TMDV vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

TMDV

ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF

TMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Russell 3000® Dividend Elite Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by FTSE International Limited, targets companies that are currently members of the Russell 3000 Index, have increased dividend payments each year for at least 35 years, and meet certain liquidity requirements. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.56

Average Daily Volume

418

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.47

Average Daily Volume

13,233

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TMDV	RFV
30 Days	0.13%	-1.89%
60 Days	-0.02%	1.34%
90 Days	-1.26%	-2.53%
12 Months	4.49%	16.11%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TMDV	Weight in RFV	Overlap
BKH	C	1.6%	0.53%	0.53%
LEG	F	0.88%	0.23%	0.23%
ORI	C	1.61%	0.55%	0.55%
UGI	D	1.43%	0.73%	0.73%

TMDV Overweight 61 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ABM	B	1.92%
CSL	A	1.86%
APD	C	1.82%
WMT	A	1.8%
KMB	A	1.79%
NFG	C	1.74%
CL	A	1.74%
ADM	C	1.74%
MMM	B	1.72%
AFL	A	1.71%
DOV	A	1.68%
KO	A	1.65%
PG	A	1.65%
CWT	C	1.63%
ED	C	1.63%
TROW	B	1.62%
ATO	B	1.61%
CBSH	C	1.61%
MKC	D	1.6%
SON	D	1.59%
FRT	C	1.58%
PEP	D	1.58%
CINF	C	1.57%
CVX	C	1.57%
SPGI	B	1.57%
MSA	C	1.56%
FUL	B	1.55%
MSEX	D	1.55%
EMR	C	1.55%
BDX	C	1.55%
AWR	D	1.54%
ADP	A	1.54%
UHT	B	1.53%
RPM	C	1.53%
RLI	C	1.52%
UVV	D	1.52%
MDT	D	1.5%
SCL	D	1.5%
NWN	F	1.5%
SWK	D	1.48%
GWW	D	1.47%
GPC	D	1.47%
LOW	C	1.46%
TGT	D	1.46%
ITW	D	1.45%
SJW	F	1.45%
LANC	C	1.44%
PPG	D	1.44%
UBSI	D	1.44%
HRL	D	1.44%
SYY	C	1.43%
CLX	D	1.42%
JNJ	D	1.41%
SHW	D	1.41%
NDSN	D	1.37%
MCD	D	1.37%
ABT	D	1.36%
NUE	F	1.3%
BEN	D	1.27%
WBA	D	1.1%
SOLV	F	0.23%

TMDV Underweight 84 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SNX	B	-2.97%
AVT	B	-2.79%
PBF	F	-2.68%
M	C	-2.63%
MTZ	C	-2.26%
ARW	C	-2.25%
X	F	-2.18%
DINO	D	-2.05%
THC	B	-2.05%
JWN	B	-2.03%
JLL	B	-1.98%
AN	C	-1.95%
LAD	F	-1.95%
GT	F	-1.86%
USFD	B	-1.8%
MAN	D	-1.75%
AA	B	-1.75%
PFGC	D	-1.6%
GHC	D	-1.57%
PPC	C	-1.5%
UNM	C	-1.5%
ADNT	F	-1.49%
WCC	D	-1.49%
ALLY	B	-1.48%
TMHC	D	-1.47%
ARMK	A	-1.4%
KD	C	-1.38%
MDU	A	-1.37%
R	B	-1.36%
CLF	F	-1.28%
RGA	B	-1.23%
KMPR	C	-1.21%
PVH	C	-1.21%
ASB	C	-1.16%
JEF	B	-1.16%
LEA	F	-1.15%
PAG	D	-1.13%
FLR	B	-1.1%
CMC	C	-1.06%
CUZ	C	-1.0%
WHR	D	-0.97%
FYBR	C	-0.96%
FNB	C	-0.94%
THO	F	-0.92%
COHR	B	-0.9%
ZION	C	-0.89%
HOG	D	-0.88%
KRC	D	-0.87%
PRGO	F	-0.86%
GPS	C	-0.84%
HTZ	F	-0.83%
POST	C	-0.83%
AR	C	-0.82%
PENN	C	-0.8%
VAC	F	-0.79%
FHN	C	-0.79%
CHK	D	-0.74%
JHG	B	-0.73%
BJ	B	-0.71%
ONB	C	-0.71%
IRT	A	-0.71%
VLY	D	-0.7%
GEF	F	-0.68%
SWX	C	-0.67%
ENOV	F	-0.66%
PB	D	-0.64%
TGNA	D	-0.64%
TCBI	C	-0.64%
OSK	D	-0.59%
CNO	C	-0.55%
AGCO	F	-0.54%
VSH	F	-0.53%
NOV	D	-0.51%
WBS	D	-0.5%
NVST	F	-0.49%
BERY	B	-0.48%
WERN	F	-0.48%
FAF	D	-0.46%
SR	C	-0.45%
KNX	D	-0.43%
NYCB	F	-0.39%
CNXC	D	-0.36%
UAA	C	-0.34%
UA	C	-0.34%