RFG vs. BKWO ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to BNY Mellon Women's Opportunities ETF (BKWO)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.79

Average Daily Volume

16,526

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

BKWO

BNY Mellon Women's Opportunities ETF

BKWO Description

To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests principally in equity securities of U.S. companies that, in the view of the fund's sub-adviser, demonstrate attractive financial attributes and promote Women's Opportunities. Women's Opportunities is defined as opportunities that enhance the professional development and advancement of women and/or the ability of women to meet their work or other personal life responsibilities and needs, such as those relating to household responsibilities, dependent/elder care responsibilities, and gender-specific healthcare. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.26

Average Daily Volume

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	BKWO
30 Days	6.29%	1.48%
60 Days	5.48%	4.21%
90 Days	4.97%	5.19%
12 Months	32.54%	30.76%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in BKWO	Overlap
	NVT	B	1.13%	1.07%	1.07%

RFG Overweight 85 Positions Relative to BKWO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	3.65%
DUOL	A	3.18%
FIX	A	2.75%
AAON	B	2.56%
RYAN	A	2.28%
TOL	B	2.15%
EME	A	2.07%
MUSA	B	1.84%
APPF	B	1.67%
PR	B	1.67%
OC	A	1.65%
BLD	D	1.64%
H	B	1.61%
KNSL	B	1.6%
CLH	C	1.56%
EXP	B	1.55%
WING	D	1.5%
MEDP	D	1.41%
WFRD	D	1.4%
ELF	C	1.38%
LNTH	D	1.31%
TXRH	B	1.31%
DT	D	1.29%
ANF	F	1.27%
RS	B	1.25%
RRC	B	1.25%
EXEL	B	1.24%
SSD	F	1.24%
PK	C	1.22%
FN	C	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
LII	A	1.17%
SAIA	B	1.16%
VVV	D	1.16%
OVV	B	1.13%
RMBS	B	1.11%
CASY	A	1.11%
AIT	B	1.1%
ESAB	C	1.09%
ONTO	F	1.09%
UFPI	C	1.08%
PRI	B	1.06%
MANH	D	1.05%
COKE	C	1.05%
RBA	A	1.02%
GTLS	A	1.02%
TPX	B	0.98%
LOPE	C	0.97%
WSM	C	0.96%
CHRD	D	0.94%
NEU	D	0.94%
FND	D	0.93%
PLNT	A	0.93%
VAL	F	0.92%
SKX	D	0.91%
WSO	A	0.89%
ALTR	B	0.89%
CR	A	0.88%
WLK	D	0.83%
MTDR	B	0.83%
RBC	A	0.82%
CELH	F	0.79%
HLNE	B	0.79%
PSTG	D	0.79%
OLED	F	0.78%
CIVI	D	0.77%
CROX	D	0.76%
QLYS	B	0.75%
LECO	C	0.75%
TREX	C	0.69%
LNW	F	0.67%
PEN	B	0.66%
VNT	C	0.66%
ENSG	C	0.62%
WMS	F	0.62%
BCO	F	0.6%
DBX	B	0.59%
BYD	B	0.58%
HALO	F	0.55%
ARWR	D	0.52%
CAR	C	0.45%
FCN	F	0.44%
ACHC	F	0.35%
FIVE	F	0.34%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 46 Positions Relative to BKWO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	-8.96%
MSFT	D	-8.0%
AMZN	C	-5.94%
AAPL	C	-5.0%
META	D	-3.75%
JPM	A	-3.72%
ABBV	F	-3.27%
MA	B	-2.92%
UBER	F	-2.86%
SHOP	B	-2.61%
LLY	F	-2.53%
TT	A	-2.34%
BSX	A	-2.29%
INTU	B	-2.25%
BFAM	D	-2.14%
PGR	A	-1.99%
HUBS	A	-1.97%
ACN	B	-1.95%
ETN	A	-1.87%
D	C	-1.84%
BAC	A	-1.71%
KO	D	-1.6%
PG	C	-1.45%
ZTS	D	-1.39%
FDX	B	-1.34%
MU	D	-1.3%
BBY	D	-1.2%
AKAM	D	-1.14%
TXN	C	-1.14%
CNC	D	-1.11%
HOLX	D	-1.09%
KVUE	A	-1.08%
ADUS	D	-1.07%
ILMN	C	-1.06%
OXY	D	-1.03%
SLB	C	-1.01%
FHN	A	-1.0%
CSGP	D	-0.96%
AVTR	F	-0.9%
DIS	B	-0.89%
COP	C	-0.83%
ISRG	A	-0.8%
VLTO	C	-0.78%
WDAY	B	-0.7%
NTRA	A	-0.6%
CSTM	F	-0.32%