QUVU vs. WLDR ETF Comparison

Comparison of Hartford Quality Value ETF (QUVU) to Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR)

QUVU

Hartford Quality Value ETF

QUVU Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in common stocks of issuers located in the United States. The fund may invest in a broad range of market capitalizations, but tends to focus on large capitalization companies with market capitalizations similar to those of companies in the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.85

Average Daily Volume

5,461

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WLDR

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF

WLDR Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index (the index). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities included in the index. The index is expected to consist of approximately 150 to 250 stocks of companies located in the U.S. and in at least three countries outside of the U.S. and may invest in up to 20 countries. It will be significantly invested in the securities of international companies in addition to securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.72

Average Daily Volume

3,014

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QUVU	WLDR
30 Days	1.94%	5.56%
60 Days	3.58%	5.63%
90 Days	4.59%	8.20%
12 Months	23.79%	36.70%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QUVU	Weight in WLDR	Overlap
CMCSA	B	1.3%	1.4%	1.3%
CTSH	B	1.81%	1.85%	1.81%
DAL	C	1.08%	0.37%	0.37%
ELV	F	1.42%	0.62%	0.62%
LMT	D	1.63%	0.94%	0.94%
OMC	C	1.98%	1.15%	1.15%
PFE	D	1.71%	1.87%	1.71%
PM	B	2.86%	1.04%	1.04%
SPG	B	1.16%	0.36%	0.36%
WMB	A	2.32%	1.05%	1.05%

QUVU Overweight 54 Positions Relative to WLDR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	A	3.89%
WFC	A	3.48%
UNH	C	3.46%
MS	A	2.98%
AXP	A	2.69%
EOG	A	2.27%
BAC	A	2.19%
KNX	B	2.11%
CSCO	B	2.04%
MDT	D	1.91%
ATO	A	1.83%
HON	B	1.82%
UL	D	1.81%
CVX	A	1.8%
AEP	D	1.73%
DUK	C	1.66%
MMC	B	1.63%
SRE	A	1.63%
PFG	D	1.58%
TTE	F	1.58%
ACN	C	1.55%
AZN	D	1.55%
DIS	B	1.44%
QCOM	F	1.42%
AMT	D	1.36%
TXN	C	1.33%
NVS	D	1.3%
FMC	D	1.3%
BDX	F	1.28%
WAB	B	1.27%
LKQ	D	1.25%
CB	C	1.25%
AIG	B	1.22%
ARMK	B	1.21%
KDP	D	1.21%
NXPI	D	1.17%
MRK	F	1.12%
TSN	B	1.05%
OTIS	C	0.98%
GOOGL	C	0.98%
AMCR	D	0.97%
CTRA	B	0.96%
PSA	D	0.92%
TJX	A	0.9%
SYY	B	0.89%
BHP	F	0.88%
HST	C	0.83%
MDLZ	F	0.8%
ROP	B	0.74%
MET	A	0.67%
KVUE	A	0.66%
LOW	D	0.57%
CE	F	0.4%
GILD	C	0.29%

QUVU Underweight 63 Positions Relative to WLDR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
APP	B	-3.84%
DELL	C	-3.19%
HPE	B	-2.98%
NTAP	C	-2.96%
META	D	-2.8%
AMAT	F	-2.71%
STX	D	-2.68%
BURL	A	-2.66%
CPNG	D	-2.32%
VTRS	A	-2.26%
DOCU	A	-2.03%
GEN	B	-1.87%
SSNC	B	-1.74%
EBAY	D	-1.64%
DFS	B	-1.43%
VZ	C	-1.35%
RF	A	-1.32%
BK	A	-1.3%
TROW	B	-1.28%
BRK.A	B	-1.21%
VRT	B	-1.18%
TEVA	D	-1.07%
BKR	B	-1.03%
OC	A	-0.95%
MO	A	-0.93%
MMM	D	-0.9%
TOL	B	-0.88%
USFD	A	-0.88%
KR	B	-0.87%
BCS	C	-0.81%
FANG	D	-0.81%
CCL	B	-0.79%
RCL	A	-0.78%
FI	A	-0.71%
SWK	D	-0.7%
CI	F	-0.7%
PYPL	B	-0.62%
ALL	A	-0.6%
HCA	F	-0.6%
THC	D	-0.59%
UHS	D	-0.57%
MKL	A	-0.56%
CNC	D	-0.54%
LOGI	D	-0.54%
GOLD	D	-0.52%
AER	B	-0.51%
CF	B	-0.5%
VST	B	-0.49%
RNR	C	-0.47%
EMN	D	-0.45%
UAL	A	-0.42%
ETR	B	-0.4%
PPL	B	-0.38%
FIS	C	-0.38%
EVRG	A	-0.36%
EXC	C	-0.36%
VICI	C	-0.31%
GLPI	C	-0.29%
LUV	C	-0.29%
DOC	D	-0.29%
CPT	B	-0.29%
PKG	A	-0.26%
NEM	D	-0.23%