EATZ vs. PSCT ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.39
Average Daily Volume
2,004
21
PSCT
PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio
PSCT Description
The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$49.73
Average Daily Volume
16,932
63
Performance
Period | EATZ | PSCT |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 9.34% | 6.44% |
60 Days | 10.97% | 6.42% |
90 Days | 13.58% | 3.39% |
12 Months | 41.91% | 15.36% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in PSCT | Overlap |
---|
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to PSCT
EATZ Underweight 63 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
SPSC | C | -4.3% | |
BMI | B | -4.12% | |
ACIW | B | -3.75% | |
MARA | C | -3.5% | |
ITRI | B | -3.41% | |
BOX | B | -3.23% | |
IDCC | A | -3.04% | |
PLXS | B | -2.79% | |
SANM | B | -2.77% | |
NSIT | F | -2.76% | |
AEIS | B | -2.72% | |
PI | D | -2.63% | |
SITM | B | -2.46% | |
DXC | B | -2.34% | |
SMTC | B | -2.26% | |
ENV | B | -2.08% | |
BL | B | -1.97% | |
FORM | D | -1.92% | |
ALRM | C | -1.92% | |
PRGS | A | -1.86% | |
AGYS | A | -1.79% | |
DV | C | -1.78% | |
KLIC | B | -1.66% | |
DIOD | D | -1.64% | |
OSIS | B | -1.59% | |
TTMI | B | -1.56% | |
YOU | D | -1.56% | |
ACLS | F | -1.55% | |
DOCN | D | -1.51% | |
VIAV | B | -1.43% | |
PLUS | F | -1.39% | |
VYX | B | -1.31% | |
EXTR | B | -1.31% | |
RAMP | C | -1.23% | |
ROG | D | -1.15% | |
CALX | D | -1.12% | |
BHE | B | -1.11% | |
CTS | C | -1.07% | |
KN | B | -1.04% | |
UCTT | D | -1.04% | |
NTCT | C | -1.02% | |
PLAB | C | -0.99% | |
VECO | F | -0.98% | |
HLIT | D | -0.91% | |
ATEN | B | -0.79% | |
COHU | C | -0.78% | |
ARLO | C | -0.74% | |
SCSC | B | -0.74% | |
DGII | B | -0.74% | |
MXL | C | -0.71% | |
ICHR | C | -0.67% | |
XRX | F | -0.63% | |
PDFS | C | -0.61% | |
CXM | C | -0.61% | |
WOLF | F | -0.58% | |
CNXN | C | -0.57% | |
AOSL | C | -0.48% | |
NABL | F | -0.47% | |
SWI | B | -0.46% | |
CEVA | B | -0.43% | |
SEDG | F | -0.41% | |
VSAT | F | -0.4% | |
CRSR | C | -0.19% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PSCT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords