RSPS vs. NBSM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
RSPS Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Consumer Staples Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the consumer staples sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.96
Average Daily Volume
58,950
37
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
NBSM Description
NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.95
Average Daily Volume
10,788
44
Performance
Period | RSPS | NBSM |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -3.06% | -1.94% |
60 Days | -3.04% | -0.96% |
90 Days | -1.25% | 2.29% |
12 Months | 7.52% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in RSPS | Weight in NBSM | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD | B | 2.65% | 1.47% | 1.47% |
RSPS Overweight 36 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
LW | B | 3.24% | |
PM | A | 2.84% | |
MNST | C | 2.83% | |
EL | F | 2.82% | |
WMT | A | 2.77% | |
TAP | D | 2.75% | |
KR | A | 2.73% | |
WBA | C | 2.73% | |
K | A | 2.7% | |
TGT | D | 2.67% | |
KHC | D | 2.65% | |
KVUE | B | 2.64% | |
PG | D | 2.62% | |
COST | D | 2.62% | |
HRL | F | 2.61% | |
SJM | F | 2.61% | |
PEP | D | 2.61% | |
SYY | D | 2.61% | |
TSN | D | 2.59% | |
DLTR | F | 2.58% | |
DG | F | 2.58% | |
KMB | D | 2.57% | |
CLX | B | 2.57% | |
STZ | F | 2.56% | |
MO | A | 2.54% | |
CL | F | 2.54% | |
MKC | C | 2.53% | |
KO | D | 2.53% | |
ADM | F | 2.52% | |
KDP | F | 2.5% | |
MDLZ | D | 2.5% | |
GIS | D | 2.5% | |
BG | F | 2.49% | |
CPB | D | 2.47% | |
CAG | D | 2.46% | |
HSY | F | 2.44% |
RSPS Underweight 43 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
FICO | B | -3.85% | |
EXP | B | -3.8% | |
KEX | D | -3.4% | |
TTEK | B | -3.08% | |
ITT | C | -3.02% | |
WSO | D | -3.01% | |
VMI | A | -3.0% | |
RYAN | C | -3.0% | |
ATR | A | -2.97% | |
TYL | A | -2.82% | |
RBC | D | -2.74% | |
CNX | B | -2.49% | |
CHE | F | -2.43% | |
HAE | F | -2.39% | |
TTC | F | -2.19% | |
RLI | B | -2.18% | |
CBU | A | -2.07% | |
LFUS | D | -2.05% | |
ENTG | D | -2.04% | |
MKSI | F | -2.0% | |
CR | B | -1.99% | |
NXST | A | -1.97% | |
TXRH | A | -1.96% | |
GGG | D | -1.96% | |
LECO | B | -1.94% | |
TECH | B | -1.93% | |
TDW | F | -1.88% | |
LSCC | C | -1.86% | |
CFR | B | -1.78% | |
POWI | C | -1.62% | |
BSY | F | -1.62% | |
TSCO | D | -1.6% | |
BFAM | C | -1.5% | |
PB | B | -1.49% | |
SPSC | F | -1.46% | |
ROL | D | -1.44% | |
SSD | F | -1.42% | |
ICLR | F | -1.41% | |
IBP | F | -1.26% | |
MANH | D | -1.15% | |
FND | D | -1.15% | |
CNM | D | -1.1% | |
LNT | C | -1.0% |
RSPS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
NBSM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords