RFV vs. WDNA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$117.46

Average Daily Volume

11,502

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WDNA

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund

WDNA Description

The investment seeks to track the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index (?index?). The fund generally uses a representative sampling strategy to achieve its investment objective, meaning it generally will invest in a sample of the securities in the index whose risk, return and other characteristics resemble the risk, return and other characteristics of the Index as a whole. The index is designed to provide exposure to equity securities of exchange listed companies globally that will be significantly transformed by advancements in genetics and biotechnology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.19

Average Daily Volume

1,104

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	WDNA
30 Days	3.19%	-1.37%
60 Days	8.13%	2.75%
90 Days	7.09%	2.87%
12 Months	25.06%	10.39%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in WDNA	Overlap
	BIO	B	0.58%	0.86%	0.58%

RFV Overweight 83 Positions Relative to WDNA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVT	B	2.76%
SNX	C	2.55%
JLL	C	2.44%
MTZ	A	2.41%
THC	D	2.36%
LAD	C	2.34%
ARW	C	2.31%
M	D	2.11%
USFD	C	2.05%
X	F	2.04%
JWN	D	2.01%
AN	D	1.98%
PBF	F	1.88%
TMHC	C	1.77%
PFGC	A	1.77%
AA	B	1.76%
PPC	C	1.74%
MAN	D	1.71%
GHC	A	1.71%
DINO	F	1.7%
UNM	A	1.69%
AAL	D	1.64%
R	C	1.57%
ARMK	C	1.53%
WCC	D	1.51%
JEF	A	1.47%
MDU	C	1.43%
GT	F	1.33%
FYBR	C	1.31%
RGA	B	1.25%
ALLY	F	1.24%
CUZ	C	1.22%
KMPR	D	1.2%
KD	D	1.2%
PAG	D	1.19%
ASB	D	1.18%
WHR	C	1.12%
FLR	B	1.1%
CMC	D	1.1%
COHR	B	1.09%
LEA	F	1.07%
CLF	D	1.06%
THO	C	1.05%
KRC	C	1.02%
PVH	D	1.0%
FNB	D	0.97%
HOG	D	0.95%
ZION	D	0.95%
POST	C	0.91%
VLY	C	0.88%
CNH	C	0.86%
PRGO	F	0.83%
FHN	D	0.81%
JHG	A	0.8%
UGI	C	0.78%
ONB	D	0.78%
IRT	D	0.77%
TCBI	B	0.75%
PB	D	0.74%
VAC	D	0.68%
CHK	C	0.68%
AR	C	0.67%
CNO	B	0.67%
GEF	B	0.66%
GAP	F	0.66%
SWX	C	0.64%
BJ	B	0.62%
ORI	A	0.61%
ENOV	F	0.61%
BKH	C	0.59%
FAF	C	0.54%
WBS	D	0.54%
NVST	D	0.53%
OSK	F	0.53%
BERY	C	0.52%
SR	D	0.49%
AGCO	D	0.49%
KNX	D	0.47%
NOV	F	0.43%
VSH	F	0.42%
UAA	B	0.41%
UA	B	0.39%
CNXC	F	0.31%

RFV Underweight 72 Positions Relative to WDNA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TWST	D	-3.6%
NTRA	A	-2.74%
LLY	D	-2.47%
GERN	D	-2.47%
AGIO	D	-2.46%
BPMC	F	-2.17%
VCEL	F	-1.86%
VCYT	C	-1.78%
IOVA	D	-1.75%
UTHR	C	-1.64%
ALNY	C	-1.59%
RARE	D	-1.59%
VRTX	D	-1.52%
SRPT	F	-1.51%
BBIO	F	-1.5%
DHR	D	-1.48%
FATE	F	-1.47%
REGN	D	-1.43%
CTLT	A	-1.42%
DD	C	-1.42%
NVS	D	-1.41%
MYGN	D	-1.41%
AMGN	D	-1.39%
ZTS	C	-1.27%
FOLD	F	-1.25%
TMO	D	-1.25%
EXAS	C	-1.22%
A	B	-1.21%
IONS	F	-1.2%
AZN	D	-1.17%
TSN	D	-1.16%
DOW	B	-1.16%
JNJ	D	-1.14%
MRK	F	-1.13%
GILD	A	-1.13%
QGEN	F	-1.13%
BNTX	B	-1.12%
CTVA	A	-1.1%
STOK	D	-1.1%
CRSP	F	-1.1%
BEAM	F	-1.09%
NEO	F	-1.08%
DAR	F	-1.05%
BMY	A	-1.02%
ILMN	B	-1.02%
TECH	D	-1.02%
RGEN	F	-1.01%
GMAB	F	-0.97%
ARCT	D	-0.97%
PFE	D	-0.87%
ADM	F	-0.84%
ORGN	C	-0.81%
BMRN	F	-0.78%
BIIB	F	-0.77%
ARWR	F	-0.75%
FMC	C	-0.73%
SDGR	F	-0.7%
BYND	D	-0.69%
RGNX	F	-0.69%
NTLA	F	-0.64%
ALLO	D	-0.62%
EDIT	F	-0.6%
GPRE	F	-0.56%
CRBU	F	-0.49%
TXG	F	-0.49%
MRNA	F	-0.46%
SANA	F	-0.45%
VERV	F	-0.43%
CVAC	F	-0.37%
ABSI	F	-0.27%
PGEN	F	-0.22%
PACB	D	-0.18%