IPDP vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.87

Average Daily Volume

1,314

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$114.00

Average Daily Volume

19,426

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	RFV
30 Days	-3.61%	-4.10%
60 Days	-0.36%	0.15%
90 Days	3.49%	1.01%
12 Months	29.12%	27.27%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in RFV	Overlap
	RGA	A	2.15%	1.12%	1.12%

IPDP Overweight 48 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	A	2.5%
AVGO	D	2.41%
APOG	A	2.38%
APH	A	2.37%
TT	A	2.36%
DOV	A	2.33%
HIG	D	2.32%
QCOM	A	2.26%
TRV	C	2.23%
KLAC	B	2.22%
DCI	B	2.16%
ITT	D	2.15%
CTAS	A	2.15%
HI	F	2.15%
MCK	C	2.14%
GWW	D	2.13%
A	C	2.13%
GPC	B	2.09%
ELV	B	2.08%
SYK	D	2.07%
SEIC	C	2.04%
SHW	D	2.02%
BRC	B	2.01%
FAST	D	2.01%
AIT	C	1.98%
MSI	A	1.97%
AOS	D	1.96%
HD	D	1.94%
CSX	D	1.94%
ABM	B	1.92%
ADP	D	1.91%
ABT	D	1.89%
PAYX	D	1.87%
WTS	C	1.85%
ROK	F	1.81%
MMC	D	1.81%
CAH	F	1.8%
CSCO	F	1.79%
UPS	F	1.79%
JNJ	F	1.77%
NSP	D	1.76%
SNA	D	1.76%
CHE	F	1.75%
ACN	F	1.69%
UNH	C	1.64%
AAPL	C	1.6%
GL	F	1.15%
HUM	F	1.08%

IPDP Underweight 87 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	C	-3.56%
M	C	-2.64%
SNX	A	-2.62%
AVT	A	-2.61%
ARW	B	-2.27%
DINO	F	-2.24%
X	F	-2.14%
LAD	F	-1.99%
GT	D	-1.98%
AN	B	-1.89%
MAN	B	-1.83%
MTZ	B	-1.8%
JWN	B	-1.79%
ADNT	F	-1.78%
AA	A	-1.74%
USFD	C	-1.72%
JLL	C	-1.69%
PFGC	D	-1.59%
CLF	F	-1.55%
GHC	B	-1.54%
UNM	A	-1.52%
TMHC	C	-1.52%
PPC	A	-1.5%
THC	A	-1.46%
ALLY	A	-1.43%
WCC	C	-1.42%
R	A	-1.38%
LEA	F	-1.36%
MDU	A	-1.34%
ARMK	C	-1.32%
HTZ	F	-1.26%
ASB	A	-1.22%
PVH	D	-1.19%
PAG	D	-1.18%
KMPR	B	-1.18%
CMC	C	-1.13%
PRGO	B	-1.09%
JEF	B	-1.08%
KD	D	-1.06%
WHR	F	-1.04%
THO	F	-1.02%
CUZ	A	-0.99%
FLR	C	-0.98%
FNB	A	-0.97%
KRC	D	-0.92%
HOG	D	-0.9%
VAC	C	-0.9%
FYBR	C	-0.89%
POST	C	-0.87%
ZION	A	-0.87%
AR	A	-0.85%
UGI	C	-0.84%
CHK	B	-0.81%
ENOV	F	-0.81%
FHN	A	-0.8%
PENN	F	-0.74%
VLY	D	-0.73%
ONB	A	-0.72%
GPS	D	-0.69%
COHR	D	-0.68%
SWX	A	-0.67%
PB	B	-0.67%
TGNA	D	-0.67%
JHG	B	-0.67%
GEF	D	-0.66%
OSK	D	-0.65%
TCBI	B	-0.63%
IRT	B	-0.62%
AGCO	F	-0.62%
BJ	C	-0.59%
NVST	F	-0.58%
BKH	B	-0.55%
NOV	D	-0.54%
WBS	D	-0.54%
CNO	A	-0.54%
VSH	C	-0.54%
ORI	A	-0.53%
SR	B	-0.47%
FAF	F	-0.46%
WERN	D	-0.46%
BERY	D	-0.45%
KNX	F	-0.43%
LEG	F	-0.35%
CNXC	F	-0.34%
NYCB	D	-0.34%
UA	D	-0.32%
UAA	F	-0.32%