SIXS vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)

SIXS

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF

SIXS Description

The investment seeks to provide capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in small-capitalization equity securities. The Sub-Adviser considers small-capitalization companies to be the smallest 75% of stocks included in the Russell 3000 Index by market capitalization. Although it invests primarily in small-capitalization securities, the fund may invest in equity securities of companies of any capitalization. The equity securities in which it invests are mainly common stocks.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.42

Average Daily Volume

3,361

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.99

Average Daily Volume

67,595

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SIXS	PGJ
30 Days	-0.37%	7.36%
60 Days	1.08%	10.93%
90 Days	0.80%	21.09%
12 Months	18.56%	5.66%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in SIXS	Weight in PGJ	Overlap

SIXS Overweight 80 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PRDO	A	2.45%
CALM	D	2.32%
INVA	B	2.29%
COLL	C	2.24%
EIG	D	2.17%
HCI	B	1.35%
HCC	B	1.34%
SM	B	1.31%
SLCA	A	1.3%
MLI	B	1.3%
VRRM	A	1.27%
NPK	A	1.26%
WRLD	B	1.26%
RGR	C	1.24%
PRG	B	1.23%
LRN	A	1.22%
HP	F	1.2%
ANDE	B	1.2%
AVA	B	1.2%
GRBK	C	1.19%
UVV	B	1.19%
ZEUS	F	1.19%
CVI	F	1.18%
NWN	B	1.18%
BRC	B	1.18%
AX	A	1.17%
CRC	F	1.17%
OGN	B	1.17%
PFBC	A	1.17%
CRVL	C	1.16%
JBSS	F	1.16%
ATEN	A	1.16%
SMPL	B	1.16%
CTRE	B	1.16%
CLW	B	1.16%
GDEN	F	1.16%
DNOW	D	1.16%
AEL	A	1.15%
HAFC	C	1.15%
VRTS	D	1.15%
GTY	C	1.14%
PMT	A	1.14%
SAFT	C	1.14%
RES	F	1.13%
ENVA	B	1.12%
WABC	B	1.12%
ATGE	A	1.12%
LQDT	D	1.11%
MMSI	B	1.11%
MHO	D	1.11%
HSTM	B	1.11%
CCRN	F	1.11%
SPNT	C	1.11%
PBH	D	1.11%
NSIT	A	1.11%
SCSC	C	1.1%
JJSF	F	1.1%
PLAB	C	1.1%
AMBC	D	1.09%
NHC	D	1.09%
PRGS	F	1.09%
MOV	D	1.08%
TR	F	1.08%
CORT	D	1.08%
SPTN	D	1.07%
ENSG	D	1.06%
MCS	F	1.06%
HRMY	C	1.06%
PARR	F	1.05%
WOR	D	1.04%
BKE	D	1.03%
TWI	F	1.03%
WNC	F	1.01%
CCOI	F	1.01%
WDFC	D	0.99%
PCRX	F	0.98%
AMSF	F	0.98%
FIZZ	D	0.95%
ALKS	F	0.93%
OSUR	D	0.85%

SIXS Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	-8.12%
TCOM	A	-7.97%
YUMC	F	-7.34%
BIDU	C	-7.28%
NTES	C	-5.86%
JD	B	-5.2%
TME	A	-4.85%
BEKE	B	-4.44%
ZTO	B	-4.37%
HTHT	B	-3.65%
BZ	A	-3.49%
VIPS	D	-3.25%
YMM	A	-3.25%
NIO	D	-3.15%
TAL	B	-2.88%
LI	F	-2.31%
IQ	B	-1.51%
QFIN	A	-1.5%
MNSO	B	-0.99%
ATHM	C	-0.98%
XPEV	D	-0.96%
DQ	F	-0.9%
BILI	B	-0.89%
HOLI	D	-0.87%
RLX	B	-0.78%
ATAT	C	-0.62%
CSIQ	F	-0.6%
GOTU	C	-0.58%
MOMO	C	-0.58%
JKS	D	-0.56%
FINV	B	-0.53%
WB	C	-0.47%
ZLAB	F	-0.45%
GDS	C	-0.42%
EH	B	-0.41%
TIGR	D	-0.28%
QD	A	-0.28%
HUYA	B	-0.24%
NOAH	B	-0.24%
SOHU	B	-0.23%
KC	C	-0.15%
VNET	D	-0.14%
LX	D	-0.14%
DADA	D	-0.13%
CAN	F	-0.12%
TUYA	C	-0.12%
DDL	C	-0.11%
API	D	-0.11%
ZH	F	-0.11%
DAO	F	-0.08%
IMAB	F	-0.07%