EATZ vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.56

Average Daily Volume

1,965

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$124.24

Average Daily Volume

5,971

Number of Holdings *

82

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EATZ RFV
30 Days 4.13% 2.06%
60 Days 8.26% 6.09%
90 Days 12.34% 8.23%
12 Months 38.89% 21.36%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EATZ Weight in RFV Overlap
ARMK C 4.67% 1.48% 1.48%
PFGC B 4.56% 1.86% 1.86%
USFD A 4.77% 2.07% 2.07%
EATZ Overweight 18 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT A 7.2%
TXRH B 6.48%
BROS A 6.28%
CAKE B 5.82%
WING D 5.36%
YUMC B 5.22%
LOCO D 4.8%
DIN C 4.64%
CASY A 4.45%
DPZ C 4.35%
SYY D 4.33%
DRI C 4.17%
SGBX F 3.94%
STKS F 3.87%
CMG C 2.42%
YUM D 1.63%
MCD D 1.45%
SHAK C 1.44%
EATZ Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
LAD B -2.66%
AVT C -2.59%
MTZ A -2.59%
SNX D -2.39%
JLL D -2.27%
THC C -2.24%
M D -2.07%
UNM A -2.02%
JWN C -1.98%
X C -1.97%
PPC B -1.96%
AAL B -1.92%
GHC B -1.9%
ARW F -1.9%
PBF D -1.79%
AN D -1.79%
AA A -1.78%
WCC B -1.75%
R B -1.74%
TMHC B -1.74%
JEF A -1.7%
DINO D -1.54%
GT C -1.43%
MAN F -1.42%
KD A -1.42%
ASB B -1.41%
KMPR A -1.33%
RGA B -1.27%
ALLY C -1.24%
FYBR C -1.23%
CUZ B -1.22%
ZION B -1.18%
CMC B -1.15%
WHR B -1.15%
PAG B -1.15%
FLR B -1.14%
COHR B -1.13%
FNB B -1.11%
FHN A -1.03%
PVH C -1.03%
THO C -1.02%
KRC C -0.99%
VLY B -0.98%
JHG B -0.92%
CLF F -0.92%
TCBI B -0.91%
ONB B -0.89%
LEA F -0.89%
PRGO C -0.84%
POST C -0.82%
PB A -0.82%
VAC C -0.8%
HOG F -0.78%
CNH C -0.78%
IRT A -0.76%
CNO B -0.74%
AR B -0.71%
UGI C -0.71%
GEF B -0.68%
GAP D -0.67%
WBS A -0.67%
SWX A -0.64%
BJ B -0.63%
ENOV C -0.62%
ORI A -0.62%
BIO C -0.59%
BKH A -0.59%
OSK C -0.58%
NVST C -0.53%
FAF C -0.52%
KNX B -0.48%
BERY D -0.48%
SR A -0.47%
AGCO F -0.45%
UAA C -0.44%
NOV D -0.42%
UA C -0.41%
VSH F -0.35%
CNXC F -0.23%
Compare ETFs