XMHQ vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$106.90

Average Daily Volume

305,174

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.61

Average Daily Volume

17,043

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	RFG
30 Days	5.88%	8.80%
60 Days	4.14%	6.30%
90 Days	5.12%	6.63%
12 Months	30.03%	34.64%

33 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in RFG	Overlap
AIT	A	1.4%	1.1%	1.1%
BLD	D	1.59%	1.64%	1.59%
CELH	F	1.13%	0.79%	0.79%
COKE	C	0.9%	1.05%	0.9%
CR	A	1.44%	0.88%	0.88%
CROX	D	1.02%	0.76%	0.76%
DT	C	1.66%	1.29%	1.29%
ELF	C	0.93%	1.38%	0.93%
EME	C	3.81%	2.07%	2.07%
EXP	A	1.45%	1.55%	1.45%
FIX	A	2.48%	2.75%	2.48%
KNSL	B	1.8%	1.6%	1.6%
LECO	B	2.08%	0.75%	0.75%
LNTH	D	0.94%	1.31%	0.94%
LOPE	B	0.64%	0.97%	0.64%
MANH	D	4.08%	1.05%	1.05%
MEDP	D	1.62%	1.41%	1.41%
MUSA	A	1.43%	1.84%	1.43%
NEU	C	0.6%	0.94%	0.6%
OC	A	2.16%	1.65%	1.65%
PRI	A	1.35%	1.06%	1.06%
PSTG	D	1.86%	0.79%	0.79%
QLYS	C	0.94%	0.75%	0.75%
RS	B	2.38%	1.25%	1.25%
SSD	D	1.01%	1.24%	1.01%
TOL	B	2.03%	2.15%	2.03%
TREX	C	1.3%	0.69%	0.69%
UFPI	B	1.21%	1.08%	1.08%
VNT	B	0.91%	0.66%	0.66%
VVV	F	0.8%	1.16%	0.8%
WFRD	D	0.96%	1.4%	0.96%
WMS	D	1.34%	0.62%	0.62%
WSM	B	3.43%	0.96%	0.96%

XMHQ Overweight 43 Positions Relative to RFG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSL	C	3.86%
THC	D	2.39%
RNR	C	2.28%
GGG	B	2.05%
CW	B	1.83%
DKS	C	1.57%
AYI	B	1.43%
CVLT	B	1.38%
INGR	B	1.32%
AFG	A	1.3%
RGLD	C	1.3%
CHE	D	1.3%
SEIC	B	1.28%
PCTY	B	1.22%
CNM	D	1.2%
LSTR	D	1.13%
DCI	B	1.12%
RLI	B	1.1%
LSCC	D	1.09%
SAIC	F	1.03%
G	B	0.94%
ROIV	C	0.9%
CHX	C	0.88%
DINO	D	0.87%
KBH	D	0.85%
MSA	D	0.84%
CBT	C	0.82%
MTG	C	0.81%
ESNT	D	0.74%
EXPO	D	0.74%
CRUS	D	0.66%
MSM	C	0.66%
LANC	C	0.52%
FHI	A	0.51%
IBOC	A	0.49%
ENS	D	0.49%
TEX	D	0.48%
SAM	C	0.48%
YETI	C	0.48%
NSP	D	0.47%
VC	D	0.39%
CXT	B	0.35%
CRI	D	0.32%

XMHQ Underweight 53 Positions Relative to RFG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	-3.65%
DUOL	A	-3.18%
AAON	B	-2.56%
RYAN	B	-2.28%
APPF	B	-1.67%
PR	B	-1.67%
H	B	-1.61%
CLH	B	-1.56%
WING	D	-1.5%
TXRH	C	-1.31%
ANF	C	-1.27%
RRC	B	-1.25%
EXEL	B	-1.24%
PK	B	-1.22%
FN	D	-1.22%
CHDN	B	-1.21%
LII	A	-1.17%
SAIA	B	-1.16%
NVT	B	-1.13%
OVV	B	-1.13%
RMBS	C	-1.11%
CASY	A	-1.11%
ESAB	B	-1.09%
ONTO	D	-1.09%
RBA	A	-1.02%
GTLS	B	-1.02%
TPX	B	-0.98%
CHRD	D	-0.94%
FND	C	-0.93%
PLNT	A	-0.93%
VAL	D	-0.92%
SKX	D	-0.91%
WSO	A	-0.89%
ALTR	B	-0.89%
WLK	D	-0.83%
MTDR	B	-0.83%
RBC	A	-0.82%
HLNE	B	-0.79%
OLED	D	-0.78%
CIVI	D	-0.77%
LNW	D	-0.67%
PEN	B	-0.66%
ENSG	D	-0.62%
BCO	D	-0.6%
DBX	B	-0.59%
BYD	C	-0.58%
HALO	F	-0.55%
ARWR	F	-0.52%
CAR	C	-0.45%
FCN	D	-0.44%
ACHC	F	-0.35%
FIVE	F	-0.34%
COTY	F	-0.34%