NSCS vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF (NSCS) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)

NSCS

Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF

NSCS Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of the sum of its net assets and the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in exchange-traded common stocks of small-capitalization companies. It may invest up to 15% of its total assets in non-dollar denominated equity securities of non-U.S. issuers listed on a foreign exchange that trade on such exchange contemporaneously with the shares of the fund. Up to 15% of the fund's total assets may be invested in equity securities of emerging market issuers.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.82

Average Daily Volume

1,271

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.18

Average Daily Volume

28,987

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NSCS	RFG
30 Days	1.52%	1.98%
60 Days	0.67%	-0.19%
90 Days	7.47%	0.95%
12 Months	27.08%	25.18%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in NSCS	Weight in RFG	Overlap
AIT	B	1.53%	0.94%	0.94%
BYD	C	1.16%	0.52%	0.52%
HALO	D	0.71%	0.72%	0.71%
MTDR	F	1.25%	0.77%	0.77%
ONTO	C	1.14%	1.42%	1.14%
PRI	B	0.85%	0.93%	0.85%

NSCS Overweight 68 Positions Relative to RFG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EVR	B	2.41%
WTFC	C	2.25%
PIPR	B	2.19%
QTWO	C	2.04%
SSB	C	1.91%
NOG	F	1.83%
PRMW	C	1.81%
BANR	C	1.67%
MMSI	C	1.64%
ESE	B	1.58%
ACA	B	1.55%
FIBK	C	1.52%
HQY	C	1.51%
TPH	C	1.51%
EGP	C	1.5%
FLR	D	1.48%
STAG	D	1.48%
MGNI	D	1.48%
EHC	B	1.43%
AVNT	B	1.43%
KTOS	B	1.42%
SHAK	C	1.4%
SUM	D	1.39%
AVAV	C	1.38%
HOMB	D	1.37%
MMS	B	1.36%
SHOO	B	1.36%
EVRI	B	1.33%
WK	D	1.32%
ASGN	D	1.32%
SIG	C	1.31%
BKH	B	1.31%
CMC	D	1.3%
NPO	C	1.28%
ARCB	D	1.23%
GDYN	C	1.2%
OPCH	C	1.19%
LITE	B	1.18%
TROX	D	1.16%
RDNT	B	1.15%
CVLT	B	1.14%
PFBC	D	1.13%
LADR	D	1.05%
GKOS	C	1.05%
BRBR	B	1.01%
SLAB	D	0.99%
ICHR	D	0.96%
SEM	D	0.94%
SR	B	0.93%
RBRK	F	0.92%
ZD	D	0.91%
ENV	C	0.89%
KEX	C	0.88%
DAN	D	0.82%
TTMI	D	0.79%
FROG	F	0.76%
INN	B	0.75%
INSM	D	0.73%
KRYS	D	0.73%
SIBN	F	0.72%
CRNX	D	0.72%
PCVX	C	0.71%
ESTA	D	0.68%
ARHS	F	0.66%
MDGL	F	0.53%
IMVT	F	0.48%
TCMD	C	0.46%
BPMC	F	0.33%

NSCS Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	B	-2.91%
DUOL	C	-2.77%
FIX	B	-2.38%
TOL	A	-2.19%
RYAN	C	-2.04%
SWN	C	-2.04%
WING	C	-2.02%
BLD	C	-2.01%
AAON	B	-2.0%
LNTH	D	-1.87%
EME	B	-1.81%
MUSA	D	-1.73%
MEDP	F	-1.7%
APPF	C	-1.7%
H	B	-1.64%
WFRD	F	-1.62%
PR	F	-1.61%
CLH	C	-1.58%
KNSL	D	-1.58%
OC	C	-1.53%
EXP	B	-1.52%
SSD	C	-1.36%
PK	D	-1.34%
ELF	F	-1.32%
DT	C	-1.31%
ANF	D	-1.24%
CHDN	D	-1.24%
LII	C	-1.19%
RS	D	-1.17%
RRC	D	-1.16%
TXRH	B	-1.16%
VVV	D	-1.16%
WSM	C	-1.12%
COKE	C	-1.12%
UFPI	C	-1.12%
NVT	C	-1.11%
FND	C	-1.1%
CROX	C	-1.09%
MANH	B	-1.08%
VAL	F	-1.08%
CELH	F	-1.06%
OVV	F	-1.06%
CASY	D	-1.03%
OLED	D	-1.02%
SAIA	D	-1.02%
TPX	B	-1.01%
CHRD	F	-1.01%
EXEL	C	-0.98%
WLK	C	-0.97%
NEU	D	-0.96%
RBA	D	-0.95%
SKX	C	-0.94%
ESAB	C	-0.94%
LOPE	D	-0.88%
RMBS	F	-0.86%
WSO	C	-0.86%
CIVI	F	-0.84%
ALTR	C	-0.83%
PSTG	F	-0.83%
PLNT	C	-0.83%
LNW	F	-0.82%
CR	B	-0.79%
RBC	B	-0.79%
GTLS	F	-0.78%
WMS	D	-0.75%
BCO	B	-0.75%
TREX	F	-0.73%
ACHC	D	-0.72%
LECO	D	-0.7%
QLYS	D	-0.65%
ARWR	F	-0.6%
VNT	F	-0.6%
PEN	D	-0.56%
DBX	C	-0.54%
FCN	C	-0.52%
COTY	D	-0.45%
FIVE	D	-0.39%
CAR	D	-0.39%
PGNY	F	-0.36%