FWD vs. CZAR ETF Comparison

Comparison of AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR)
FWD

AB Disruptors ETF

FWD Description

FWD seeks capital growth by actively investing in companies globally, believed to be at the forefront of innovative growth trends. The funds adviser considers such companies as market disrupters. Many may utilize technology to enhance or create new demand for their product or service. The selection process combines a top-down evaluation of macroeconomic growth trends with fundamental, bottom-up analysis of individual companies. Factors such as current and projected profitability, pricing power, competitiveness, technological superiority, and management robustness of a company are considered. Targeted themes may include cloud infrastructure & AI, energy transition, transportation & logistics, medical innovation, digital transactions & media, and industrial innovation. The resulting portfolio of 80-120 stocks is considered non-diversified and may heavily focus on industries within the Information Technology sector.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$78.43

Average Daily Volume

17,517

Number of Holdings *

82

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZAR

Themes Natural Monopoly ETF

CZAR Description The index is designed to provide exposure to companies in the large- and mid- capitalization segments that exhibit a strong competitive advantage in their respective sector. The fund will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that comprise the index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.98

Average Daily Volume

201

Number of Holdings *

44

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FWD CZAR
30 Days -0.41% -2.47%
60 Days 0.77% -0.96%
90 Days 9.22% 4.49%
12 Months 50.74%
7 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FWD Weight in CZAR Overlap
ABNB C 0.48% 0.4% 0.4%
ADBE F 0.95% 2.75% 0.95%
ADI C 0.71% 3.27% 0.71%
IQV F 0.8% 0.3% 0.3%
META B 1.91% 3.5% 1.91%
UBER C 0.6% 0.41% 0.41%
XYL F 0.47% 0.85% 0.47%
FWD Overweight 75 Positions Relative to CZAR
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B 5.41%
ORCL B 2.05%
GEV A 1.76%
VST B 1.74%
ANET B 1.67%
ISRG B 1.59%
TSLA A 1.55%
AVGO B 1.54%
BSX B 1.5%
NFLX A 1.4%
AMZN B 1.28%
PLTR B 1.24%
MPWR F 1.14%
MRVL B 1.14%
MU C 1.13%
SPOT A 1.11%
HWM B 1.1%
TTD A 1.08%
SHOP B 1.07%
ETN B 1.07%
AAPL C 1.05%
AMD F 1.05%
FTNT B 1.03%
TXN B 1.03%
TT C 1.03%
VRT B 1.03%
CRWD C 1.01%
CAT B 1.0%
IOT B 0.98%
LLY D 0.96%
AMAT F 0.96%
ON D 0.96%
EPAM F 0.95%
MELI C 0.94%
COHR B 0.89%
MNDY B 0.88%
NEE D 0.87%
MDB F 0.86%
WAB A 0.84%
GWRE B 0.79%
ABT C 0.78%
TEAM B 0.77%
SYK C 0.76%
ABBV A 0.75%
DDOG B 0.75%
BKR A 0.74%
CRL F 0.71%
SNPS B 0.69%
LRCX F 0.68%
DASH A 0.67%
TMO F 0.65%
LITE B 0.63%
ILMN B 0.62%
ARM B 0.62%
CRUS F 0.57%
HUBS B 0.55%
BKNG A 0.55%
NOW B 0.54%
MSFT D 0.53%
FROG C 0.52%
LSCC C 0.51%
BSY F 0.51%
TER F 0.51%
GOOGL A 0.5%
CIEN B 0.49%
CALX C 0.47%
REGN F 0.46%
FCX D 0.46%
RGEN F 0.46%
SLAB F 0.46%
AFRM A 0.45%
MEDP F 0.44%
PI C 0.42%
ENPH F 0.34%
Z D 0.33%
FWD Underweight 37 Positions Relative to CZAR
Symbol Grade Weight
CSCO B -3.9%
OTEX D -3.43%
APO B -3.4%
FTV F -3.35%
AXP B -3.28%
AJG D -3.11%
BMY A -2.38%
GILD A -2.37%
VRTX A -1.86%
KVUE A -1.25%
KO D -1.07%
PEP D -1.05%
PG D -1.03%
AME A -0.88%
SNA A -0.64%
CVX C -0.63%
CPAY B -0.6%
MA B -0.53%
EXC C -0.53%
CHTR D -0.52%
CMCSA A -0.5%
ROL D -0.48%
V A -0.48%
LKQ F -0.47%
GPN D -0.46%
ECL C -0.41%
LIN C -0.39%
WCN D -0.38%
CNI F -0.36%
STLA F -0.35%
T A -0.33%
FDX C -0.33%
DGX A -0.31%
VZ D -0.29%
VMC A -0.29%
RSG D -0.24%
GPC F -0.14%
Compare ETFs