EATZ vs. XMVM ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM)
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.07

Average Daily Volume

1,604

Number of Holdings *

24

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

XMVM Description The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to track the performance of approximately 80 stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® that have the highest “value” and “momentum” scores.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.56

Average Daily Volume

22,976

Number of Holdings *

78

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EATZ XMVM
30 Days 2.21% -1.72%
60 Days -1.36% 1.97%
90 Days 6.83% 7.78%
12 Months 17.51% 28.06%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EATZ Weight in XMVM Overlap
ARMK B 3.55% 1.31% 1.31%
USFD C 2.67% 1.41% 1.41%
EATZ Overweight 22 Positions Relative to XMVM
Symbol Grade Weight
WING A 5.82%
CMG A 5.53%
DPZ B 5.29%
EAT A 5.07%
ARCO C 4.83%
DIN F 4.76%
YUM C 4.68%
PTLO F 4.43%
CASY A 4.16%
BROS D 4.08%
DRI F 3.67%
MCD F 3.66%
CHUY F 3.52%
TXRH A 3.37%
SHAK B 3.26%
BLMN F 2.9%
LOCO C 2.68%
SBUX F 2.65%
PLAY D 2.51%
JACK F 2.21%
PBPB F 1.48%
BJRI C 1.46%
EATZ Underweight 76 Positions Relative to XMVM
Symbol Grade Weight
PBF D -3.34%
AVT B -2.54%
DINO F -2.29%
ARW B -2.27%
AN B -2.27%
SNX A -2.2%
TMHC C -2.03%
CNX B -1.95%
LAD D -1.92%
UNM B -1.9%
SWN B -1.87%
X D -1.87%
KBH C -1.75%
CMC C -1.74%
TOL B -1.74%
THC A -1.69%
VST A -1.6%
MDU A -1.58%
AMG D -1.56%
R A -1.52%
PFGC D -1.47%
RGA A -1.45%
ADNT F -1.43%
PAG D -1.38%
MTG C -1.37%
PPC A -1.32%
TCBI B -1.3%
JEF B -1.28%
CHRD B -1.28%
CIVI B -1.27%
GT D -1.26%
TEX D -1.26%
CLF F -1.24%
ESNT C -1.2%
JHG A -1.19%
LEA F -1.19%
AGCO D -1.17%
RNR D -1.16%
PR B -1.15%
THO F -1.14%
RRC B -1.14%
OSK D -1.11%
MUR B -1.1%
ORI A -1.09%
VSH C -1.08%
SF A -1.06%
VVV C -1.05%
KEX B -1.05%
GEF D -1.03%
PVH D -1.01%
INGR C -0.98%
MUSA D -0.97%
WLK B -0.96%
FLR C -0.96%
MTDR D -0.95%
BDC C -0.94%
OC A -0.93%
ALE B -0.93%
TKR B -0.92%
RS D -0.87%
NWE B -0.85%
KD D -0.83%
AMKR C -0.82%
BERY D -0.82%
UFPI C -0.79%
BC F -0.79%
WERN D -0.76%
VOYA C -0.76%
ENS B -0.75%
CNO A -0.73%
SAIC C -0.72%
CRI D -0.71%
FAF D -0.7%
KNX F -0.69%
HELE F -0.62%
NYCB D -0.61%
Compare ETFs