SIMS vs. GCOW ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW)
SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

SIMS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Intelligent Infrastructure sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.93

Average Daily Volume

4,671

Number of Holdings *

43

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GCOW

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF

GCOW Description The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in the components of the index and investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of such component securities (e.g., depositary receipts). The index uses an objective, rules-based methodology to provide exposure to global companies with high dividend yields backed by a high free cash flow yield. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.39

Average Daily Volume

305,407

Number of Holdings *

36

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SIMS GCOW
30 Days -4.63% -0.78%
60 Days -2.48% 1.90%
90 Days 1.83% 1.45%
12 Months 3.58% 3.79%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SIMS Weight in GCOW Overlap
BP A 1.88% 1.92% 1.88%
SIMS Overweight 42 Positions Relative to GCOW
Symbol Grade Weight
AYI C 3.54%
ITRI A 3.42%
PSN C 3.29%
XYL A 3.15%
PNR C 3.15%
JCI A 3.06%
TTEK A 3.04%
ALRM C 3.03%
REZI C 3.02%
SLAB D 2.89%
GNRC A 2.8%
CARR A 2.71%
BMI A 2.69%
ADTN F 2.65%
HON C 2.55%
CNM A 2.51%
DOOR A 2.46%
AY A 2.33%
QCOM B 2.15%
EMR C 2.13%
GTLS B 2.07%
BLNK F 2.03%
ERII F 2.0%
AME D 1.94%
MWA A 1.93%
TEL D 1.84%
BE D 1.82%
CHPT F 1.81%
ROP D 1.68%
SHLS F 1.61%
LOGI D 1.56%
NVEE D 1.54%
ON D 1.49%
STM D 1.45%
BIDU D 1.42%
STEM F 1.34%
ROKU F 0.96%
CWCO D 0.94%
MVIS F 0.57%
REKR F 0.5%
WBX D 0.25%
LUNA F 0.12%
SIMS Underweight 35 Positions Relative to GCOW
Symbol Grade Weight
XOM B -2.26%
IBM D -2.24%
ABBV D -2.22%
COP A -2.2%
F B -2.19%
CVX A -2.11%
TTE A -2.1%
VZ D -2.02%
STLA C -1.99%
NVS B -1.88%
T C -1.88%
MO A -1.87%
PM A -1.86%
RIO A -1.82%
UPS D -1.81%
BHP D -1.81%
SNY C -1.8%
BTI D -1.75%
PFE F -1.74%
BMY F -1.71%
PXD B -1.7%
UL B -1.7%
SCCO A -1.54%
WDS F -1.53%
EOG A -1.4%
GILD F -1.24%
CVS F -1.21%
GSK C -1.19%
E A -1.17%
MMM A -1.16%
VOD D -0.9%
WMB A -0.84%
KHC A -0.77%
KMB A -0.61%
SOLV B -0.2%
Compare ETFs