IPDP vs. SEMI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.52

Average Daily Volume

1,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SEMI

Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF

SEMI Description

SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.86

Average Daily Volume

5,286

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	SEMI
30 Days	-5.51%	-5.89%
60 Days	-2.32%	-3.15%
90 Days	1.45%	7.64%
12 Months	23.41%	38.92%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in SEMI	Overlap
AVGO	D	2.41%	6.78%	2.41%
KLAC	C	2.22%	4.14%	2.22%
QCOM	C	2.26%	3.16%	2.26%

IPDP Overweight 46 Positions Relative to SEMI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	B	2.5%
APOG	A	2.38%
APH	A	2.37%
TT	A	2.36%
DOV	A	2.33%
HIG	C	2.32%
TRV	C	2.23%
DCI	B	2.16%
ITT	B	2.15%
CTAS	A	2.15%
RGA	A	2.15%
HI	F	2.15%
MCK	A	2.14%
GWW	D	2.13%
A	C	2.13%
GPC	B	2.09%
ELV	A	2.08%
SYK	D	2.07%
SEIC	C	2.04%
SHW	D	2.02%
BRC	A	2.01%
FAST	C	2.01%
AIT	D	1.98%
MSI	B	1.97%
AOS	C	1.96%
HD	D	1.94%
CSX	D	1.94%
ABM	A	1.92%
ADP	B	1.91%
ABT	D	1.89%
PAYX	C	1.87%
WTS	C	1.85%
ROK	F	1.81%
MMC	C	1.81%
CAH	D	1.8%
CSCO	D	1.79%
UPS	F	1.79%
JNJ	D	1.77%
NSP	B	1.76%
SNA	D	1.76%
CHE	D	1.75%
ACN	F	1.69%
UNH	B	1.64%
AAPL	F	1.6%
GL	D	1.15%
HUM	F	1.08%

IPDP Underweight 30 Positions Relative to SEMI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LRCX	D	-7.94%
SMTC	A	-5.87%
NVDA	C	-4.8%
AMAT	D	-4.47%
MRVL	D	-4.47%
ADI	A	-4.46%
NXPI	B	-4.0%
ON	D	-3.81%
MU	B	-3.69%
MCHP	A	-3.28%
TER	A	-3.12%
WDC	A	-3.01%
INDI	D	-2.92%
TSM	C	-2.7%
QRVO	C	-2.33%
SYNA	D	-2.18%
STM	F	-2.01%
INTC	F	-1.97%
AEIS	D	-1.9%
BE	B	-1.72%
CDNS	D	-1.45%
SNPS	D	-1.45%
SWKS	F	-1.26%
SGH	D	-0.98%
AMD	D	-0.73%
ICHR	D	-0.64%
MKSI	C	-0.54%
KLIC	F	-0.49%
DIOD	B	-0.48%
ENTG	D	-0.43%