ZECP vs. BIBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL)
ZECP

Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF

ZECP Description

The Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF seeks to provide long-term total returns and minimize capital loss. The Fund pursues its investment objective by constructing a portfolio of companies that exhibit a track record of moving through recessionary periods with little to minimal impact on aggregate earnings growth relative to the overall equity market.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.56

Average Daily Volume

36,313

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BIBL

Inspire 100 ETF

BIBL Description The investment seeks to replicate investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the Inspire 100 Index. The index provider selects domestic large capitalization equity securities using the index provider's Inspire Impact ScoreĀ®, a proprietary selection methodology that is designed to assign a score to a particular security based on the security's alignment with biblical values and the positive impact that company has on the world through various environmental, social and governance criterion.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$38.48

Average Daily Volume

80,614

Number of Holdings *

99

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ZECP BIBL
30 Days 6.30% 5.37%
60 Days 3.48% 1.54%
90 Days 6.49% 5.37%
12 Months 19.70% 25.49%
9 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ZECP Weight in BIBL Overlap
CAT C 2.85% 4.87% 2.85%
CTAS B 1.95% 1.86% 1.86%
JBL F 1.15% 0.49% 0.49%
MCHP B 0.81% 1.5% 0.81%
MOH F 0.99% 0.59% 0.59%
PLD F 0.72% 3.0% 0.72%
RSG D 1.83% 1.67% 1.67%
SLB F 0.63% 1.95% 0.63%
SNPS C 2.93% 2.44% 2.44%
ZECP Overweight 44 Positions Relative to BIBL
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT B 6.91%
AAPL C 6.28%
GOOGL A 5.46%
PG A 3.17%
UNH C 3.0%
JPM A 2.83%
LLY B 2.71%
AXP A 2.6%
HD D 2.52%
MMC A 2.18%
WMT A 2.14%
PEP B 2.14%
NFLX B 1.98%
HIG A 1.93%
AEP A 1.93%
AMP B 1.92%
HSY C 1.75%
MRK B 1.71%
ACN F 1.7%
AMGN B 1.63%
JNJ D 1.57%
VRTX B 1.52%
MET A 1.51%
HON B 1.47%
INTU B 1.44%
MAR D 1.4%
MCO A 1.36%
TMO B 1.27%
ORCL C 1.22%
TXN B 1.2%
ABT F 1.17%
SYK D 1.15%
SO A 1.14%
PNC B 1.08%
GD A 1.05%
MCD F 1.04%
BSX A 1.03%
NEE B 0.96%
DHR A 0.88%
CHD B 0.87%
LH D 0.84%
BLK B 0.8%
CAH F 0.68%
CMCSA F 0.01%
ZECP Underweight 90 Positions Relative to BIBL
Symbol Grade Weight
ISRG B -3.82%
PGR C -3.53%
KLAC B -2.86%
ANET B -2.78%
APH B -2.16%
FCX A -2.07%
PH D -2.0%
EMR B -1.86%
ROP C -1.6%
SMCI D -1.58%
PCAR D -1.55%
IBKR A -1.46%
SPG C -1.39%
FTNT D -1.38%
NEM B -1.37%
DLR C -1.33%
PAYX B -1.3%
IDXX C -1.26%
URI C -1.26%
IQV D -1.24%
KMI A -1.22%
CPAY D -1.19%
ODFL F -1.15%
NUE D -1.13%
MSCI F -1.12%
MPWR C -1.07%
VRSK A -1.04%
ON D -0.99%
FICO A -0.98%
FANG C -0.98%
VEEV D -0.97%
CSGP D -0.95%
EXR C -0.93%
MTD B -0.91%
RMD B -0.9%
DVN D -0.87%
ANSS D -0.79%
KEYS C -0.75%
EQR B -0.75%
DOV B -0.75%
WST F -0.74%
STE C -0.71%
TRGP A -0.71%
FCNCA B -0.69%
ETR B -0.68%
NTAP B -0.65%
GPC D -0.63%
ARE C -0.62%
INVH B -0.62%
TYL B -0.6%
BLDR D -0.58%
ENTG D -0.57%
VTR B -0.56%
STLD D -0.56%
FSLR C -0.55%
CNP B -0.54%
CSL B -0.54%
TER B -0.53%
WSO B -0.52%
CMS A -0.52%
NTNX B -0.51%
ATO B -0.51%
JBHT F -0.51%
OKTA D -0.5%
L B -0.49%
EME B -0.48%
ENPH D -0.46%
ALB D -0.45%
NDSN C -0.44%
SWKS F -0.44%
SUI F -0.44%
CAG C -0.42%
AGR D -0.41%
TRMB D -0.4%
HST D -0.39%
INCY D -0.39%
MANH D -0.39%
UDR C -0.38%
WPC C -0.38%
EVRG C -0.36%
AOS D -0.36%
EPAM F -0.35%
LW F -0.35%
ELS D -0.35%
RL D -0.3%
LSCC F -0.29%
CFLT C -0.29%
GNTX D -0.23%
DAR D -0.2%
PVH D -0.19%
Compare ETFs