LRGC vs. FWD ETF Comparison

Comparison of AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) to AB Disruptors ETF (FWD)

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGC Description

The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). The Adviser seeks to achieve the fund"s investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in the equity securities of large-capitalization U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.80

Average Daily Volume

18,107

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FWD

AB Disruptors ETF

FWD Description

FWD seeks capital growth by actively investing in companies globally, believed to be at the forefront of innovative growth trends. The funds adviser considers such companies as market disrupters. Many may utilize technology to enhance or create new demand for their product or service. The selection process combines a top-down evaluation of macroeconomic growth trends with fundamental, bottom-up analysis of individual companies. Factors such as current and projected profitability, pricing power, competitiveness, technological superiority, and management robustness of a company are considered. Targeted themes may include cloud infrastructure & AI, energy transition, transportation & logistics, medical innovation, digital transactions & media, and industrial innovation. The resulting portfolio of 80-120 stocks is considered non-diversified and may heavily focus on industries within the Information Technology sector.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$83.95

Average Daily Volume

20,955

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LRGC	FWD
30 Days	2.59%	6.41%
60 Days	4.16%	8.28%
90 Days	5.96%	8.11%
12 Months	32.95%	46.37%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in LRGC	Weight in FWD	Overlap
ADBE	C	1.31%	0.71%	0.71%
AMZN	C	4.24%	1.73%	1.73%
AVGO	D	2.18%	1.29%	1.29%
BKR	B	1.24%	0.85%	0.85%
ETN	A	1.56%	1.09%	1.09%
GEV	B	0.95%	2.15%	0.95%
HUBS	A	0.51%	0.65%	0.51%
ILMN	D	0.52%	0.56%	0.52%
IQV	D	1.26%	0.43%	0.43%
META	D	3.56%	1.41%	1.41%
MSFT	F	7.65%	0.7%	0.7%
NEE	D	0.71%	0.79%	0.71%
NOW	A	0.38%	0.55%	0.38%
NVDA	C	7.61%	5.29%	5.29%
ORCL	B	2.25%	1.81%	1.81%
TMO	F	0.78%	0.58%	0.58%

LRGC Overweight 55 Positions Relative to FWD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GOOG	C	4.81%
AAPL	C	4.42%
V	A	3.58%
UNH	C	2.99%
WMT	A	2.24%
GS	A	1.86%
WFC	A	1.82%
SCHW	B	1.68%
PGR	A	1.62%
HD	A	1.46%
BAC	A	1.38%
CSX	B	1.38%
TMUS	B	1.36%
MDT	D	1.33%
NXPI	D	1.17%
EOG	A	1.14%
VRTX	F	1.12%
CMCSA	B	1.12%
DIS	B	1.12%
FI	A	0.98%
PLD	D	0.97%
WAT	B	0.95%
CTVA	C	0.93%
KO	D	0.92%
LIN	D	0.92%
PCAR	B	0.88%
LYB	F	0.83%
PG	A	0.81%
AEP	D	0.76%
MRK	F	0.73%
COST	B	0.72%
STZ	D	0.72%
OTIS	C	0.7%
SBUX	A	0.64%
ZTS	D	0.64%
CVX	A	0.64%
KLAC	D	0.63%
AZO	C	0.62%
HON	B	0.6%
REGN	F	0.6%
TSM	B	0.59%
NKE	D	0.58%
DE	A	0.56%
AMT	D	0.55%
ELV	F	0.55%
WTW	B	0.53%
PNR	A	0.41%
CDW	F	0.4%
EW	C	0.4%
HCA	F	0.38%
QCOM	F	0.37%
H	B	0.37%
BAH	F	0.31%
WDC	D	0.26%
GEN	B	0.12%

LRGC Underweight 63 Positions Relative to FWD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	-3.08%
VST	B	-2.35%
VRT	B	-1.67%
ISRG	A	-1.62%
BSX	B	-1.56%
NFLX	A	-1.54%
ANET	C	-1.53%
TXN	C	-1.51%
SHOP	B	-1.39%
PLTR	B	-1.33%
GOOGL	C	-1.3%
HWM	A	-1.21%
SPOT	B	-1.16%
FTNT	C	-1.15%
EPAM	C	-1.14%
CRWD	B	-1.11%
APO	B	-1.09%
COHR	B	-1.06%
DASH	A	-1.06%
TTD	B	-1.05%
TT	A	-1.05%
MRVL	B	-1.02%
MU	D	-1.01%
DDOG	A	-0.99%
CAT	B	-0.98%
ON	D	-0.98%
IOT	A	-0.98%
TEAM	A	-0.95%
LSCC	D	-0.94%
LRCX	F	-0.94%
TER	D	-0.93%
ARM	D	-0.91%
MDB	C	-0.91%
AMAT	F	-0.87%
WAB	B	-0.86%
SYK	C	-0.81%
GWRE	A	-0.79%
LLY	F	-0.76%
CIEN	B	-0.74%
FROG	C	-0.74%
MNDY	C	-0.74%
ABBV	D	-0.73%
SNPS	B	-0.72%
RBLX	C	-0.72%
AMD	F	-0.7%
LITE	B	-0.66%
AFRM	B	-0.66%
SLAB	D	-0.65%
BKNG	A	-0.63%
ADI	D	-0.63%
MELI	D	-0.62%
GTLB	B	-0.53%
RDDT	B	-0.53%
ABT	B	-0.52%
UBER	D	-0.52%
CRL	C	-0.5%
BSY	D	-0.48%
CFLT	B	-0.48%
ABNB	C	-0.46%
IPGP	D	-0.44%
FCX	D	-0.42%
RGEN	D	-0.41%
Z	A	-0.4%