RFV vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$126.73

Average Daily Volume

5,883

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description

CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.81

Average Daily Volume

7,195

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	CPAI
30 Days	6.42%	5.48%
60 Days	8.22%	9.78%
90 Days	8.16%	11.01%
12 Months	24.43%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in CPAI	Overlap
CNO	B	0.74%	2.15%	0.74%
THC	D	2.24%	1.88%	1.88%
UNM	A	2.02%	2.25%	2.02%

RFV Overweight 79 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	2.66%
AVT	C	2.59%
MTZ	B	2.59%
SNX	D	2.39%
JLL	D	2.27%
USFD	A	2.07%
M	F	2.07%
JWN	D	1.98%
X	B	1.97%
PPC	C	1.96%
AAL	B	1.92%
GHC	B	1.9%
ARW	D	1.9%
PFGC	B	1.86%
PBF	D	1.79%
AN	C	1.79%
AA	A	1.78%
WCC	B	1.75%
R	B	1.74%
TMHC	C	1.74%
JEF	A	1.7%
DINO	D	1.54%
ARMK	B	1.48%
GT	C	1.43%
MAN	F	1.42%
KD	B	1.42%
ASB	B	1.41%
KMPR	A	1.33%
RGA	A	1.27%
ALLY	C	1.24%
FYBR	C	1.23%
CUZ	B	1.22%
ZION	B	1.18%
CMC	B	1.15%
WHR	B	1.15%
PAG	B	1.15%
FLR	B	1.14%
COHR	B	1.13%
FNB	A	1.11%
FHN	A	1.03%
PVH	C	1.03%
THO	B	1.02%
KRC	B	0.99%
VLY	B	0.98%
JHG	B	0.92%
CLF	F	0.92%
TCBI	C	0.91%
ONB	C	0.89%
LEA	F	0.89%
PRGO	C	0.84%
POST	C	0.82%
PB	B	0.82%
VAC	C	0.8%
HOG	D	0.78%
CNH	C	0.78%
IRT	A	0.76%
AR	B	0.71%
UGI	C	0.71%
GEF	A	0.68%
GAP	C	0.67%
WBS	A	0.67%
SWX	B	0.64%
BJ	A	0.63%
ENOV	C	0.62%
ORI	A	0.62%
BIO	C	0.59%
BKH	A	0.59%
OSK	C	0.58%
NVST	B	0.53%
FAF	A	0.52%
KNX	C	0.48%
BERY	C	0.48%
SR	A	0.47%
AGCO	D	0.45%
UAA	C	0.44%
NOV	C	0.42%
UA	C	0.41%
VSH	F	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.23%

RFV Underweight 46 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SFM	A	-2.51%
SKYW	C	-2.49%
TRGP	A	-2.46%
TDS	B	-2.43%
CARG	B	-2.37%
LDOS	C	-2.33%
NTGR	B	-2.27%
GDDY	A	-2.23%
OKE	A	-2.21%
FTDR	B	-2.17%
BRBR	A	-2.17%
EQH	C	-2.16%
HTZ	C	-2.13%
FTI	A	-2.13%
ACIW	B	-2.11%
VIRT	A	-2.11%
ORCL	A	-2.09%
CVLT	B	-2.08%
CAH	B	-2.08%
MSI	B	-2.07%
CLBT	B	-2.06%
COR	B	-2.05%
GOOGL	C	-2.05%
GNW	A	-2.03%
PBI	B	-2.01%
PGR	A	-1.93%
META	D	-1.93%
RTX	D	-1.9%
BRC	D	-1.89%
TJX	A	-1.89%
LESL	D	-1.87%
NYT	D	-1.85%
ZIM	C	-1.84%
MSFT	D	-1.83%
WBA	F	-1.82%
AAPL	C	-1.81%
PAA	B	-1.8%
PAGP	A	-1.79%
WES	C	-1.76%
LLY	F	-1.74%
MHO	D	-1.72%
PRM	C	-1.72%
ROST	D	-1.72%
UHS	D	-1.64%
HCA	F	-1.61%
AGL	F	-0.95%