BEDZ vs. SEMI ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI)
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
BEDZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.18
Average Daily Volume
344
27
SEMI
Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF
SEMI Description
SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.89
Average Daily Volume
4,016
33
Performance
| Period | BEDZ | SEMI |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.23% | 8.71% |
| 60 Days | -3.23% | 9.48% |
| 90 Days | -0.69% | 11.82% |
| 12 Months | 15.78% | 40.20% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in BEDZ | Weight in SEMI | Overlap |
|---|
BEDZ Overweight 27 Positions Relative to SEMI
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNG | C | 5.15% | |
| XHR | D | 5.06% | |
| TCOM | B | 5.01% | |
| EXPE | F | 5.0% | |
| TH | D | 4.93% | |
| MAR | D | 4.7% | |
| RHP | D | 4.6% | |
| PK | D | 4.55% | |
| APLE | F | 4.49% | |
| HST | D | 4.43% | |
| VICI | C | 4.16% | |
| MGM | F | 4.09% | |
| HLT | D | 3.93% | |
| BYD | F | 3.92% | |
| RLJ | F | 3.56% | |
| TRIP | F | 3.42% | |
| WH | F | 3.41% | |
| RCL | B | 3.27% | |
| GLPI | C | 3.22% | |
| PLYA | D | 3.15% | |
| H | D | 2.44% | |
| IHG | D | 2.26% | |
| HGV | D | 2.12% | |
| GHG | D | 1.8% | |
| HTHT | C | 1.75% | |
| ABNB | D | 1.66% | |
| MCRI | D | 1.48% |
BEDZ Underweight 33 Positions Relative to SEMI
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | D | -7.58% | |
| SMTC | B | -6.94% | |
| AVGO | B | -6.77% | |
| NVDA | C | -4.82% | |
| AMAT | B | -4.63% | |
| ADI | B | -4.61% | |
| NXPI | B | -4.37% | |
| MRVL | C | -4.24% | |
| KLAC | B | -4.16% | |
| ON | D | -3.84% | |
| MCHP | B | -3.43% | |
| TSM | B | -3.3% | |
| TER | B | -3.27% | |
| WDC | C | -3.18% | |
| QCOM | B | -3.16% | |
| QRVO | F | -2.73% | |
| INDI | D | -2.36% | |
| SYNA | D | -2.05% | |
| MU | B | -1.92% | |
| BE | C | -1.88% | |
| STM | F | -1.87% | |
| SNPS | C | -1.85% | |
| AEIS | C | -1.82% | |
| CDNS | D | -1.77% | |
| INTC | F | -1.39% | |
| SWKS | F | -1.26% | |
| SGH | F | -0.7% | |
| ICHR | D | -0.66% | |
| AMD | D | -0.65% | |
| KLIC | D | -0.6% | |
| DIOD | C | -0.5% | |
| MKSI | C | -0.49% | |
| ENTG | D | -0.42% |
BEDZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SEMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
