EATZ vs. RFV ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$23.71
Average Daily Volume
1,619
24
RFV
Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF
RFV Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$114.14
Average Daily Volume
19,426
88
Performance
| Period | EATZ | RFV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.39% | -4.10% |
| 60 Days | -2.03% | 0.15% |
| 90 Days | 3.29% | 1.01% |
| 12 Months | 16.37% | 27.27% |
EATZ Overweight 22 Positions Relative to RFV
EATZ Underweight 86 Positions Relative to RFV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | C | -3.56% | |
| M | C | -2.64% | |
| SNX | A | -2.62% | |
| AVT | A | -2.61% | |
| ARW | B | -2.27% | |
| DINO | F | -2.24% | |
| X | F | -2.14% | |
| LAD | F | -1.99% | |
| GT | D | -1.98% | |
| AN | B | -1.89% | |
| MAN | B | -1.83% | |
| MTZ | B | -1.8% | |
| JWN | B | -1.79% | |
| ADNT | F | -1.78% | |
| AA | A | -1.74% | |
| JLL | C | -1.69% | |
| PFGC | D | -1.59% | |
| CLF | F | -1.55% | |
| GHC | B | -1.54% | |
| UNM | A | -1.52% | |
| TMHC | C | -1.52% | |
| PPC | A | -1.5% | |
| THC | A | -1.46% | |
| ALLY | A | -1.43% | |
| WCC | C | -1.42% | |
| R | A | -1.38% | |
| LEA | F | -1.36% | |
| MDU | A | -1.34% | |
| HTZ | F | -1.26% | |
| ASB | A | -1.22% | |
| PVH | D | -1.19% | |
| PAG | D | -1.18% | |
| KMPR | B | -1.18% | |
| CMC | C | -1.13% | |
| RGA | A | -1.12% | |
| PRGO | B | -1.09% | |
| JEF | B | -1.08% | |
| KD | D | -1.06% | |
| WHR | F | -1.04% | |
| THO | F | -1.02% | |
| CUZ | A | -0.99% | |
| FLR | C | -0.98% | |
| FNB | A | -0.97% | |
| KRC | D | -0.92% | |
| HOG | D | -0.9% | |
| VAC | C | -0.9% | |
| FYBR | C | -0.89% | |
| POST | C | -0.87% | |
| ZION | A | -0.87% | |
| AR | A | -0.85% | |
| UGI | C | -0.84% | |
| CHK | B | -0.81% | |
| ENOV | F | -0.81% | |
| FHN | A | -0.8% | |
| PENN | F | -0.74% | |
| VLY | D | -0.73% | |
| ONB | A | -0.72% | |
| GPS | D | -0.69% | |
| COHR | D | -0.68% | |
| SWX | A | -0.67% | |
| PB | B | -0.67% | |
| TGNA | D | -0.67% | |
| JHG | B | -0.67% | |
| GEF | D | -0.66% | |
| OSK | D | -0.65% | |
| TCBI | B | -0.63% | |
| IRT | B | -0.62% | |
| AGCO | F | -0.62% | |
| BJ | C | -0.59% | |
| NVST | F | -0.58% | |
| BKH | B | -0.55% | |
| NOV | D | -0.54% | |
| WBS | D | -0.54% | |
| CNO | A | -0.54% | |
| VSH | C | -0.54% | |
| ORI | A | -0.53% | |
| SR | B | -0.47% | |
| FAF | F | -0.46% | |
| WERN | D | -0.46% | |
| BERY | D | -0.45% | |
| KNX | F | -0.43% | |
| LEG | F | -0.35% | |
| CNXC | F | -0.34% | |
| NYCB | D | -0.34% | |
| UA | D | -0.32% | |
| UAA | F | -0.32% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RFV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
