RFV vs. TINY ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY)
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$114.35

Average Daily Volume

18,890

Number of Holdings *

88

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
TINY

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

TINY Description TINY is a passively managed fund that invests in securities from developed countries perceived to help businesses use nanotechnology to transform lives and revolutionize different industries. Companies considered should be involved in the production, application, development, or promotion of nanotechnologies. Using natural language processing algorithm, filings and public information are scanned to identify companies that have or are expected to have significant exposure to nanotechnology. Companies are then scored and ranked based on their level of exposure. Only the 30 highest-ranking companies are selected. Securities are weighted by market cap with a maximum limit of 4.5%. The index is reconstituted and rebalanced semi-annually in May and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.13

Average Daily Volume

2,182

Number of Holdings *

17

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RFV TINY
30 Days -1.54% -2.17%
60 Days 0.37% -6.89%
90 Days 3.66% 10.83%
12 Months 25.48% 44.87%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RFV Weight in TINY Overlap
RFV Overweight 88 Positions Relative to TINY
Symbol Grade Weight
PBF D 3.56%
M C 2.64%
SNX A 2.62%
AVT B 2.61%
ARW B 2.27%
DINO F 2.24%
X D 2.14%
LAD D 1.99%
GT D 1.98%
AN B 1.89%
MAN B 1.83%
MTZ B 1.8%
JWN B 1.79%
ADNT F 1.78%
AA B 1.74%
USFD C 1.72%
JLL C 1.69%
PFGC D 1.59%
CLF F 1.55%
GHC C 1.54%
UNM B 1.52%
TMHC C 1.52%
PPC A 1.5%
THC A 1.46%
ALLY B 1.43%
WCC C 1.42%
R A 1.38%
LEA F 1.36%
MDU A 1.34%
ARMK B 1.32%
HTZ F 1.26%
ASB A 1.22%
PVH D 1.19%
PAG D 1.18%
KMPR B 1.18%
CMC C 1.13%
RGA A 1.12%
PRGO B 1.09%
JEF B 1.08%
KD D 1.06%
WHR F 1.04%
THO F 1.02%
CUZ B 0.99%
FLR C 0.98%
FNB A 0.97%
KRC D 0.92%
HOG D 0.9%
VAC C 0.9%
FYBR B 0.89%
POST B 0.87%
ZION B 0.87%
AR A 0.85%
UGI C 0.84%
CHK B 0.81%
ENOV F 0.81%
FHN A 0.8%
PENN F 0.74%
VLY F 0.73%
ONB A 0.72%
GPS D 0.69%
COHR D 0.68%
SWX A 0.67%
PB B 0.67%
TGNA D 0.67%
JHG A 0.67%
GEF D 0.66%
OSK D 0.65%
TCBI B 0.63%
IRT B 0.62%
AGCO D 0.62%
BJ B 0.59%
NVST F 0.58%
BKH B 0.55%
NOV C 0.54%
WBS D 0.54%
CNO A 0.54%
VSH C 0.54%
ORI A 0.53%
SR B 0.47%
FAF D 0.46%
WERN D 0.46%
BERY D 0.45%
KNX F 0.43%
LEG F 0.35%
CNXC F 0.34%
NYCB D 0.34%
UA D 0.32%
UAA F 0.32%
RFV Underweight 17 Positions Relative to TINY
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C -6.56%
ONTO A -5.17%
LRCX D -4.75%
AMAT C -4.71%
KLAC A -4.64%
TSM C -4.62%
ENTG D -4.5%
BRKR D -4.4%
A D -4.31%
VECO A -3.19%
UCTT D -2.96%
INTC F -2.73%
ACLS D -2.35%
ACMR D -2.25%
LASR C -0.86%
NVAX D -0.72%
LWLG D -0.72%
Compare ETFs