XMHQ vs. NEWZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ)
XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.44

Average Daily Volume

296,198

Number of Holdings *

76

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NEWZ

StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF

NEWZ Description NEWZ navigates market complexities through a proprietary news media sentiment signal which combines AI and NLP technologies. This signal is generated from textual sources, such as news articles, blogs, and SEC filings, processed using advanced machine learning algorithms. These algorithms sift through vast amounts of data to assess investor sentiment and identify stocks with the most positive news coverage. The process begins by screening US-listed equity securities based on capitalization, volatility, ROE, news coverage volume, and inclusion in Zacks sector and industry classifications. Selections are made based on the sentiment signal, which also integrates a sentiment momentum signal indicating shifts in investor sentiment over time. After the screening, the portfolio typically comprises the top 30 to 50 stocks, all equally weighted. Throughout this process, the fund prioritizes reliability, gathering information from reputable news outlets such as Zacks, Motley Fool, and CNBC. The fund is rebalanced and reconstituted monthly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.82

Average Daily Volume

2,432

Number of Holdings *

30

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XMHQ NEWZ
30 Days 1.86% 4.01%
60 Days 6.58% 8.43%
90 Days 8.75% 11.92%
12 Months 33.21%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XMHQ Weight in NEWZ Overlap
KNSL C 1.69% 2.6% 1.69%
MANH C 4.03% 3.95% 3.95%
XMHQ Overweight 74 Positions Relative to NEWZ
Symbol Grade Weight
CSL C 3.8%
EME B 3.78%
WSM F 3.34%
RS B 2.46%
RNR D 2.43%
FIX B 2.42%
THC B 2.32%
LECO B 2.15%
OC B 2.01%
GGG B 2.0%
PSTG D 1.98%
TOL B 1.96%
CW B 1.88%
DT C 1.71%
MEDP D 1.7%
WMS F 1.65%
BLD F 1.6%
DKS D 1.51%
EXP B 1.46%
CR B 1.42%
CVLT B 1.37%
AYI A 1.37%
MUSA B 1.36%
AIT A 1.36%
RGLD C 1.32%
CNM D 1.32%
INGR B 1.31%
TREX C 1.31%
PRI A 1.3%
PCTY A 1.25%
CHE D 1.25%
CELH F 1.24%
SEIC A 1.23%
UFPI B 1.22%
AFG B 1.2%
SAIC B 1.2%
LSCC C 1.15%
LSTR B 1.13%
DCI A 1.1%
LNTH F 1.04%
CROX F 1.03%
RLI A 1.03%
SSD D 1.01%
WFRD D 1.01%
QLYS C 0.98%
VNT B 0.91%
ROIV D 0.9%
CHX D 0.88%
COKE D 0.87%
CBT B 0.86%
KBH D 0.85%
DINO D 0.85%
MSA D 0.83%
G B 0.83%
MTG D 0.8%
VVV B 0.79%
EXPO D 0.77%
ELF C 0.77%
ESNT D 0.74%
MSM B 0.68%
CRUS F 0.67%
NEU C 0.61%
LOPE B 0.61%
LANC B 0.56%
TEX C 0.52%
ENS D 0.51%
NSP F 0.51%
FHI A 0.5%
IBOC B 0.49%
SAM B 0.44%
YETI C 0.44%
VC D 0.39%
CXT D 0.36%
CRI F 0.31%
XMHQ Underweight 28 Positions Relative to NEWZ
Symbol Grade Weight
NOW A -4.25%
TT A -4.17%
PEGA A -4.0%
ANET C -3.98%
TAC C -3.84%
MSI B -3.76%
VOYA A -3.73%
NTAP C -3.6%
APH B -3.54%
UTHR B -3.53%
PAYX B -3.48%
BR A -3.38%
FTNT A -3.38%
STX D -3.27%
EBAY D -3.25%
ZTS F -3.23%
AIZ A -3.21%
DGX A -3.18%
TMUS A -3.1%
UL D -3.0%
ORCL A -2.9%
SHOP B -2.89%
BRO A -2.86%
ANF D -2.83%
CL F -2.79%
PGR B -2.75%
BMI B -2.67%
DVA C -2.53%
Compare ETFs