62%
CSIQ F -0.6%
GOTU C -0.58%
MOMO C -0.58%
JKS D -0.56%
FINV B -0.53%
WB C -0.47%
ZLAB F -0.45%
GDS C -0.42%
EH B -0.41%
TIGR D -0.28%
QD A -0.28%
HUYA B -0.24%
NOAH B -0.24%
SOHU B -0.23%
KC C -0.15%
VNET D -0.14%
LX D -0.14%
DADA D -0.13%
CAN F -0.12%
TUYA C -0.12%
DDL C -0.11%
API D -0.11%
ZH F -0.11%
DAO F -0.08%
IMAB F -0.07%
Compare ETFs