QQQG vs. ROM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM)

QQQG

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QQQG Description

The initial Index universe is typically derived from the component companies of the Nasdaq-100 Index®. The initial universe of companies is typically screened based on their average projected free cash flows and earnings (if available) over each of the next two fiscal years. Under normal circumstances, the fund will seek to invest at least 80% of the fund"s total assets in growth securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.73

Average Daily Volume

2,148

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROM Description

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. TechnologySM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the technology sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, those involved in computers and office equipment, software, communications technology, semiconductors, diversified technology services and Internet services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.81

Average Daily Volume

35,837

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQQG	ROM
30 Days	4.30%	3.58%
60 Days	5.50%	8.67%
90 Days	4.76%	6.06%
12 Months		44.73%

22 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQQG	Weight in ROM	Overlap
AAPL	C	2.84%	10.41%	2.84%
ADBE	C	0.84%	1.77%	0.84%
ADI	D	2.73%	0.81%	0.81%
ADSK	A	1.47%	0.51%	0.51%
AMAT	F	3.21%	1.11%	1.11%
ANSS	B	1.17%	0.23%	0.23%
AVGO	D	4.6%	3.08%	3.08%
CDNS	B	1.13%	0.63%	0.63%
CRWD	B	1.04%	0.62%	0.62%
CSCO	B	1.34%	1.84%	1.34%
FTNT	C	1.48%	0.47%	0.47%
INTU	C	1.54%	1.53%	1.53%
KLAC	D	3.69%	0.66%	0.66%
LRCX	F	1.92%	0.72%	0.72%
MCHP	D	1.25%	0.27%	0.27%
MSFT	F	1.6%	9.39%	1.6%
NVDA	C	6.0%	10.63%	6.0%
NXPI	D	2.86%	0.44%	0.44%
PANW	C	1.35%	0.99%	0.99%
QCOM	F	2.91%	1.42%	1.42%
ROP	B	1.36%	0.47%	0.47%
SNPS	B	1.59%	0.63%	0.63%

QQQG Overweight 28 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TTD	B	5.16%
CTAS	B	3.69%
FANG	D	3.41%
META	D	3.25%
GOOGL	C	3.03%
NFLX	A	2.79%
DASH	A	2.39%
BKNG	A	2.37%
EA	A	2.08%
CPRT	A	2.05%
VRSK	A	1.93%
ADP	B	1.93%
MRVL	B	1.77%
PAYX	C	1.77%
REGN	F	1.62%
AMGN	D	1.38%
GILD	C	1.29%
CSX	B	1.2%
MELI	D	1.17%
DDOG	A	1.15%
ABNB	C	1.14%
MNST	C	0.99%
TEAM	A	0.95%
IDXX	F	0.86%
WDAY	B	0.8%
ZS	C	0.76%
LULU	C	0.61%
DXCM	D	0.47%

QQQG Underweight 46 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRM	B	-2.5%
ORCL	B	-2.33%
ACN	C	-1.76%
AMD	F	-1.73%
NOW	A	-1.65%
IBM	C	-1.5%
TXN	C	-1.46%
PLTR	B	-1.05%
MU	D	-0.85%
INTC	D	-0.82%
ANET	C	-0.77%
APH	A	-0.67%
MSI	B	-0.65%
FICO	B	-0.44%
IT	C	-0.32%
DELL	C	-0.3%
CTSH	B	-0.3%
HPQ	B	-0.29%
GLW	B	-0.28%
HPE	B	-0.22%
ON	D	-0.22%
MPWR	F	-0.22%
KEYS	A	-0.21%
TYL	B	-0.2%
GDDY	A	-0.2%
CDW	F	-0.19%
NTAP	C	-0.19%
PTC	A	-0.18%
TDY	B	-0.17%
ZBRA	B	-0.16%
STX	D	-0.16%
FSLR	F	-0.16%
WDC	D	-0.16%
TRMB	B	-0.14%
GEN	B	-0.13%
TER	D	-0.13%
JBL	B	-0.12%
VRSN	F	-0.12%
AKAM	D	-0.11%
SWKS	F	-0.11%
EPAM	C	-0.11%
FFIV	B	-0.11%
JNPR	F	-0.1%
SMCI	F	-0.07%
ENPH	F	-0.06%
QRVO	F	-0.05%