CHIC vs. RPV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) to Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV)

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF

CHIC Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the NASDAQ OMX China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the technology sector in China. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$12.25

Average Daily Volume

3,430

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$83.53

Average Daily Volume

285,889

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CHIC	RPV
30 Days	4.12%	-5.55%
60 Days	-10.40%	0.96%
90 Days	-13.58%	3.15%
12 Months	-24.22%	13.28%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in CHIC	Weight in RPV	Overlap

CHIC Overweight 8 Positions Relative to RPV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BIDU	C	10.69%
BZ	A	3.47%
ATHM	D	2.98%
YY	B	2.79%
BILI	B	2.71%
IQ	A	2.6%
WB	B	2.14%
TME	A	0.04%

CHIC Underweight 95 Positions Relative to RPV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	A	-3.98%
BRK.A	C	-3.5%
F	D	-2.72%
UAL	B	-2.5%
TSN	A	-2.26%
VLO	B	-2.25%
VTRS	C	-2.23%
C	A	-2.05%
CVS	D	-2.02%
BG	B	-2.01%
KR	A	-1.97%
MHK	C	-1.97%
PARA	D	-1.96%
PSX	D	-1.81%
CNC	C	-1.8%
WBA	F	-1.77%
IVZ	D	-1.73%
CFG	A	-1.65%
WRK	A	-1.53%
CI	A	-1.5%
KMX	D	-1.45%
MCK	A	-1.41%
AAL	F	-1.36%
WBD	F	-1.35%
COF	A	-1.28%
HPE	C	-1.26%
BWA	B	-1.24%
CAH	C	-1.2%
NRG	A	-1.18%
TFC	A	-1.17%
ADM	D	-1.09%
BBY	D	-1.08%
LUV	F	-1.05%
KHC	A	-1.03%
SYF	A	-1.03%
WFC	A	-1.02%
IP	C	-1.01%
L	C	-1.01%
PRU	C	-1.0%
MOS	D	-0.99%
AIG	B	-0.98%
BAC	A	-0.94%
MTB	A	-0.94%
UHS	C	-0.94%
TAP	F	-0.92%
BK	A	-0.82%
HBAN	A	-0.82%
BEN	D	-0.77%
KEY	C	-0.77%
STT	C	-0.76%
RF	C	-0.75%
T	B	-0.71%
HIG	C	-0.67%
IFF	A	-0.66%
GS	A	-0.65%
MET	C	-0.64%
TGT	D	-0.63%
DOW	C	-0.63%
CMA	B	-0.61%
SWK	B	-0.59%
VZ	C	-0.59%
AIZ	C	-0.58%
ELV	A	-0.58%
CAG	A	-0.58%
ALL	A	-0.55%
FITB	A	-0.55%
EQT	A	-0.55%
EG	D	-0.54%
PNC	A	-0.54%
LYB	C	-0.54%
SYY	C	-0.53%
CINF	B	-0.53%
EMN	B	-0.53%
EVRG	A	-0.52%
CTVA	C	-0.52%
LKQ	F	-0.51%
FDX	B	-0.51%
HSIC	D	-0.5%
TRV	C	-0.5%
PFG	C	-0.5%
ARE	D	-0.5%
CVX	A	-0.49%
PNW	A	-0.49%
ES	A	-0.49%
KMI	A	-0.48%
USB	C	-0.48%
BIO	F	-0.45%
ALB	D	-0.45%
FOXA	B	-0.44%
HPQ	D	-0.42%
NWSA	D	-0.38%
CHRW	D	-0.38%
HUM	F	-0.33%
FOX	B	-0.22%
NWS	D	-0.12%