TOLZ vs. FBCV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) to Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV)

TOLZ

ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF

TOLZ Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index (the "index"). The index consists of companies domiciled globally that qualify as "pure-play" infrastructure companies-companies whose primary business is the ownership and operation of infrastructure assets, activities that generally generate long-term stable cash flows. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.29

Average Daily Volume

28,788

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FBCV

Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF

FBCV Description

The investment seeks long-term growth of capital. Normally the fund invests at least 80% of assets in blue chip companies (companies that, in Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC's (FMR) view, are well-known, well-established and well-capitalized), which generally have large or medium market capitalizations. It invests in companies that manager believes are undervalued in the marketplace in relation to factors such as assets, sales, earnings, growth potential, or cash flow, or in relation to securities of other companies in the same industry (stocks of these companies are often called "value" stocks). The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.81

Average Daily Volume

11,160

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TOLZ	FBCV
30 Days	3.38%	3.52%
60 Days	3.03%	4.01%
90 Days	6.49%	5.93%
12 Months	23.09%	22.34%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TOLZ	Weight in FBCV	Overlap
CCI	D	2.42%	0.76%	0.76%
EIX	B	1.73%	1.5%	1.5%
PCG	A	2.4%	2.45%	2.4%
SRE	A	3.14%	0.83%	0.83%

TOLZ Overweight 45 Positions Relative to FBCV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMT	D	4.95%
WMB	A	3.76%
OKE	A	3.5%
ET	A	2.89%
KMI	A	2.86%
LNG	B	2.59%
EPD	A	2.44%
TRGP	B	2.32%
EXC	C	2.09%
ED	D	1.77%
AWK	D	1.42%
SBAC	D	1.27%
ATO	A	1.21%
ES	D	1.18%
CNP	B	1.08%
MPLX	A	0.95%
NI	A	0.88%
PAC	B	0.6%
SBS	B	0.6%
DTM	B	0.53%
WTRG	B	0.52%
PAA	B	0.43%
WES	C	0.39%
ASR	D	0.36%
AM	A	0.28%
SWX	B	0.25%
NJR	A	0.25%
OGS	A	0.24%
SR	A	0.21%
ENLC	A	0.21%
HESM	B	0.2%
PAGP	A	0.19%
OMAB	D	0.18%
NWE	B	0.18%
AWR	B	0.17%
CWT	D	0.16%
CPK	A	0.15%
CQP	B	0.11%
NWN	A	0.09%
SJW	D	0.09%
GEL	D	0.07%
NFE	D	0.05%
UTL	B	0.05%
CAAP	C	0.04%
CWCO	C	0.02%

TOLZ Underweight 80 Positions Relative to FBCV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
XOM	B	-4.38%
JPM	A	-3.47%
CMCSA	B	-2.85%
UNH	C	-2.81%
TRV	B	-2.81%
CI	F	-2.77%
BRK.A	B	-2.65%
DIS	B	-2.37%
BAC	A	-2.36%
CSCO	B	-2.17%
CNC	D	-2.14%
BLK	C	-2.06%
DE	A	-2.03%
KVUE	A	-1.98%
AZN	D	-1.83%
JNJ	D	-1.78%
CB	C	-1.75%
BMY	B	-1.7%
HRB	D	-1.7%
WFC	A	-1.64%
KO	D	-1.38%
NOC	D	-1.38%
ELV	F	-1.36%
CTSH	B	-1.35%
GEN	B	-1.35%
PNC	B	-1.33%
CVS	D	-1.27%
PG	A	-1.26%
LMT	D	-1.24%
WTW	B	-1.23%
KDP	D	-1.2%
GILD	C	-1.13%
DOX	D	-1.13%
NGG	D	-1.11%
PNR	A	-1.1%
LOW	D	-1.06%
USFD	A	-1.0%
CF	B	-0.99%
HLN	D	-0.98%
ROST	C	-0.97%
MTB	A	-0.96%
FDX	B	-0.91%
USB	A	-0.87%
MRK	F	-0.87%
NTRS	A	-0.86%
APO	B	-0.77%
JCI	C	-0.76%
CCEP	C	-0.74%
MDLZ	F	-0.74%
CCK	C	-0.73%
TSN	B	-0.72%
RRX	B	-0.69%
NEE	D	-0.67%
EQNR	D	-0.66%
LHX	C	-0.64%
BJ	A	-0.63%
DEO	F	-0.62%
MMS	F	-0.59%
AES	F	-0.56%
MU	D	-0.5%
OXY	D	-0.49%
SPG	B	-0.45%
CMI	A	-0.41%
MUSA	A	-0.39%
SO	D	-0.38%
CHRW	C	-0.38%
G	B	-0.32%
TPR	B	-0.31%
ALSN	B	-0.3%
SNY	F	-0.3%
OVV	B	-0.28%
OTEX	D	-0.28%
GEV	B	-0.26%
BNTX	D	-0.26%
CFR	B	-0.21%
OSK	B	-0.16%
NXPI	D	-0.15%
AVGO	D	-0.14%
AR	B	-0.12%
ULTA	F	-0.1%