CZAR vs. RNDV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) to First Trust US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV)

CZAR

Themes Natural Monopoly ETF

CZAR Description

The index is designed to provide exposure to companies in the large- and mid- capitalization segments that exhibit a strong competitive advantage in their respective sector. The fund will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that comprise the index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.85

Average Daily Volume

322

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RNDV

First Trust US Equity Dividend Select ETF

RNDV Description

The US Equity Dividend Select ETF (the "Fund") seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the Fund's fees and expenses) of an equity index called the Nasdaq Riskalyze US Equity Dividend Select Index (the "Index"). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets (including investment borrowings) in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Fund, using an indexing investment approach, attempts to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Index. The Fund's investment advisor seeks a correlation of 0.95 or better (before fees and expenses) between the Fund's performance and the performance of the Index; a figure of 1.00 would represent perfect correlation. The Index is owned and is developed, maintained and sponsored by Riskalyze, Inc. (the "Index Provider").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.72

Average Daily Volume

7,095

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CZAR	RNDV
30 Days	1.67%	0.09%
60 Days	1.36%	2.01%
90 Days	3.36%	4.31%
12 Months		25.40%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CZAR	Weight in RNDV	Overlap
ADI	D	3.04%	1.81%	1.81%
BLK	C	3.7%	0.75%	0.75%
BMY	B	2.61%	1.85%	1.85%
CMCSA	B	0.52%	1.71%	0.52%
CVX	A	0.67%	0.85%	0.67%
DGX	A	0.31%	0.74%	0.31%
GPC	D	0.15%	1.42%	0.15%
KVUE	A	1.3%	0.75%	0.75%
SNA	A	0.7%	0.69%	0.69%
VZ	C	0.27%	3.4%	0.27%

CZAR Overweight 35 Positions Relative to RNDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSCO	B	3.99%
APO	B	3.87%
META	D	3.57%
AXP	A	3.46%
FTV	C	3.34%
AJG	B	3.16%
OTEX	D	3.0%
ADBE	C	2.99%
GILD	C	2.49%
VRTX	F	1.91%
PG	A	1.01%
AME	A	1.01%
PEP	F	1.0%
KO	D	0.98%
XYL	D	0.78%
CPAY	A	0.63%
CHTR	C	0.62%
GPN	B	0.54%
MA	C	0.53%
V	A	0.52%
EXC	C	0.49%
ROL	B	0.48%
LKQ	D	0.48%
ABNB	C	0.41%
ECL	D	0.39%
WCN	A	0.39%
UBER	D	0.37%
LIN	D	0.37%
FDX	B	0.36%
CNI	D	0.35%
STLA	F	0.35%
VMC	B	0.33%
T	A	0.32%
IQV	D	0.26%
RSG	A	0.24%

CZAR Underweight 85 Positions Relative to RNDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HPQ	B	-3.91%
IBM	C	-3.57%
HPE	B	-3.47%
TXN	C	-3.28%
GLW	B	-3.05%
QCOM	F	-2.43%
MCHP	D	-2.41%
BEN	C	-2.16%
IPG	D	-2.14%
ACN	C	-2.01%
HAS	D	-1.63%
CVS	D	-1.57%
TROW	B	-1.57%
BBY	D	-1.55%
OMC	C	-1.48%
PRU	A	-1.43%
APH	A	-1.26%
UPS	C	-1.15%
NTRS	A	-1.15%
MDT	D	-1.11%
MTB	A	-1.09%
JNJ	D	-1.08%
PFG	D	-1.05%
HD	A	-1.02%
ABBV	D	-1.02%
MCD	D	-1.01%
GRMN	B	-0.99%
MSFT	F	-0.94%
MRK	F	-0.92%
PM	B	-0.91%
OKE	A	-0.9%
KLAC	D	-0.86%
MET	A	-0.85%
CINF	A	-0.85%
CAG	D	-0.8%
LOW	D	-0.77%
TSN	B	-0.74%
CAH	B	-0.73%
NKE	D	-0.72%
PAYX	C	-0.72%
ABT	B	-0.72%
KMB	D	-0.7%
HRL	D	-0.69%
CTRA	B	-0.68%
CME	A	-0.67%
EG	C	-0.64%
SWK	D	-0.62%
CI	F	-0.61%
GIS	D	-0.61%
TRV	B	-0.6%
CMI	A	-0.6%
ITW	B	-0.59%
K	A	-0.58%
FAST	B	-0.58%
AMCR	D	-0.58%
EOG	A	-0.58%
AFL	B	-0.58%
XOM	B	-0.58%
CHRW	C	-0.57%
UNH	C	-0.56%
EMR	A	-0.56%
POOL	C	-0.55%
BDX	F	-0.55%
NSC	B	-0.55%
UNP	C	-0.54%
ADP	B	-0.51%
LMT	D	-0.5%
EVRG	A	-0.48%
O	D	-0.48%
LHX	C	-0.48%
LEN	D	-0.46%
PNW	B	-0.45%
FMC	D	-0.45%
ES	D	-0.43%
ETR	B	-0.41%
MAA	B	-0.4%
FRT	B	-0.4%
EMN	D	-0.4%
EIX	B	-0.39%
AEP	D	-0.37%
ESS	B	-0.36%
DLR	B	-0.36%
APD	A	-0.35%
CF	B	-0.35%
AVB	B	-0.32%