NULV vs. SCLZ ETF Comparison

or Try an Advanced Search...

NULV vs. SCLZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) to Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ)

NULV

NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

NULV Description

The Fund seeks to track the investments results, before fees and expenses, of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.73

Average Daily Volume

94,564

Number of Holdings ^*

103

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SCLZ

Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

SCLZ Description

SCLZ aims to maximize income through a portfolio of US dividend-paying companies combined with a covered call writing strategy. This strategy provides a potential buffer against market volatility, although the reduction is limited to the amount of option premium received. Based on the large- and mid-cap stocks of the OShares Focused Quality Dividend Index, the fund selects 50 names based on a composite score for quality and growth characteristics. The composite score considers quality factors, dividend growth, dividend coverage, and dividend yield. Note some stocks with superior dividend payouts and higher capital appreciation potential may be excluded if option premium potential is too low. Quarterly, constituents are re-ranked based on historic dividend yield and potential capital appreciation, with holdings sold when they are no longer listed. Risk management involves establishing pre-defined exit points for each option to reduce downside exposure while maximizing income.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.24

Average Daily Volume

1,765

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NULV	SCLZ
30 Days	1.68%	-0.30%
60 Days	2.71%	1.39%
90 Days	5.63%	2.20%
12 Months	25.44%

15 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in NULV	Weight in SCLZ	Overlap
ACN	B	0.03%	1.71%	0.03%
ADP	A	1.36%	1.53%	1.36%
CAT	B	1.04%	1.76%	1.04%
CBOE	C	0.85%	1.16%	0.85%
CSCO	B	1.48%	1.93%	1.48%
DE	B	1.6%	1.48%	1.48%
HD	B	0.76%	2.48%	0.76%
JNJ	C	1.64%	2.25%	1.64%
KO	D	2.11%	1.89%	1.89%
MMC	B	1.46%	1.43%	1.43%
MRK	D	1.52%	1.83%	1.52%
ORCL	A	2.85%	2.18%	2.18%
PEP	F	1.92%	1.68%	1.68%
SBUX	A	1.36%	1.48%	1.36%
TXN	C	1.97%	1.76%	1.76%

NULV Overweight 88 Positions Relative to SCLZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DIS	B	2.25%
IBM	C	2.05%
FI	A	1.99%
LOW	C	1.89%
VZ	C	1.89%
INTC	C	1.85%
C	A	1.82%
PNC	B	1.76%
OKE	A	1.74%
AMGN	F	1.71%
WELL	A	1.7%
DHR	F	1.69%
GS	A	1.69%
BKR	A	1.67%
BK	A	1.64%
ADI	D	1.56%
MS	A	1.54%
TRV	B	1.54%
CI	D	1.5%
PGR	A	1.5%
MMM	D	1.5%
KR	B	1.45%
COR	B	1.39%
HCA	F	1.37%
EXC	C	1.36%
ECL	D	1.29%
NXPI	D	1.28%
ED	C	1.26%
AXP	A	1.24%
BAC	A	1.23%
AMT	C	1.21%
CAH	B	1.2%
FDX	B	1.12%
FTV	C	1.08%
ADM	D	1.06%
RF	A	0.95%
UPS	C	0.93%
ES	C	0.88%
LYB	F	0.87%
FIS	C	0.82%
FSLR	F	0.81%
A	D	0.77%
KMB	C	0.72%
BR	A	0.71%
J	D	0.71%
CHD	A	0.7%
IR	B	0.7%
URI	C	0.7%
KDP	F	0.69%
WTW	B	0.68%
GILD	C	0.65%
JCI	B	0.64%
HPQ	B	0.59%
PPG	F	0.55%
STLD	B	0.54%
BG	D	0.51%
MET	A	0.45%
NEM	D	0.43%
PHM	D	0.42%
SOLV	D	0.41%
HIG	B	0.41%
EQIX	A	0.41%
ATO	A	0.4%
HOLX	D	0.37%
OC	A	0.36%
HOOD	B	0.35%
MOS	F	0.34%
CNP	A	0.32%
SPGI	C	0.29%
DINO	D	0.28%
QRVO	F	0.26%
IPG	D	0.23%
PSA	C	0.19%
WDC	D	0.19%
TGT	F	0.17%
TFC	A	0.17%
SYY	D	0.16%
ETN	A	0.14%
IRM	C	0.1%
BALL	F	0.1%
BMY	B	0.09%
ZBH	C	0.09%
PRU	A	0.08%
REGN	F	0.04%
AWK	C	0.04%
STE	D	0.02%
CNH	C	0.02%
WTRG	B	0.02%

NULV Underweight 34 Positions Relative to SCLZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GOOGL	C	-5.41%
AAPL	C	-4.96%
MSFT	D	-4.84%
AVGO	D	-3.47%
JPM	A	-3.37%
LLY	F	-2.99%
UNH	B	-2.86%
V	A	-2.85%
MA	B	-2.49%
PG	C	-2.43%
INTU	B	-1.81%
PM	B	-1.8%
ABT	B	-1.75%
MCD	D	-1.75%
QCOM	F	-1.68%
HON	C	-1.65%
TJX	A	-1.59%
MO	A	-1.49%
APH	A	-1.47%
LMT	D	-1.44%
ITW	B	-1.43%
PCAR	B	-1.42%
AON	A	-1.42%
SNA	A	-1.38%
CTAS	B	-1.37%
ZTS	D	-1.32%
GD	D	-1.32%
MDLZ	F	-1.28%
PAYX	B	-1.27%
OTIS	C	-1.27%
MSCI	C	-1.26%
CTSH	B	-1.23%
YUM	D	-1.2%
HSY	F	-1.09%