RPV vs. XLF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to SPDR Select Sector Fund - Financial (XLF)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.06

Average Daily Volume

142,714

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XLF

SPDR Select Sector Fund - Financial

XLF Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before expenses, correspond to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in The Financial Select Sector Index. In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies from the following industries: diversified financial services; insurance; commercial banks; capital markets; REITs; consumer finance; thrifts & mortgage finance; and real estate management & development. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.17

Average Daily Volume

39,045,484

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	XLF
30 Days	6.02%	6.41%
60 Days	7.94%	10.28%
90 Days	8.21%	13.33%
12 Months	30.05%	44.57%

31 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in XLF	Overlap
AIG	B	0.92%	0.71%	0.71%
AIZ	A	0.66%	0.16%	0.16%
ALL	A	0.57%	0.75%	0.57%
BAC	A	1.1%	4.5%	1.1%
BEN	C	0.6%	0.1%	0.1%
BK	A	1.05%	0.83%	0.83%
BRK.A	B	3.71%	12.45%	3.71%
C	A	2.17%	1.89%	1.89%
CFG	B	2.12%	0.3%	0.3%
CINF	A	0.61%	0.34%	0.34%
COF	C	1.5%	1.02%	1.02%
EG	C	0.49%	0.23%	0.23%
FITB	B	0.69%	0.46%	0.46%
GS	A	0.86%	2.7%	0.86%
HBAN	A	0.99%	0.37%	0.37%
HIG	B	0.74%	0.5%	0.5%
IVZ	B	1.82%	0.12%	0.12%
KEY	B	0.93%	0.26%	0.26%
L	A	1.02%	0.22%	0.22%
MET	A	0.69%	0.71%	0.69%
MTB	A	1.31%	0.52%	0.52%
PFG	D	0.49%	0.27%	0.27%
PNC	B	0.69%	1.2%	0.69%
PRU	A	1.04%	0.65%	0.65%
RF	A	0.95%	0.35%	0.35%
STT	B	0.89%	0.41%	0.41%
SYF	B	1.48%	0.37%	0.37%
TFC	A	1.36%	0.9%	0.9%
TRV	B	0.55%	0.85%	0.55%
USB	A	0.56%	1.14%	0.56%
WFC	A	1.15%	3.6%	1.15%

RPV Overweight 62 Positions Relative to XLF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	C	4.89%
UAL	A	4.0%
MHK	D	2.32%
VTRS	A	2.29%
F	C	2.25%
TSN	B	2.22%
KR	B	1.89%
PARA	C	1.84%
VLO	C	1.75%
KMX	B	1.51%
BG	D	1.5%
MCK	A	1.5%
IP	A	1.47%
SW	A	1.46%
CVS	D	1.45%
WBD	B	1.45%
HPE	B	1.42%
PSX	C	1.39%
NRG	B	1.39%
COR	B	1.35%
CNC	D	1.3%
CI	D	1.26%
CAH	B	1.24%
BWA	D	1.21%
BBY	D	1.18%
UHS	D	1.12%
LUV	C	1.07%
T	A	0.88%
ADM	D	0.84%
TAP	C	0.82%
WBA	F	0.8%
KHC	F	0.79%
MOS	F	0.77%
IFF	D	0.64%
KMI	A	0.63%
FOXA	A	0.61%
EQT	B	0.6%
EVRG	A	0.58%
VZ	C	0.55%
CHRW	B	0.55%
PNW	A	0.55%
TGT	F	0.53%
SWK	D	0.52%
FDX	B	0.52%
CTVA	C	0.51%
EMN	C	0.51%
HPQ	B	0.5%
SYY	D	0.48%
CAG	F	0.48%
ES	C	0.47%
CVX	A	0.46%
DOW	F	0.45%
HSIC	C	0.43%
NWSA	A	0.42%
ARE	F	0.42%
LYB	F	0.41%
ELV	F	0.41%
ALB	B	0.38%
LKQ	F	0.37%
FOX	A	0.31%
HUM	C	0.26%
NWS	A	0.14%

RPV Underweight 41 Positions Relative to XLF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	A	-10.0%
V	A	-7.49%
MA	B	-6.24%
MS	A	-2.4%
SPGI	C	-2.38%
AXP	A	-2.36%
PGR	A	-2.19%
BLK	B	-2.12%
BX	A	-1.9%
FI	A	-1.76%
SCHW	B	-1.74%
MMC	B	-1.58%
CB	C	-1.57%
KKR	A	-1.48%
ICE	C	-1.31%
PYPL	B	-1.27%
AON	A	-1.19%
CME	B	-1.17%
MCO	B	-1.1%
AJG	A	-0.94%
AMP	A	-0.8%
AFL	B	-0.8%
FIS	C	-0.7%
MSCI	C	-0.69%
DFS	B	-0.63%
ACGL	C	-0.54%
NDAQ	A	-0.47%
WTW	B	-0.46%
GPN	B	-0.43%
RJF	A	-0.43%
TROW	B	-0.39%
BRO	B	-0.38%
CPAY	A	-0.37%
NTRS	A	-0.31%
CBOE	C	-0.3%
FDS	B	-0.27%
WRB	A	-0.26%
JKHY	D	-0.18%
MKTX	D	-0.15%
ERIE	D	-0.15%
GL	C	-0.14%