IPDP vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.53

Average Daily Volume

1,371

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.96

Average Daily Volume

6,832

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period IPDP XHS
30 Days -5.51% -5.86%
60 Days -2.32% -2.31%
90 Days 1.45% 0.31%
12 Months 23.41% 1.79%
6 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in IPDP Weight in XHS Overlap
CAH D 1.8% 1.81% 1.8%
CHE D 1.75% 1.8% 1.75%
ELV A 2.08% 2.15% 2.08%
HUM F 1.08% 1.81% 1.08%
MCK A 2.14% 2.06% 2.06%
UNH B 1.64% 2.08% 1.64%
IPDP Overweight 43 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
ETN B 2.5%
AVGO D 2.41%
APOG A 2.38%
APH A 2.37%
TT A 2.36%
DOV A 2.33%
HIG C 2.32%
QCOM C 2.26%
TRV C 2.23%
KLAC C 2.22%
DCI B 2.16%
ITT B 2.15%
CTAS A 2.15%
RGA A 2.15%
HI F 2.15%
GWW D 2.13%
A C 2.13%
GPC B 2.09%
SYK D 2.07%
SEIC C 2.04%
SHW D 2.02%
BRC A 2.01%
FAST C 2.01%
AIT D 1.98%
MSI B 1.97%
AOS C 1.96%
HD D 1.94%
CSX D 1.94%
ABM A 1.92%
ADP B 1.91%
ABT D 1.89%
PAYX C 1.87%
WTS C 1.85%
ROK F 1.81%
MMC C 1.81%
CSCO D 1.79%
UPS F 1.79%
JNJ D 1.77%
NSP B 1.76%
SNA D 1.76%
ACN F 1.69%
AAPL F 1.6%
GL D 1.15%
IPDP Underweight 52 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
EHC A -2.22%
DGX A -2.22%
RDNT A -2.14%
CI A -2.11%
DVA A -2.07%
THC A -2.04%
SEM C -2.01%
OMI D -2.01%
PINC D -2.01%
AMED D -2.0%
HQY C -2.0%
HSIC D -1.98%
AMN D -1.98%
BKD A -1.98%
NEO F -1.97%
ENSG C -1.95%
UHS C -1.95%
PDCO F -1.94%
HCA C -1.94%
CNC D -1.91%
OPCH D -1.9%
LH F -1.9%
GH F -1.87%
PGNY F -1.86%
ACHC D -1.85%
NHC C -1.82%
CVS F -1.82%
RCM D -1.8%
MOH F -1.78%
HIMS C -1.78%
AGL F -1.75%
CRVL C -1.73%
SGRY D -1.7%
PRVA F -1.65%
CYH A -1.64%
ADUS B -1.48%
CCRN D -1.42%
MD F -1.38%
AHCO C -1.36%
OPK B -1.36%
USPH C -1.33%
ACCD F -1.25%
LFST C -1.21%
ASTH C -1.02%
CSTL B -0.96%
PETQ D -0.92%
DCGO F -0.92%
FLGT F -0.85%
ALHC D -0.83%
MODV F -0.72%
NRC D -0.5%
PNTG A -0.44%
Compare ETFs