PGJ vs. LEAD ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Realty Shares DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.44

Average Daily Volume

68,429

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LEAD

Realty Shares DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

LEAD Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation by tracking the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Reality Shares DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund&#39;s assets will be invested in component securities of the benchmark index. The benchmark index is designed to capitalize on the theory that, over time, companies that consistently grow their dividends tend to have investment returns above the overall market. It is designed to select the companies that have the highest probability of increasing their dividend in a 12-month period. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.29

Average Daily Volume

3,834

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	LEAD
30 Days	6.61%	-2.38%
60 Days	8.18%	-2.25%
90 Days	13.28%	1.33%
12 Months	2.69%	23.45%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in LEAD	Overlap

PGJ Overweight 51 Positions Relative to LEAD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	8.12%
TCOM	B	7.97%
YUMC	F	7.34%
BIDU	C	7.28%
NTES	D	5.86%
JD	B	5.2%
TME	B	4.85%
BEKE	B	4.44%
ZTO	C	4.37%
HTHT	B	3.65%
BZ	B	3.49%
VIPS	F	3.25%
YMM	B	3.25%
NIO	C	3.15%
TAL	B	2.88%
LI	F	2.31%
IQ	B	1.51%
QFIN	A	1.5%
MNSO	B	0.99%
ATHM	B	0.98%
XPEV	F	0.96%
DQ	F	0.9%
BILI	B	0.89%
HOLI	D	0.87%
RLX	B	0.78%
ATAT	C	0.62%
CSIQ	F	0.6%
GOTU	C	0.58%
MOMO	C	0.58%
JKS	D	0.56%
FINV	B	0.53%
WB	C	0.47%
ZLAB	F	0.45%
GDS	C	0.42%
EH	B	0.41%
TIGR	D	0.28%
QD	B	0.28%
HUYA	B	0.24%
NOAH	B	0.24%
SOHU	B	0.23%
KC	C	0.15%
VNET	C	0.14%
LX	C	0.14%
DADA	F	0.13%
CAN	F	0.12%
TUYA	C	0.12%
DDL	C	0.11%
API	B	0.11%
ZH	F	0.11%
DAO	F	0.08%
IMAB	C	0.07%

PGJ Underweight 65 Positions Relative to LEAD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MCK	A	-2.55%
LHX	A	-2.24%
MA	D	-2.16%
HSY	B	-2.09%
NDSN	C	-2.07%
SHW	D	-2.0%
EOG	B	-1.89%
DG	D	-1.87%
NUE	D	-1.8%
V	D	-1.76%
GWW	D	-1.65%
AAPL	B	-1.63%
DPZ	B	-1.6%
CL	A	-1.6%
TSCO	B	-1.59%
TMO	D	-1.59%
AFL	A	-1.58%
UI	D	-1.56%
DHR	C	-1.56%
BRO	C	-1.55%
TXN	A	-1.54%
WCN	D	-1.52%
DFS	C	-1.52%
DHI	D	-1.48%
HPQ	D	-1.47%
MSFT	D	-1.47%
AVGO	D	-1.46%
ADI	A	-1.45%
KLAC	B	-1.43%
A	D	-1.42%
CDW	D	-1.4%
ODFL	F	-1.39%
ABT	D	-1.39%
FDS	D	-1.36%
SPGI	C	-1.36%
JBHT	D	-1.36%
WST	D	-1.36%
APH	A	-1.34%
MCO	C	-1.33%
EXPD	D	-1.32%
MS	A	-1.31%
MPWR	B	-1.31%
AVY	A	-1.31%
BAX	F	-1.3%
GS	A	-1.29%
PH	B	-1.29%
LOW	D	-1.28%
HD	D	-1.28%
CSX	D	-1.27%
SSNC	C	-1.25%
POOL	D	-1.25%
WSM	B	-1.24%
BBY	D	-1.24%
QCOM	B	-1.21%
SWKS	F	-1.18%
BEN	F	-1.18%
ALLY	B	-1.18%
NKE	D	-1.13%
CE	C	-1.13%
INTU	C	-1.13%
LRCX	D	-1.11%
TER	B	-1.06%
TGT	D	-1.06%
TROW	D	-1.02%
AMAT	C	-0.99%