GVIP vs. ROM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM)

GVIP

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

GVIP Description

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$119.21

Average Daily Volume

5,628

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROM Description

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. TechnologySM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the technology sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, those involved in computers and office equipment, software, communications technology, semiconductors, diversified technology services and Internet services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$66.73

Average Daily Volume

58,600

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GVIP	ROM
30 Days	4.39%	4.40%
60 Days	8.65%	6.46%
90 Days	7.82%	-4.35%
12 Months	40.01%	71.53%

8 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GVIP	Weight in ROM	Overlap
AAPL	C	1.91%	3.67%	1.91%
ADBE	F	1.81%	1.8%	1.8%
AMD	C	2.1%	1.94%	1.94%
AVGO	C	2.07%	3.37%	2.07%
CRM	C	1.98%	2.0%	1.98%
MSFT	C	1.92%	16.35%	1.92%
NVDA	C	1.91%	14.42%	1.91%
WDC	C	2.02%	0.17%	0.17%

GVIP Overweight 40 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GEV	B	2.59%
LBRDK	C	2.3%
BABA	B	2.28%
SN	B	2.23%
APO	B	2.2%
CZR	C	2.19%
AMZN	C	2.13%
SPOT	C	2.12%
TDG	B	2.12%
GE	C	2.11%
KKR	B	2.09%
WDAY	D	2.07%
MELI	C	2.07%
HUBS	D	2.05%
NFLX	B	2.04%
PGR	C	2.04%
UBER	C	2.01%
THC	C	2.01%
META	B	2.0%
TSM	C	2.0%
ALIT	D	1.99%
IAC	C	1.99%
MA	B	1.98%
V	C	1.95%
NTRA	C	1.94%
AER	C	1.93%
BRK.A	C	1.93%
EDR	A	1.92%
HES	F	1.89%
GOOGL	D	1.89%
ET	C	1.89%
JPM	D	1.88%
HCP	A	1.87%
LLY	D	1.85%
UNH	C	1.85%
TEVA	D	1.84%
INSM	D	1.81%
FCNCA	D	1.73%
ACI	F	1.71%
X	F	1.67%

GVIP Underweight 58 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	B	-2.07%
ACN	C	-1.63%
CSCO	B	-1.62%
IBM	B	-1.54%
NOW	C	-1.48%
QCOM	D	-1.46%
TXN	B	-1.43%
INTU	D	-1.39%
AMAT	D	-1.23%
ADI	C	-0.87%
PANW	D	-0.85%
KLAC	D	-0.79%
MU	D	-0.78%
LRCX	D	-0.78%
ANET	C	-0.75%
INTC	D	-0.72%
APH	C	-0.61%
SNPS	F	-0.6%
MSI	B	-0.57%
CDNS	D	-0.57%
CRWD	D	-0.53%
NXPI	D	-0.46%
ROP	C	-0.46%
ADSK	B	-0.44%
FTNT	B	-0.38%
FICO	B	-0.37%
TEL	D	-0.35%
MPWR	B	-0.33%
MCHP	D	-0.32%
IT	C	-0.31%
CTSH	B	-0.29%
GLW	B	-0.26%
ON	D	-0.23%
HPQ	C	-0.23%
CDW	D	-0.23%
ANSS	D	-0.22%
KEYS	B	-0.21%
FSLR	C	-0.2%
HPE	C	-0.19%
TYL	C	-0.19%
NTAP	D	-0.19%
SMCI	F	-0.18%
GDDY	C	-0.17%
TER	C	-0.16%
STX	B	-0.16%
TDY	B	-0.16%
PTC	C	-0.16%
ZBRA	B	-0.15%
AKAM	D	-0.12%
ENPH	D	-0.12%
SWKS	F	-0.12%
VRSN	C	-0.12%
JBL	C	-0.11%
TRMB	C	-0.11%
JNPR	A	-0.1%
FFIV	B	-0.1%
EPAM	F	-0.09%
QRVO	F	-0.08%