SIXG vs. PSL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (SIXG) to PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples (PSL)

SIXG

Defiance Connective Technologies ETF

SIXG Description

The fund uses a passive management approach to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the index. The index is a rules-based index that consists of a tiered, modified market capitalization-weighted portfolio of the U.S.-listed equity securities, including depositary receipts, of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of 5G networking and communication technologies (collectively, "5G Companies").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.30

Average Daily Volume

18,550

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSL

PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples

PSL Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Consumer Staples Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US consumer staples companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the businesses of providing consumer goods and services that have non-cyclical characteristics, including tobacco, textiles, food and beverage, and non-discretionary retail. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$104.35

Average Daily Volume

3,102

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SIXG	PSL
30 Days	-1.25%	2.29%
60 Days	5.83%	2.96%
90 Days	6.99%	5.16%
12 Months		26.48%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in SIXG	Weight in PSL	Overlap

SIXG Overweight 49 Positions Relative to PSL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	5.6%
AVGO	C	5.15%
ORCL	A	5.12%
AAPL	C	4.52%
CSCO	B	4.01%
QCOM	F	3.37%
ANET	C	2.72%
CRDO	C	2.54%
MRVL	B	2.43%
GSAT	B	2.26%
DDOG	B	1.97%
IDCC	A	1.94%
MTSI	B	1.93%
CIEN	B	1.93%
ERIC	B	1.83%
KEYS	C	1.81%
NOK	B	1.77%
VIAV	B	1.75%
FFIV	B	1.74%
KD	A	1.73%
ATEN	A	1.71%
CSGS	A	1.69%
NTAP	D	1.69%
EXTR	B	1.68%
ARM	F	1.65%
NTCT	B	1.6%
DOX	D	1.59%
TMUS	A	1.58%
MXL	C	1.56%
DT	C	1.56%
SWI	B	1.53%
IRDM	C	1.52%
JNPR	D	1.49%
HCP	B	1.44%
INFN	C	1.42%
EQIX	B	1.41%
AKAM	F	1.4%
T	A	1.39%
DOCN	D	1.35%
SWKS	F	1.34%
CALX	F	1.32%
NABL	F	1.26%
COMM	D	1.26%
VZ	C	1.23%
CCI	D	1.17%
NPAB	F	1.12%
AMT	D	1.12%
QRVO	F	0.96%
VSAT	F	0.83%

SIXG Underweight 42 Positions Relative to PSL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SFM	A	-4.04%
CHD	A	-3.4%
MO	A	-3.37%
CASY	B	-3.34%
SCI	B	-3.31%
COST	B	-3.29%
FRPT	B	-3.26%
MNST	D	-3.2%
KR	B	-3.0%
USFD	B	-2.96%
PG	C	-2.89%
ATGE	B	-2.86%
BRBR	A	-2.73%
KDP	D	-2.67%
LRN	A	-2.66%
HRB	D	-2.64%
BJ	B	-2.63%
PM	A	-2.58%
CALM	A	-2.57%
PEP	F	-2.38%
COKE	C	-2.32%
PFGC	B	-2.16%
INGR	B	-2.11%
LAUR	A	-2.06%
SPB	C	-2.02%
SYY	D	-1.99%
MDLZ	F	-1.96%
TAP	A	-1.95%
LOPE	B	-1.94%
UNFI	A	-1.92%
HSY	F	-1.81%
VITL	F	-1.81%
POST	D	-1.8%
BFAM	F	-1.77%
STZ	D	-1.7%
WDFC	A	-1.65%
PRDO	B	-1.64%
IPAR	C	-1.62%
STRA	C	-1.52%
CHEF	B	-1.5%
HAIN	F	-1.41%
KLG	F	-1.39%