XMHQ vs. BUYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.30

Average Daily Volume

310,804

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

BUYZ

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF

BUYZ Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of disruptive commerce. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the fund concentrates its investments in consumer discretionary related industries. It is non-diversified. Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies benefitting from transformation in the e-commerce space. Provides access to companies that are related to new online markets, streamlined procurement systems, and game-changing ways to deliver goods and services

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.75

Average Daily Volume

5,302

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	BUYZ
30 Days	3.12%	6.92%
60 Days	3.51%	11.09%
90 Days	3.55%	14.70%
12 Months	28.09%	39.65%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in BUYZ	Overlap
	MANH	D	4.08%	2.84%	2.84%

XMHQ Overweight 75 Positions Relative to BUYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSL	C	3.86%
EME	A	3.81%
WSM	C	3.43%
FIX	A	2.48%
THC	D	2.39%
RS	B	2.38%
RNR	C	2.28%
OC	A	2.16%
LECO	C	2.08%
GGG	B	2.05%
TOL	B	2.03%
PSTG	D	1.86%
CW	C	1.83%
KNSL	B	1.8%
DT	D	1.66%
MEDP	D	1.62%
BLD	D	1.59%
DKS	D	1.57%
EXP	B	1.45%
CR	A	1.44%
MUSA	B	1.43%
AYI	B	1.43%
AIT	B	1.4%
CVLT	B	1.38%
PRI	B	1.35%
WMS	F	1.34%
INGR	C	1.32%
AFG	A	1.3%
RGLD	C	1.3%
CHE	D	1.3%
TREX	C	1.3%
SEIC	B	1.28%
PCTY	C	1.22%
UFPI	C	1.21%
CNM	D	1.2%
CELH	F	1.13%
LSTR	D	1.13%
DCI	B	1.12%
RLI	A	1.1%
LSCC	D	1.09%
SAIC	F	1.03%
CROX	D	1.02%
SSD	F	1.01%
WFRD	D	0.96%
QLYS	B	0.94%
LNTH	D	0.94%
G	B	0.94%
ELF	C	0.93%
VNT	C	0.91%
COKE	C	0.9%
ROIV	C	0.9%
CHX	C	0.88%
DINO	D	0.87%
KBH	D	0.85%
MSA	F	0.84%
CBT	D	0.82%
MTG	C	0.81%
VVV	D	0.8%
ESNT	F	0.74%
EXPO	D	0.74%
CRUS	D	0.66%
MSM	C	0.66%
LOPE	C	0.64%
NEU	D	0.6%
LANC	C	0.52%
FHI	B	0.51%
IBOC	B	0.49%
ENS	F	0.49%
TEX	F	0.48%
SAM	C	0.48%
YETI	D	0.48%
NSP	F	0.47%
VC	F	0.39%
CXT	C	0.35%
CRI	F	0.32%

XMHQ Underweight 57 Positions Relative to BUYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMZN	C	-8.95%
SHOP	B	-7.2%
DASH	B	-6.35%
COST	A	-5.59%
GWW	B	-5.12%
BKNG	A	-4.44%
MELI	C	-4.38%
UBER	F	-3.86%
MA	B	-3.25%
V	A	-2.96%
NFLX	A	-2.76%
FAST	B	-2.44%
MMYT	B	-2.2%
META	D	-2.12%
CPRT	B	-1.98%
APP	B	-1.51%
XPO	B	-1.4%
TTD	B	-1.28%
FRPT	A	-1.21%
GLBE	B	-1.2%
PDD	F	-1.18%
BABA	D	-1.14%
PKG	A	-1.11%
GOOGL	C	-0.99%
ABNB	C	-0.96%
EXPE	B	-0.94%
EBAY	D	-0.81%
SPSC	D	-0.62%
JKHY	D	-0.61%
SE	A	-0.56%
WIX	A	-0.53%
PYPL	B	-0.51%
SPOT	B	-0.51%
GDDY	A	-0.51%
TOST	B	-0.51%
LQDT	B	-0.5%
RBLX	C	-0.5%
CVNA	B	-0.49%
ADSK	A	-0.49%
CPNG	D	-0.49%
TRU	D	-0.48%
GPK	C	-0.42%
AFRM	A	-0.3%
HUBS	A	-0.26%
CHWY	B	-0.26%
RBA	A	-0.25%
LYFT	C	-0.25%
PLD	F	-0.24%
DESP	B	-0.24%
FOUR	A	-0.24%
ODFL	C	-0.24%
SQ	A	-0.23%
DUOL	A	-0.23%
RVLV	A	-0.21%
FICO	B	-0.19%
ETSY	D	-0.19%
CSGP	D	-0.17%