XHS vs. PFUT ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$92.77

Average Daily Volume

4,010

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PFUT

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF

PFUT Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund invests mainly in common stocks of U.S. companies of any size, with a focus on companies whose products and services provide solutions that directly contribute to sustainable social, environmental and economic development (Impact Companies). Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of the value of its net assets in securities that meet Putnam Management?s sustainability criteria. In applying these criteria, Putnam Management will assign each company a proprietary environmental, social and/or corporate governance (ESG) rating ranging from 1 to 4.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.99

Average Daily Volume

22,921

Number of Holdings *

78

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS PFUT
30 Days -1.74% 0.86%
60 Days -4.02% 2.76%
90 Days -3.81% 6.13%
12 Months 10.65% 30.06%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in PFUT Overlap
HQY A 2.56% 1.11% 1.11%
XHS Overweight 57 Positions Relative to PFUT
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C 2.63%
RDNT B 2.5%
MCK A 2.46%
GH B 2.36%
PINC B 2.35%
EHC B 2.27%
LH B 2.26%
CAH B 2.24%
SEM B 2.21%
DGX A 2.13%
RCM A 2.12%
COR B 2.12%
THC C 2.1%
PRVA C 2.1%
UNH B 2.09%
CHE D 2.05%
ENSG D 2.0%
CVS D 1.99%
DVA C 1.98%
HSIC C 1.98%
ADUS D 1.96%
AMED F 1.95%
PDCO F 1.87%
CI D 1.86%
HUM C 1.84%
HCA F 1.83%
UHS D 1.81%
MOH F 1.79%
USPH B 1.7%
SGRY F 1.67%
CRVL A 1.65%
CNC F 1.63%
ELV F 1.55%
BKD F 1.48%
OMI F 1.48%
NEO C 1.45%
OPCH F 1.45%
MD C 1.41%
AHCO D 1.25%
CLOV C 1.25%
CSTL D 1.24%
LFST C 1.24%
PGNY F 1.21%
ALHC C 1.14%
AMN F 1.06%
ACHC F 1.05%
NHC C 1.02%
ASTH F 1.01%
AGL F 1.01%
PNTG D 0.71%
ACCD F 0.64%
OPK B 0.64%
CYH F 0.63%
CCRN F 0.59%
MODV C 0.52%
FLGT F 0.42%
NRC F 0.31%
XHS Underweight 77 Positions Relative to PFUT
Symbol Grade Weight
ROP C -2.09%
TMO D -2.06%
VRT A -2.05%
ISRG A -2.01%
DHR D -1.99%
SFM B -1.94%
IT C -1.87%
FSS B -1.85%
MSCI C -1.83%
FICO A -1.8%
DDOG A -1.78%
NEE C -1.77%
CEG C -1.77%
HASI F -1.72%
XYL D -1.71%
MA B -1.69%
PWR A -1.68%
CWST A -1.62%
ICLR D -1.53%
PINS F -1.52%
NOW B -1.51%
REGN F -1.48%
RMD C -1.45%
TPG A -1.4%
MTN C -1.38%
CDNS B -1.38%
AMAT F -1.38%
COF B -1.35%
ADBE D -1.32%
STX D -1.3%
EXAS D -1.29%
HUBS A -1.28%
GPK D -1.28%
RRX B -1.27%
WY D -1.26%
CPB D -1.25%
ZBRA B -1.23%
IDXX F -1.22%
DAR C -1.22%
FWRG C -1.21%
CTAS B -1.2%
ZTS D -1.19%
ASML F -1.17%
CMG C -1.15%
ADI D -1.15%
PEN B -1.1%
ONON B -1.08%
MTD F -1.07%
LULU C -1.04%
LEVI F -1.04%
TRMB B -1.04%
VRSK A -1.03%
VERX A -1.03%
ALTR B -0.99%
SUM B -0.98%
HAE C -0.98%
UBER F -0.96%
SNPS C -0.94%
COIN B -0.93%
CNM C -0.92%
FSLR F -0.87%
VRRM F -0.78%
ECL D -0.77%
ESTC C -0.75%
KKR B -0.64%
BMRN F -0.64%
URI B -0.62%
ARGX A -0.6%
GEV A -0.56%
PL B -0.54%
ASND F -0.52%
SGBX F -0.49%
AZN F -0.49%
DXCM C -0.46%
TWST F -0.43%
RCKT F -0.29%
CMPS F -0.25%
Compare ETFs