LCDS vs. EQRR ETF Comparison

Comparison of JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) to ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR)

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large, well established companies. Many of the equity securities in the fund"s portfolio will be technology companies or companies that rely heavily on technological advances. In managing the fund, the adviser employs a fundamental data science enabled investment approach that combines research, data insights, and risk management. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.58

Average Daily Volume

109

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

EQRR

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

EQRR Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Nasdaq U.S. Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index (the index). The fund invests in securities that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should track the performance of the index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. The index consists of 50 companies whose stock prices historically have tended to outperform the Universe during periods of rising interest rates.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.69

Average Daily Volume

778

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LCDS	EQRR
30 Days	2.99%	6.99%
60 Days	5.00%	7.58%
90 Days	6.45%	7.33%
12 Months		26.30%

8 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in LCDS	Weight in EQRR	Overlap
AZO	C	0.54%	1.33%	0.54%
COP	C	1.02%	3.0%	1.02%
EOG	A	1.14%	3.11%	1.14%
HLT	A	0.63%	1.51%	0.63%
LIN	D	0.13%	0.89%	0.13%
MET	A	0.91%	1.94%	0.91%
WFC	A	2.44%	2.51%	2.44%
XOM	B	1.79%	2.96%	1.79%

LCDS Overweight 79 Positions Relative to EQRR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	C	7.58%
MSFT	F	7.47%
AAPL	C	5.88%
AMZN	C	4.7%
META	D	3.39%
GOOGL	C	3.04%
UNH	C	2.16%
MA	C	1.98%
ABBV	D	1.51%
BMY	B	1.47%
SYK	C	1.47%
AXP	A	1.46%
PM	B	1.45%
BAC	A	1.34%
LOW	D	1.33%
TT	A	1.32%
AVGO	D	1.31%
CRM	B	1.25%
CMCSA	B	1.24%
UPS	C	1.22%
HWM	A	1.15%
TSLA	B	1.14%
AMP	A	1.13%
HON	B	1.12%
LLY	F	1.11%
CSX	B	1.1%
PGR	A	1.02%
MDLZ	F	0.99%
NXPI	D	0.93%
REGN	F	0.89%
INTU	C	0.88%
NOC	D	0.87%
SO	D	0.87%
MU	D	0.87%
MCD	D	0.87%
CME	A	0.76%
DHR	F	0.76%
BRK.A	B	0.75%
SQ	B	0.75%
NEE	D	0.73%
KO	D	0.73%
DOV	A	0.71%
FICO	B	0.71%
DD	D	0.71%
DLR	B	0.7%
STX	D	0.7%
TMUS	B	0.69%
PCG	A	0.69%
APH	A	0.68%
MS	A	0.66%
MDT	D	0.66%
AXTA	A	0.66%
TFC	A	0.64%
SPOT	B	0.62%
PLD	D	0.61%
CI	F	0.6%
CMS	C	0.59%
HPE	B	0.58%
CMG	B	0.55%
DE	A	0.54%
LDOS	C	0.53%
TJX	A	0.53%
CTSH	B	0.48%
PFGC	B	0.47%
VRTX	F	0.45%
FCNCA	A	0.41%
ELAN	D	0.39%
WEX	D	0.38%
BJ	A	0.36%
MTG	C	0.35%
COST	B	0.34%
SNPS	B	0.32%
CHD	B	0.3%
EQIX	A	0.25%
LRCX	F	0.22%
MSI	B	0.21%
SBUX	A	0.14%
APTV	D	0.11%
EL	F	0.1%

LCDS Underweight 42 Positions Relative to EQRR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CTRA	B	-3.25%
HAL	C	-3.13%
MCK	B	-3.02%
FANG	D	-3.01%
SLB	C	-2.93%
VLO	C	-2.91%
PSX	C	-2.82%
MPC	D	-2.74%
LPLA	A	-2.62%
MO	A	-2.57%
COR	B	-2.56%
RJF	A	-2.5%
CTVA	C	-2.43%
UAL	A	-2.29%
JPM	A	-2.18%
CVS	D	-2.18%
STZ	D	-2.18%
BG	F	-2.12%
HSY	F	-2.12%
CPB	D	-2.11%
ADM	D	-2.08%
WRB	A	-2.06%
RGA	A	-1.99%
PRU	A	-1.96%
AIG	B	-1.94%
HIG	B	-1.92%
DAL	C	-1.73%
GM	B	-1.68%
MAR	B	-1.57%
FOXA	B	-1.55%
ORLY	B	-1.47%
UBER	D	-1.29%
GPC	D	-1.22%
IP	B	-1.13%
STLD	B	-1.08%
FAST	B	-1.08%
RS	B	-1.02%
CF	B	-0.99%
NUE	C	-0.94%
WLK	D	-0.81%
FCX	D	-0.8%
LYB	F	-0.8%