XMVM vs. PYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) to PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ)

XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

XMVM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to track the performance of approximately 80 stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® that have the highest “value” and “momentum” scores.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.48

Average Daily Volume

14,279

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.36

Average Daily Volume

2,690

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMVM	PYZ
30 Days	-2.84%	-3.58%
60 Days	2.58%	1.78%
90 Days	3.57%	6.54%
12 Months	26.21%	11.19%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMVM	Weight in PYZ	Overlap
CLF	D	1.57%	2.04%	1.57%
CMC	D	1.78%	1.7%	1.7%
RS	D	0.98%	4.4%	0.98%
VVV	C	1.02%	1.87%	1.02%
WLK	B	0.98%	2.45%	0.98%

XMVM Overweight 73 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	A	3.73%
DINO	C	2.5%
AVT	A	2.47%
ARW	A	2.23%
SNX	A	2.12%
AN	A	2.11%
X	F	2.05%
TMHC	C	2.01%
CNX	A	2.01%
LAD	D	1.93%
SWN	A	1.88%
UNM	B	1.81%
TOL	C	1.71%
KBH	C	1.67%
AMG	C	1.57%
MDU	A	1.5%
PFGC	D	1.47%
THC	C	1.44%
VST	A	1.42%
ADNT	D	1.41%
R	A	1.41%
TEX	B	1.4%
USFD	C	1.39%
RGA	A	1.37%
PAG	C	1.35%
CHRD	A	1.35%
ARMK	A	1.32%
CIVI	A	1.31%
PPC	A	1.31%
MTG	C	1.3%
GT	F	1.27%
LEA	D	1.26%
TCBI	D	1.25%
PR	A	1.23%
AGCO	B	1.22%
JEF	B	1.21%
ESNT	C	1.19%
OSK	A	1.18%
JHG	C	1.18%
THO	D	1.18%
MUR	A	1.15%
RRC	A	1.14%
RNR	C	1.13%
GEF	D	1.06%
MTDR	A	1.05%
VSH	C	1.03%
ORI	A	1.03%
SF	A	0.98%
BDC	D	0.97%
MUSA	A	0.97%
PVH	C	0.97%
FLR	A	0.96%
KEX	A	0.94%
INGR	B	0.94%
OC	A	0.9%
TKR	B	0.89%
ALE	A	0.88%
AMKR	C	0.84%
BC	D	0.84%
KD	C	0.83%
BERY	D	0.8%
UFPI	D	0.8%
NWE	A	0.8%
WERN	F	0.77%
ENS	D	0.74%
CRI	D	0.74%
KNX	F	0.74%
VOYA	D	0.73%
FAF	D	0.73%
CNO	C	0.68%
SAIC	C	0.67%
HELE	F	0.64%
NYCB	F	0.52%

XMVM Underweight 45 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
STLD	B	-4.6%
AVY	B	-4.13%
NUE	D	-4.09%
LYB	C	-3.72%
LIN	C	-3.67%
APD	D	-3.2%
ATI	A	-2.77%
RPM	D	-2.34%
LPX	C	-2.31%
FCX	A	-2.26%
SLVM	A	-2.13%
CTVA	C	-2.08%
WOR	D	-2.07%
CE	D	-2.06%
DOW	C	-2.02%
CRS	A	-2.02%
SUM	C	-1.99%
CBT	A	-1.98%
ECL	C	-1.93%
OLN	D	-1.88%
IFF	A	-1.83%
UEC	B	-1.8%
SMG	B	-1.78%
IP	D	-1.74%
FMC	D	-1.65%
CF	C	-1.64%
KWR	D	-1.64%
CENX	A	-1.6%
ESI	C	-1.51%
NEU	D	-1.49%
HWKN	A	-1.41%
HUN	D	-1.32%
OI	F	-1.3%
FUL	D	-1.28%
SXC	C	-1.27%
CC	C	-1.24%
MATV	A	-1.22%
MTRN	D	-1.2%
IOSP	C	-1.18%
AVNT	A	-1.15%
KALU	A	-1.07%
PCT	F	-1.04%
MTX	C	-0.96%
SCL	D	-0.91%
BCPC	D	-0.89%