RFV vs. GRPM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF (GRPM)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$118.27

Average Daily Volume

5,947

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF

GRPM Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the top 60 growth stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® Index with relatively high quality and value composite scores, which are computed pursuant to the index methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$114.65

Average Daily Volume

30,243

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	GRPM
30 Days	1.36%	-0.93%
60 Days	0.88%	-2.44%
90 Days	5.81%	1.43%
12 Months	24.34%	33.39%

12 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in GRPM	Overlap
AGCO	C	0.51%	1.17%	0.51%
AN	F	1.84%	2.17%	1.84%
ARW	D	2.32%	1.14%	1.14%
AVT	B	2.78%	1.98%	1.98%
CMC	A	1.05%	1.31%	1.05%
DINO	F	1.63%	1.7%	1.63%
HOG	F	0.79%	1.92%	0.79%
LAD	A	2.52%	1.91%	1.91%
PAG	F	1.15%	1.31%	1.15%
PBF	F	1.92%	1.43%	1.43%
PVH	C	0.97%	0.91%	0.91%
TMHC	A	1.77%	1.39%	1.39%

RFV Overweight 70 Positions Relative to GRPM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SNX	C	2.62%
JLL	B	2.49%
MTZ	A	2.43%
X	C	2.25%
THC	C	2.19%
M	D	2.16%
JWN	C	2.04%
USFD	B	2.0%
AA	B	1.91%
PPC	A	1.9%
PFGC	B	1.87%
UNM	A	1.86%
AAL	A	1.8%
GHC	A	1.64%
JEF	B	1.57%
WCC	A	1.57%
ARMK	B	1.53%
R	A	1.53%
MAN	F	1.5%
GT	F	1.38%
FYBR	A	1.34%
CUZ	B	1.31%
KMPR	B	1.27%
KD	D	1.27%
ASB	A	1.26%
ALLY	F	1.24%
RGA	C	1.23%
FLR	B	1.23%
WHR	B	1.17%
COHR	B	1.15%
CLF	C	1.12%
KRC	B	1.1%
ZION	B	1.09%
FNB	A	1.02%
THO	D	1.02%
VLY	A	0.97%
LEA	F	0.96%
FHN	B	0.93%
POST	D	0.89%
CNH	A	0.86%
TCBI	B	0.84%
JHG	A	0.83%
PRGO	D	0.82%
ONB	A	0.81%
UGI	D	0.79%
PB	B	0.77%
IRT	D	0.76%
CNO	A	0.69%
VAC	B	0.69%
AR	F	0.68%
GAP	D	0.68%
GEF	B	0.66%
BJ	A	0.65%
SWX	C	0.65%
ORI	D	0.61%
WBS	B	0.61%
BKH	D	0.6%
BIO	A	0.58%
OSK	C	0.57%
ENOV	C	0.57%
NVST	A	0.53%
FAF	D	0.53%
BERY	A	0.52%
SR	D	0.49%
KNX	A	0.46%
NOV	F	0.42%
VSH	F	0.41%
UAA	B	0.4%
UA	B	0.38%
CNXC	F	0.28%

RFV Underweight 48 Positions Relative to GRPM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LNTH	C	-4.12%
ROIV	D	-2.99%
KNSL	F	-2.47%
HWC	A	-2.38%
AAON	A	-2.38%
BYD	A	-2.21%
TXRH	A	-2.2%
CNX	B	-2.13%
MTDR	D	-2.01%
MUSA	C	-2.01%
AIT	A	-2.0%
CROX	F	-1.98%
TEX	F	-1.97%
CHRD	F	-1.95%
RNR	C	-1.83%
EME	A	-1.81%
FIX	B	-1.8%
CIVI	F	-1.76%
OZK	B	-1.75%
EWBC	A	-1.75%
TOL	C	-1.71%
RS	C	-1.6%
CELH	F	-1.58%
VAL	F	-1.56%
OC	B	-1.55%
DAR	B	-1.52%
RMBS	C	-1.49%
MEDP	F	-1.47%
KBH	D	-1.43%
EXP	B	-1.43%
CVLT	B	-1.43%
IBOC	B	-1.42%
NFG	C	-1.42%
VC	F	-1.4%
CBT	B	-1.39%
SSD	F	-1.39%
MANH	D	-1.38%
BLD	F	-1.38%
LSCC	C	-1.38%
AMG	A	-1.35%
LECO	B	-1.3%
OVV	F	-1.21%
PII	F	-1.17%
LOPE	D	-1.13%
MUR	F	-1.09%
SAIA	A	-1.04%
QLYS	F	-0.97%
RRC	D	-0.96%