NBDS vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)
NBDS

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

NBDS Description

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. It invests in public equity markets of global region. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across information technology, healthcare, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.02

Average Daily Volume

3,101

Number of Holdings *

25

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$47.31

Average Daily Volume

52,420

Number of Holdings *

81

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period NBDS RFG
30 Days -6.31% -6.41%
60 Days -7.03% -1.73%
90 Days 1.49% 12.05%
12 Months 31.05% 33.50%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in NBDS Weight in RFG Overlap
ONTO B 4.01% 1.3% 1.3%
RMBS F 3.17% 1.3% 1.3%
NBDS Overweight 23 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C 7.99%
UBER D 5.43%
AMD D 5.07%
AMZN B 4.57%
ASML D 4.55%
TW B 4.36%
LLY B 4.34%
INTU C 4.32%
ISRG C 4.29%
TDG A 4.02%
MSFT C 3.71%
MPWR C 3.51%
DKNG C 3.46%
NOW D 3.38%
MDB D 3.29%
MRNA A 3.07%
PANW B 2.91%
IDXX D 2.75%
KEYS D 2.7%
SWAV A 2.57%
DXCM D 2.5%
SPOT B 2.27%
PCOR D 2.06%
NBDS Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
CNX B -2.53%
SWN B -2.5%
CELH C -2.35%
DUOL A -2.34%
VST A -2.28%
WFRD B -2.16%
PR B -2.13%
ELF D -2.02%
BLD C -2.0%
FIX D -2.0%
MEDP B -1.88%
WING A -1.85%
TOL B -1.76%
KNSL F -1.75%
APPF B -1.71%
H C -1.7%
MUSA B -1.59%
OC A -1.53%
PK D -1.52%
EME A -1.52%
OVV B -1.49%
RRC B -1.49%
CHRD B -1.47%
VAL D -1.42%
RS D -1.41%
SSD D -1.4%
EXP C -1.38%
CLH A -1.35%
SAIA F -1.27%
VVV C -1.26%
DT F -1.24%
CIVI D -1.21%
NVT B -1.21%
LNTH A -1.18%
CHDN A -1.15%
WSM A -1.13%
TXRH A -1.11%
NEU D -1.1%
WLK B -1.08%
FND D -1.07%
CROX D -1.07%
MTDR D -1.03%
UFPI D -1.03%
ESAB B -1.01%
GTLS D -1.01%
TPX C -0.98%
LII C -0.97%
MANH F -0.97%
TREX C -0.97%
CASY A -0.96%
SKX A -0.96%
QLYS D -0.96%
LECO D -0.95%
EXEL B -0.91%
PSTG B -0.91%
LOPE C -0.87%
PRI D -0.85%
AIT D -0.83%
WMS D -0.81%
OLED F -0.8%
COKE C -0.79%
PGNY F -0.78%
VNT D -0.77%
WSO A -0.76%
ARWR D -0.73%
LNW D -0.72%
ACHC D -0.71%
RBC D -0.7%
GDDY A -0.66%
PLNT F -0.64%
FIVE F -0.64%
BCO B -0.64%
PEN D -0.62%
COTY D -0.59%
BYD F -0.56%
DBX F -0.56%
FCN A -0.53%
HALO C -0.51%
CAR F -0.5%
Compare ETFs