VNMC vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
VNMC

Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF

VNMC Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in companies that, at the time of purchase, have market capitalizations either within the capitalization range of the Russell Midcap® Value Index or of $15 billion or less. The Russell Midcap® Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of companies with lower price to book ratios and lower forecasted growth values within the broader Russell Midcap Index®. It may invest up tp 20% of its assets in companies with smaller or larger capitalizations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.26

Average Daily Volume

397

Number of Holdings *

56

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$110.15

Average Daily Volume

19,707

Number of Holdings *

88

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period VNMC RFV
30 Days -5.86% -6.94%
60 Days -3.66% -1.91%
90 Days 4.39% -1.46%
12 Months 19.19% 21.57%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in VNMC Weight in RFV Overlap
KMPR B 1.71% 1.19% 1.19%
PFGC D 1.48% 1.62% 1.48%
RGA A 2.08% 1.12% 1.12%
ZION A 1.2% 0.88% 0.88%
VNMC Overweight 52 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
DASH D 3.78%
FTI B 3.65%
CSTM D 3.47%
FANG B 3.22%
MPWR C 3.02%
NDAQ B 3.0%
RCL A 2.91%
IQV D 2.88%
ALL A 2.65%
VMC C 2.59%
MRVL D 2.43%
CACI A 2.33%
CTVA D 2.25%
TYL A 2.22%
MSCI F 2.18%
APO C 2.05%
NVT B 1.95%
EXR C 1.81%
SAIA F 1.77%
FLS A 1.73%
AVY B 1.72%
RRC B 1.68%
CDW D 1.67%
SKX A 1.66%
EGP F 1.66%
KOS F 1.65%
AXON B 1.56%
ALLE D 1.45%
A C 1.44%
AZEK C 1.44%
AVTR C 1.42%
RJF B 1.37%
BRKR D 1.33%
ARES B 1.28%
CMA B 1.19%
WAL C 1.13%
MDB D 1.11%
HUBB D 1.09%
AAON A 1.04%
EFX D 1.0%
MSI B 0.94%
VRT A 0.85%
LULU F 0.81%
AME C 0.76%
VST A 0.76%
ON D 0.7%
ULTA F 0.69%
FND D 0.69%
SITE F 0.69%
AZO D 0.69%
OTIS D 0.47%
AJG C 0.42%
VNMC Underweight 84 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
PBF B -3.52%
M D -2.7%
SNX A -2.56%
AVT A -2.5%
X F -2.28%
DINO D -2.24%
ARW B -2.2%
LAD F -2.01%
GT D -1.96%
MAN B -1.83%
CLF F -1.81%
AN A -1.79%
JWN B -1.75%
MTZ A -1.71%
USFD C -1.71%
AA B -1.7%
ADNT D -1.7%
JLL C -1.67%
HTZ F -1.58%
UNM A -1.56%
GHC C -1.53%
PPC A -1.51%
ALLY B -1.47%
TMHC C -1.47%
WCC F -1.42%
THC A -1.41%
LEA F -1.35%
ARMK B -1.33%
MDU A -1.31%
R A -1.23%
ASB A -1.2%
PVH D -1.17%
WHR F -1.15%
CMC D -1.15%
PAG D -1.14%
JEF B -1.09%
KD C -1.08%
HOG F -1.01%
PRGO A -1.01%
THO F -1.01%
FNB B -0.97%
CUZ B -0.96%
FLR A -0.95%
VAC B -0.92%
KRC F -0.91%
POST A -0.85%
UGI A -0.84%
FYBR C -0.83%
ENOV D -0.82%
VLY F -0.82%
FHN A -0.82%
CHK B -0.78%
AR A -0.76%
PENN F -0.74%
ONB A -0.72%
TGNA D -0.69%
JHG C -0.68%
GPS D -0.68%
OSK B -0.67%
PB A -0.67%
GEF D -0.67%
SWX A -0.67%
TCBI D -0.65%
AGCO D -0.63%
COHR C -0.63%
IRT A -0.62%
NVST F -0.58%
BJ A -0.58%
WBS D -0.57%
BKH A -0.55%
CNO B -0.54%
ORI A -0.54%
NOV D -0.52%
VSH C -0.5%
FAF D -0.49%
WERN D -0.48%
SR A -0.47%
BERY D -0.45%
KNX F -0.44%
NYCB F -0.39%
LEG F -0.35%
CNXC F -0.34%
UAA F -0.32%
UA F -0.32%
Compare ETFs