IPDP vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.52

Average Daily Volume

1,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500Â® Dividend AristocratsÂ® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$96.77

Average Daily Volume

464,394

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	NOBL
30 Days	-5.51%	-3.88%
60 Days	-2.32%	-0.32%
90 Days	1.45%	1.54%
12 Months	23.41%	7.06%

11 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in NOBL	Overlap
ABT	D	1.89%	1.38%	1.38%
ADP	B	1.91%	1.48%	1.48%
AOS	C	1.96%	1.55%	1.55%
CAH	D	1.8%	1.42%	1.42%
CTAS	A	2.15%	1.58%	1.58%
DOV	A	2.33%	1.65%	1.65%
FAST	C	2.01%	1.4%	1.4%
GPC	B	2.09%	1.63%	1.63%
GWW	D	2.13%	1.57%	1.57%
JNJ	D	1.77%	1.33%	1.33%
SHW	D	2.02%	1.44%	1.44%

IPDP Overweight 38 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	B	2.5%
AVGO	D	2.41%
APOG	A	2.38%
APH	A	2.37%
TT	A	2.36%
HIG	C	2.32%
QCOM	C	2.26%
TRV	C	2.23%
KLAC	C	2.22%
DCI	B	2.16%
ITT	B	2.15%
RGA	A	2.15%
HI	F	2.15%
MCK	A	2.14%
A	C	2.13%
ELV	A	2.08%
SYK	D	2.07%
SEIC	C	2.04%
BRC	A	2.01%
AIT	D	1.98%
MSI	B	1.97%
HD	D	1.94%
CSX	D	1.94%
ABM	A	1.92%
PAYX	C	1.87%
WTS	C	1.85%
ROK	F	1.81%
MMC	C	1.81%
CSCO	D	1.79%
UPS	F	1.79%
NSP	B	1.76%
SNA	D	1.76%
CHE	D	1.75%
ACN	F	1.69%
UNH	B	1.64%
AAPL	F	1.6%
GL	D	1.15%
HUM	F	1.08%

IPDP Underweight 55 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CAT	D	-1.78%
XOM	B	-1.73%
TGT	D	-1.69%
KMB	A	-1.67%
NEE	A	-1.67%
MMM	A	-1.67%
ADM	D	-1.67%
HRL	A	-1.67%
EMR	C	-1.66%
MKC	B	-1.65%
CVX	A	-1.61%
WMT	C	-1.6%
ECL	B	-1.6%
PNR	C	-1.59%
CHD	A	-1.58%
WST	D	-1.58%
LIN	C	-1.58%
CL	A	-1.58%
LOW	D	-1.56%
GD	A	-1.54%
PG	A	-1.53%
ATO	A	-1.53%
PEP	A	-1.53%
ESS	A	-1.51%
CLX	D	-1.51%
ED	A	-1.51%
BRO	C	-1.51%
IBM	D	-1.51%
CINF	B	-1.51%
KO	A	-1.49%
NDSN	C	-1.48%
SYY	D	-1.47%
ABBV	D	-1.46%
FRT	A	-1.46%
TROW	D	-1.45%
CB	B	-1.44%
NUE	D	-1.43%
BDX	F	-1.42%
AFL	A	-1.41%
ROP	D	-1.4%
SWK	B	-1.39%
AMCR	A	-1.39%
ITW	D	-1.39%
O	A	-1.39%
BEN	F	-1.35%
ALB	D	-1.35%
MDT	C	-1.35%
KVUE	F	-1.34%
PPG	D	-1.32%
SPGI	C	-1.32%
MCD	D	-1.31%
APD	C	-1.3%
SJM	F	-1.3%
EXPD	D	-1.27%
CHRW	D	-1.18%