TDV vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

TDV

ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF

TDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$69.37

Average Daily Volume

23,727

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.53

Average Daily Volume

21,798

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TDV	RFV
30 Days	-2.14%	-2.97%
60 Days	-1.92%	1.22%
90 Days	-1.11%	-0.04%
12 Months	18.69%	25.20%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in TDV	Weight in RFV	Overlap
	AVT	A	2.81%	2.5%	2.5%

TDV Overweight 34 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
APH	A	3.29%
LRCX	D	3.16%
ORCL	D	3.11%
QCOM	B	3.1%
TEL	D	3.07%
IBM	C	3.06%
CASS	D	3.06%
KLAC	D	3.05%
AVGO	D	3.04%
MSI	A	3.03%
MA	C	3.02%
CDW	C	3.01%
MSFT	D	3.0%
CGNX	F	2.96%
GLW	C	2.92%
V	C	2.9%
BMI	A	2.84%
JKHY	D	2.82%
SSNC	C	2.82%
INTU	C	2.81%
ROP	C	2.77%
ADI	B	2.77%
TXN	B	2.74%
HPQ	D	2.74%
BR	D	2.71%
MCHP	B	2.71%
LFUS	D	2.69%
CSCO	D	2.68%
DLB	D	2.64%
SWKS	D	2.62%
CSGS	D	2.62%
AAPL	F	2.5%
ACN	F	2.47%
POWI	D	2.3%

TDV Underweight 87 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	B	-3.52%
M	D	-2.7%
SNX	A	-2.56%
X	F	-2.28%
DINO	D	-2.24%
ARW	A	-2.2%
LAD	F	-2.01%
GT	F	-1.96%
MAN	B	-1.83%
CLF	D	-1.81%
AN	A	-1.79%
JWN	B	-1.75%
MTZ	B	-1.71%
USFD	C	-1.71%
AA	A	-1.7%
ADNT	D	-1.7%
JLL	C	-1.67%
PFGC	C	-1.62%
HTZ	F	-1.58%
UNM	B	-1.56%
GHC	C	-1.53%
PPC	A	-1.51%
ALLY	A	-1.47%
TMHC	C	-1.47%
WCC	B	-1.42%
THC	B	-1.41%
LEA	D	-1.35%
ARMK	A	-1.33%
MDU	A	-1.31%
R	A	-1.23%
ASB	B	-1.2%
KMPR	B	-1.19%
PVH	C	-1.17%
WHR	F	-1.15%
CMC	B	-1.15%
PAG	C	-1.14%
RGA	A	-1.12%
JEF	B	-1.09%
KD	C	-1.08%
HOG	C	-1.01%
PRGO	C	-1.01%
THO	D	-1.01%
FNB	B	-0.97%
CUZ	B	-0.96%
FLR	A	-0.95%
VAC	A	-0.92%
KRC	D	-0.91%
ZION	B	-0.88%
POST	A	-0.85%
UGI	A	-0.84%
FYBR	D	-0.83%
ENOV	D	-0.82%
VLY	C	-0.82%
FHN	B	-0.82%
CHK	A	-0.78%
AR	A	-0.76%
PENN	D	-0.74%
ONB	B	-0.72%
TGNA	F	-0.69%
JHG	C	-0.68%
GPS	D	-0.68%
OSK	A	-0.67%
PB	B	-0.67%
GEF	D	-0.67%
SWX	A	-0.67%
TCBI	B	-0.65%
AGCO	B	-0.63%
COHR	D	-0.63%
IRT	B	-0.62%
NVST	D	-0.58%
BJ	A	-0.58%
WBS	D	-0.57%
BKH	A	-0.55%
CNO	B	-0.54%
ORI	A	-0.54%
NOV	B	-0.52%
VSH	C	-0.5%
FAF	C	-0.49%
WERN	F	-0.48%
SR	A	-0.47%
BERY	D	-0.45%
KNX	F	-0.44%
NYCB	F	-0.39%
LEG	D	-0.35%
CNXC	F	-0.34%
UAA	D	-0.32%
UA	D	-0.32%