RFV vs. WFH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$126.73

Average Daily Volume

5,883

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WFH

Direxion Work From Home ETF

WFH Description

The Direxion Work From Home ETF offers exposure to companies across four technology pillars, allowing investors to gain exposure to those companies that stand to benefit from an increasingly flexible work environment. The four pillars include Cloud Technologies, Cybersecurity, Online Project and Document Management, and Remote Communications. Companies are selected for inclusion in the index by ARTIS, a proprietary natural language processing algorithm, which uses key words to evaluate large volumes of publicly available information, such as annual reports, business descriptions and financial news.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.15

Average Daily Volume

995

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	WFH
30 Days	6.42%	6.72%
60 Days	8.22%	11.10%
90 Days	8.16%	12.72%
12 Months	24.43%	29.02%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in WFH	Overlap
	SNX	D	2.39%	2.16%	2.16%

RFV Overweight 81 Positions Relative to WFH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	2.66%
AVT	C	2.59%
MTZ	B	2.59%
JLL	D	2.27%
THC	D	2.24%
USFD	A	2.07%
M	F	2.07%
UNM	A	2.02%
JWN	D	1.98%
X	B	1.97%
PPC	C	1.96%
AAL	B	1.92%
GHC	B	1.9%
ARW	D	1.9%
PFGC	B	1.86%
PBF	D	1.79%
AN	C	1.79%
AA	A	1.78%
WCC	B	1.75%
R	B	1.74%
TMHC	C	1.74%
JEF	A	1.7%
DINO	D	1.54%
ARMK	B	1.48%
GT	C	1.43%
MAN	F	1.42%
KD	B	1.42%
ASB	B	1.41%
KMPR	A	1.33%
RGA	A	1.27%
ALLY	C	1.24%
FYBR	C	1.23%
CUZ	B	1.22%
ZION	B	1.18%
CMC	B	1.15%
WHR	B	1.15%
PAG	B	1.15%
FLR	B	1.14%
COHR	B	1.13%
FNB	A	1.11%
FHN	A	1.03%
PVH	C	1.03%
THO	B	1.02%
KRC	B	0.99%
VLY	B	0.98%
JHG	B	0.92%
CLF	F	0.92%
TCBI	C	0.91%
ONB	C	0.89%
LEA	F	0.89%
PRGO	C	0.84%
POST	C	0.82%
PB	B	0.82%
VAC	C	0.8%
HOG	D	0.78%
CNH	C	0.78%
IRT	A	0.76%
CNO	B	0.74%
AR	B	0.71%
UGI	C	0.71%
GEF	A	0.68%
GAP	C	0.67%
WBS	A	0.67%
SWX	B	0.64%
BJ	A	0.63%
ENOV	C	0.62%
ORI	A	0.62%
BIO	C	0.59%
BKH	A	0.59%
OSK	C	0.58%
NVST	B	0.53%
FAF	A	0.52%
KNX	C	0.48%
BERY	C	0.48%
SR	A	0.47%
AGCO	D	0.45%
UAA	C	0.44%
NOV	C	0.42%
UA	C	0.41%
VSH	F	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.23%

RFV Underweight 39 Positions Relative to WFH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TEAM	A	-3.32%
HUBS	A	-3.04%
DOCU	B	-3.02%
CRM	B	-2.89%
ZS	B	-2.86%
CRWD	B	-2.86%
ORCL	A	-2.86%
PEGA	B	-2.81%
ATUS	B	-2.76%
MRVL	B	-2.76%
RNG	C	-2.72%
NOW	A	-2.68%
FTNT	C	-2.65%
AMZN	C	-2.63%
DDOG	A	-2.61%
ZM	C	-2.61%
S	B	-2.55%
NET	B	-2.54%
SMAR	B	-2.54%
CSCO	B	-2.51%
PANW	B	-2.46%
META	D	-2.43%
GOOGL	C	-2.42%
AVGO	D	-2.38%
MOMO	D	-2.34%
CYBR	A	-2.34%
NTCT	C	-2.32%
DOCN	C	-2.3%
YY	B	-2.29%
WDAY	B	-2.26%
BOX	B	-2.25%
MSFT	D	-2.25%
IBM	C	-2.21%
OKTA	C	-2.2%
NTAP	C	-2.14%
VZ	C	-2.12%
VRNS	D	-2.04%
ADBE	C	-1.98%
XRX	F	-1.66%