RFG vs. XMVM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.34

Average Daily Volume

56,027

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

XMVM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to track the performance of approximately 80 stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® that have the highest “value” and “momentum” scores.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.67

Average Daily Volume

23,114

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	XMVM
30 Days	-0.30%	-1.62%
60 Days	1.88%	2.12%
90 Days	16.20%	7.59%
12 Months	39.51%	28.83%

15 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in XMVM	Overlap
CHRD	B	1.45%	1.28%	1.28%
CIVI	B	1.2%	1.27%	1.2%
CNX	B	2.46%	1.95%	1.95%
MTDR	D	1.02%	0.95%	0.95%
MUSA	D	1.57%	0.97%	0.97%
OC	A	1.55%	0.93%	0.93%
PR	B	2.12%	1.15%	1.15%
RRC	B	1.49%	1.14%	1.14%
RS	D	1.26%	0.87%	0.87%
SWN	B	2.54%	1.87%	1.87%
TOL	B	1.83%	1.74%	1.74%
UFPI	C	1.03%	0.79%	0.79%
VST	B	2.59%	1.6%	1.6%
VVV	C	1.25%	1.05%	1.05%
WLK	B	1.05%	0.96%	0.96%

RFG Overweight 66 Positions Relative to XMVM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DUOL	A	2.53%
CELH	D	2.41%
WFRD	B	2.35%
BLD	D	2.09%
ELF	D	2.09%
FIX	A	2.05%
WING	A	1.95%
MEDP	C	1.94%
APPF	B	1.84%
H	D	1.71%
EME	A	1.61%
PK	D	1.5%
OVV	B	1.48%
EXP	A	1.42%
RMBS	F	1.4%
VAL	C	1.4%
ONTO	A	1.4%
KNSL	F	1.31%
CLH	A	1.3%
SSD	D	1.29%
NVT	A	1.25%
LNTH	B	1.22%
DT	D	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
WSM	B	1.12%
TXRH	B	1.12%
FND	D	1.07%
SKX	B	1.06%
CROX	C	1.06%
ESAB	B	1.01%
SAIA	F	0.99%
TPX	D	0.99%
LII	D	0.98%
GTLS	B	0.98%
TREX	D	0.97%
NEU	D	0.97%
CASY	A	0.96%
QLYS	D	0.93%
PSTG	C	0.92%
EXEL	D	0.91%
LECO	D	0.88%
LOPE	B	0.86%
MANH	D	0.86%
WSO	B	0.82%
WMS	C	0.82%
OLED	C	0.82%
AIT	C	0.81%
PRI	D	0.81%
VNT	D	0.77%
COKE	B	0.77%
PGNY	F	0.75%
ACHC	F	0.74%
LNW	C	0.71%
RBC	C	0.69%
ARWR	F	0.69%
GDDY	A	0.66%
PLNT	D	0.63%
BCO	B	0.63%
FIVE	F	0.61%
PEN	F	0.6%
COTY	F	0.59%
DBX	F	0.56%
FCN	B	0.51%
CAR	D	0.49%
HALO	C	0.49%
BYD	F	0.46%

RFG Underweight 63 Positions Relative to XMVM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	D	-3.34%
AVT	A	-2.54%
DINO	F	-2.29%
ARW	B	-2.27%
AN	B	-2.27%
SNX	A	-2.2%
TMHC	C	-2.03%
LAD	D	-1.92%
UNM	B	-1.9%
X	D	-1.87%
KBH	C	-1.75%
CMC	C	-1.74%
THC	A	-1.69%
MDU	A	-1.58%
AMG	D	-1.56%
R	A	-1.52%
PFGC	D	-1.47%
RGA	A	-1.45%
ADNT	F	-1.43%
USFD	C	-1.41%
PAG	F	-1.38%
MTG	C	-1.37%
PPC	A	-1.32%
ARMK	C	-1.31%
TCBI	B	-1.3%
JEF	B	-1.28%
GT	F	-1.26%
TEX	C	-1.26%
CLF	F	-1.24%
ESNT	C	-1.2%
JHG	A	-1.19%
LEA	F	-1.19%
AGCO	D	-1.17%
RNR	D	-1.16%
THO	D	-1.14%
OSK	D	-1.11%
MUR	B	-1.1%
ORI	A	-1.09%
VSH	C	-1.08%
SF	A	-1.06%
KEX	A	-1.05%
GEF	D	-1.03%
PVH	D	-1.01%
INGR	A	-0.98%
FLR	C	-0.96%
BDC	C	-0.94%
ALE	B	-0.93%
TKR	B	-0.92%
NWE	B	-0.85%
KD	D	-0.83%
AMKR	C	-0.82%
BERY	D	-0.82%
BC	D	-0.79%
WERN	D	-0.76%
VOYA	B	-0.76%
ENS	B	-0.75%
CNO	B	-0.73%
SAIC	C	-0.72%
CRI	F	-0.71%
FAF	D	-0.7%
KNX	D	-0.69%
HELE	F	-0.62%
NYCB	D	-0.61%