RFG vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.56

Average Daily Volume

54,203

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$104.84

Average Daily Volume

346,176

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	XMHQ
30 Days	-2.78%	-3.75%
60 Days	-0.55%	-0.26%
90 Days	14.29%	12.48%
12 Months	38.72%	45.93%

27 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in XMHQ	Overlap
BLD	D	2.09%	1.86%	1.86%
BYD	F	0.46%	0.6%	0.46%
CELH	D	2.41%	2.53%	2.41%
CNX	B	2.46%	1.05%	1.05%
COKE	B	0.77%	0.62%	0.62%
EME	A	1.61%	2.87%	1.61%
EXP	B	1.42%	1.52%	1.42%
KNSL	F	1.31%	1.65%	1.31%
LOPE	C	0.86%	0.65%	0.65%
MANH	F	0.86%	3.44%	0.86%
MEDP	D	1.94%	2.4%	1.94%
MTDR	D	1.02%	1.09%	1.02%
MUSA	D	1.57%	1.71%	1.57%
NEU	D	0.97%	0.78%	0.78%
OC	A	1.55%	2.26%	1.55%
QLYS	D	0.93%	1.55%	0.93%
RRC	B	1.49%	2.03%	1.49%
RS	D	1.26%	2.68%	1.26%
SWN	C	2.54%	2.16%	2.16%
TOL	C	1.83%	1.86%	1.83%
TREX	D	0.97%	1.39%	0.97%
TXRH	A	1.12%	1.6%	1.12%
UFPI	C	1.03%	0.95%	0.95%
WFRD	B	2.35%	1.66%	1.66%
WMS	C	0.82%	2.15%	0.82%
WSM	A	1.12%	3.74%	1.12%
WSO	A	0.82%	2.23%	0.82%

RFG Overweight 54 Positions Relative to XMHQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
VST	A	2.59%
DUOL	A	2.53%
PR	B	2.12%
ELF	D	2.09%
FIX	C	2.05%
WING	A	1.95%
APPF	C	1.84%
H	C	1.71%
PK	D	1.5%
OVV	B	1.48%
CHRD	B	1.45%
RMBS	F	1.4%
VAL	D	1.4%
ONTO	A	1.4%
CLH	A	1.3%
SSD	D	1.29%
NVT	A	1.25%
VVV	B	1.25%
LNTH	B	1.22%
DT	F	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
CIVI	B	1.2%
FND	D	1.07%
SKX	A	1.06%
CROX	D	1.06%
WLK	B	1.05%
ESAB	B	1.01%
SAIA	F	0.99%
TPX	D	0.99%
LII	D	0.98%
GTLS	C	0.98%
CASY	B	0.96%
PSTG	C	0.92%
EXEL	D	0.91%
LECO	D	0.88%
OLED	C	0.82%
AIT	C	0.81%
PRI	D	0.81%
VNT	D	0.77%
PGNY	F	0.75%
ACHC	F	0.74%
LNW	D	0.71%
RBC	D	0.69%
ARWR	F	0.69%
GDDY	A	0.66%
PLNT	F	0.63%
BCO	A	0.63%
FIVE	F	0.61%
PEN	F	0.6%
COTY	D	0.59%
DBX	F	0.56%
FCN	B	0.51%
CAR	D	0.49%
HALO	D	0.49%

RFG Underweight 48 Positions Relative to XMHQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSL	A	-3.0%
LSCC	D	-2.0%
RNR	D	-1.99%
GGG	D	-1.9%
ERIE	C	-1.71%
PBF	C	-1.55%
TTEK	A	-1.52%
CHE	F	-1.35%
DCI	B	-1.31%
AFG	D	-1.3%
EHC	A	-1.28%
LSTR	D	-1.24%
AYI	C	-1.17%
AGCO	F	-1.14%
SEIC	C	-1.12%
CHX	D	-1.12%
GNTX	D	-1.1%
AIRC	A	-1.07%
PCTY	D	-1.02%
AMG	C	-0.99%
OLN	D	-0.98%
SAIC	D	-0.98%
RLI	D	-0.98%
WU	C	-0.93%
EVR	B	-0.91%
WH	D	-0.91%
TMHC	C	-0.89%
MSM	F	-0.82%
MTG	C	-0.8%
WTS	C	-0.79%
ESNT	D	-0.79%
G	D	-0.79%
EXPO	B	-0.75%
CBT	A	-0.73%
PII	F	-0.73%
EXLS	D	-0.71%
ASH	A	-0.7%
TEX	D	-0.67%
POWI	D	-0.62%
LANC	D	-0.58%
NSP	D	-0.56%
BDC	C	-0.53%
CACC	D	-0.5%
FHI	F	-0.47%
IBOC	A	-0.41%
SAM	F	-0.39%
IPGP	F	-0.38%
GEF	D	-0.22%