RNEW vs. PSCD ETF Comparison

Comparison of VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (PSCD)

RNEW

VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF

RNEW Description

The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities of Green Infrastructure Companies. The index is a U.S. index that tracks the performance of Green Infrastructure Companies. "Green Infrastructure Companies" are companies that seek to positively impact the environment through the production, transmission, or distribution of green energy and/or through the establishment of sustainable infrastructure to facilitate the use of green energy. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.29

Average Daily Volume

132

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCD

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio

PSCD Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Consumer Discretionary Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US consumer discretionary companies. These companies are principally engaged in providing consumer goods and services that are cyclical in nature, including retail, automotive, leisure and recreation, media and real estate. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$110.55

Average Daily Volume

604

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RNEW	PSCD
30 Days	4.52%	4.52%
60 Days	1.13%	0.66%
90 Days	-0.95%	1.98%
12 Months	12.92%	25.24%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RNEW	Weight in PSCD	Overlap

RNEW Overweight 39 Positions Relative to PSCD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	9.84%
LNG	A	6.99%
PWR	A	6.12%
RSG	A	5.75%
CLH	C	5.66%
WM	B	5.6%
ECL	D	5.24%
DCI	B	4.9%
RIVN	F	4.4%
BWA	D	4.19%
FSLR	F	3.35%
CWST	A	3.29%
IDA	A	3.21%
SWX	B	2.97%
ITRI	C	2.83%
BE	B	2.77%
LCID	F	2.64%
ORA	B	2.56%
ENPH	F	2.39%
NWE	B	1.82%
CWEN	C	1.22%
RUN	F	1.19%
NFE	D	0.98%
NEP	F	0.8%
PLUG	F	0.79%
SPH	C	0.61%
ARRY	F	0.52%
AMRC	F	0.49%
ERII	D	0.45%
REX	D	0.43%
SHLS	F	0.39%
GPRE	F	0.37%
AMPS	C	0.33%
CLNE	F	0.32%
MEG	F	0.32%
MNTK	F	0.31%
CHPT	F	0.25%
NOVA	F	0.24%
SES	F	0.05%

RNEW Underweight 81 Positions Relative to PSCD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BBWI	C	-3.59%
VFC	C	-3.4%
MTH	D	-3.33%
ETSY	D	-2.91%
GPI	B	-2.77%
EAT	A	-2.67%
ABG	C	-2.63%
SHAK	C	-2.48%
IBP	D	-2.38%
KTB	B	-2.31%
SIG	B	-2.21%
MHO	D	-2.18%
LRN	A	-2.18%
FTDR	B	-2.14%
BOOT	C	-2.1%
TPH	D	-2.0%
CVCO	A	-1.96%
NWL	C	-1.87%
DORM	B	-1.87%
ASO	F	-1.76%
ATGE	B	-1.68%
AEO	F	-1.68%
SHOO	F	-1.6%
PENN	C	-1.59%
LCII	C	-1.49%
HBI	B	-1.48%
VSCO	C	-1.47%
PATK	C	-1.47%
VSTO	A	-1.32%
CCS	D	-1.21%
STRA	C	-1.19%
PHIN	A	-1.17%
AAP	D	-1.15%
CAKE	C	-1.15%
URBN	C	-1.11%
LGIH	F	-1.1%
GRBK	D	-1.09%
KSS	F	-1.02%
FL	F	-0.99%
LZB	B	-0.92%
WGO	C	-0.9%
ADNT	F	-0.89%
WWW	A	-0.89%
PRDO	B	-0.83%
SONO	C	-0.81%
LEG	F	-0.81%
PZZA	F	-0.79%
UPBD	B	-0.79%
HELE	C	-0.75%
SABR	C	-0.74%
BKE	B	-0.73%
SBH	C	-0.7%
THRM	F	-0.68%
FOXF	F	-0.68%
WOR	F	-0.63%
MODG	F	-0.62%
GIII	D	-0.61%
PLAY	D	-0.61%
OXM	F	-0.57%
CAL	F	-0.55%
CBRL	C	-0.55%
MCRI	A	-0.54%
DAN	D	-0.53%
XPEL	B	-0.52%
BLMN	F	-0.51%
SAH	C	-0.48%
JACK	C	-0.44%
EYE	C	-0.44%
MNRO	D	-0.44%
ODP	F	-0.43%
BJRI	C	-0.42%
MCW	C	-0.38%
AXL	C	-0.38%
GDEN	B	-0.36%
SMP	C	-0.35%
RGR	F	-0.33%
ETD	C	-0.33%
SCVL	F	-0.32%
HZO	F	-0.29%
LESL	D	-0.28%
GES	F	-0.24%